On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:18:19 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:20 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP
-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-

The entertainment value of your feud has passed; if neither of you is
going to extend an olive branch why don't you at least accept a
cease-fire.

I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.

Very little positive to say about it. Sure, I believe you are more
knowledgeable about radio than RHF and I've often commented on his
godawful writing style and lack of substantive contribution in actual
knowledge. However, either of you could walk away from the feud and
neither of you chooses to.

Now, if you mean positive contribution to be me sticking some barbs in
RHF that would be akin to bayonetting a dead soldier. Or do you wish
I should challenge Eduardo Gleason - again, very little to say that
hasn't been said already.

So, that leaves my one positive contribution as suggesting that the
parties cease their bickering and if you don't find that positive
and/or relevant well that's just too damn bad 'cause I don't play to
you as my primary audience nor do I seek or need your approval of what
I post.

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:18:19 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:20 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP
-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-

The entertainment value of your feud has passed; if neither of you is
going to extend an olive branch why don't you at least accept a
cease-fire.

I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.

Very little positive to say about it. Sure, I believe you are more
knowledgeable about radio than RHF and I've often commented on his
godawful writing style and lack of substantive contribution in actual
knowledge. However, either of you could walk away from the feud and
neither of you chooses to.

Now, if you mean positive contribution to be me sticking some barbs in
RHF that would be akin to bayonetting a dead soldier. Or do you wish
I should challenge Eduardo Gleason - again, very little to say that
hasn't been said already.

So, that leaves my one positive contribution as suggesting that the
parties cease their bickering and if you don't find that positive
and/or relevant well that's just too damn bad 'cause I don't play to
you as my primary audience nor do I seek or need your approval of what
I post.

I've tried the non-confrontational approach and that was unsatisfactory.

I need another suggestion.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:53:52 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:18:19 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:20 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP
-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-

The entertainment value of your feud has passed; if neither of you is
going to extend an olive branch why don't you at least accept a
cease-fire.

I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.

Very little positive to say about it. Sure, I believe you are more
knowledgeable about radio than RHF and I've often commented on his
godawful writing style and lack of substantive contribution in actual
knowledge. However, either of you could walk away from the feud and
neither of you chooses to.

Now, if you mean positive contribution to be me sticking some barbs in
RHF that would be akin to bayonetting a dead soldier. Or do you wish
I should challenge Eduardo Gleason - again, very little to say that
hasn't been said already.

So, that leaves my one positive contribution as suggesting that the
parties cease their bickering and if you don't find that positive
and/or relevant well that's just too damn bad 'cause I don't play to
you as my primary audience nor do I seek or need your approval of what
I post.

I've tried the non-confrontational approach and that was unsatisfactory.

I need another suggestion.

Semtex?

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:53:52 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:18:19 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:20 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP
-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-

The entertainment value of your feud has passed; if neither of you is
going to extend an olive branch why don't you at least accept a
cease-fire.

I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.

Very little positive to say about it. Sure, I believe you are more
knowledgeable about radio than RHF and I've often commented on his
godawful writing style and lack of substantive contribution in actual
knowledge. However, either of you could walk away from the feud and
neither of you chooses to.

Now, if you mean positive contribution to be me sticking some barbs in
RHF that would be akin to bayonetting a dead soldier. Or do you wish
I should challenge Eduardo Gleason - again, very little to say that
hasn't been said already.

So, that leaves my one positive contribution as suggesting that the
parties cease their bickering and if you don't find that positive
and/or relevant well that's just too damn bad 'cause I don't play to
you as my primary audience nor do I seek or need your approval of what
I post.

I've tried the non-confrontational approach and that was unsatisfactory.

I need another suggestion.

Semtex?

Might be worth a try.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Feb 24, 3:40*pm, dxAce wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
*dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? *There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.
I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.

No damn sunspots, no damn shortwave.

Plenty to listen to from late afternoon to early mornings.

And when nothing is going on, and ya already got the QSL's, one can always get
on the monkey boy 'Eduardo' and urge him to provide that documentation!

He is to busy eating crow to do that.

- Yeah, crow is a traditional Hispanic dish.

Cuervo Asado

On Feb 24, 3:18*pm, Telamon
wrote:

* * * Three Star Snip * * *

- - The entertainment value of your feud has passed;
- -*if neither of you is going to extend an olive branch
- - why don't you at least accept a cease-fire. *
-
- I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
-

Telamon,

Each of Your Negativity {Attack} Posts Against Me :
Will simply Result in a Reply by Me.
[ You Are Playing a Game of Newsgroup Ping-Pong ]

Again -IF- it is you objective to Improve / Better this
Newsgroup : Then Start by Being Positive Yourself
and Post something Positive Each Day to the Group.
Hey -if- I like what I Read being Posted by You :
I might even give you an Atta-Boy.

Once More Here is My Message of Hope for You
and Others who Read and Post to this Newsgroup.

(OT) : My Positive Message of Hope for Telamon and
'Others' - Each of You Can Make A Difference.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...5262fe2c0024e5

PLUS - Improve the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup
-by- Make On-Topic Posts -not- Waring Words
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...fa1c6bb6c19cd0

Telamon - Do You Have an Action Plan for a Better RRS Newsgroup :
Other Than To Drive People {Myself} Away ?
. . . and After Me Who's Next On Your List ?

dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:


Yeah, crow is a traditional Hispanic dish.

================================
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but
I find that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable
time here on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and
those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the
world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

========================================

dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:

And when nothing is going on, and ya already got the QSL's, one can
always get on the monkey boy 'Eduardo' and urge him to provide that
documentation!


================================
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but
I find that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable
time here on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and
those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the
world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

========================================

dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:

You'd know whoppers, oh pathological one!


================================
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but
I find that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable
time here on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and
those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the
world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

========================================

dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:

Go for it.


================================
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but
I find that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable
time here on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and
those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the
world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

========================================