David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


So it was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you
owned
them...



No, it was because the 120 station strong Puerto Rico Broadcasters
Association felt the stations were illegal. And they were.

Illegal my ass...

It was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño
and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey
could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and
Moca to the West and Southwest.

It's a government radio station, providing info to gov't personnel.

No, it is a Military station intended to serve, and only serve, military
personnel on base. In fact, in US territories where the FCC licenses
stations, they are not supposed to get any signal off the base.

Any signal? Obviously you're showing yet again your ignorance of real radio, you
stinking little prick.

Get the hell out of my country, boy, and head back to where those who appreciate
little NAZI *******s such as yourself, you little faux Hispanic piece of ****.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power
FM
when
the PRBA presented its case.

You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you
owned
them...


You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up
all
the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before
handing
them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would
imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to
go
to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend.

You'll be in Mexico in a week or so stocking up not only on the cheap
stuff, but
you'll be getting some of the other 'cheap stuff', won't you boy?

No, actually I will be in NY. Stop by the Parker Meridien for a visit, why
don'cha?

Is that the gay place to be?

I have not been to Mexico since 2004 when I conducted a seminar for
Arbitron.

Somehow I doubt that.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile
does
not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM
would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed
nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles
from
the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting
them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as
several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If
there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could
be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

No, nearly none lived off base.

No matter, you're off base, you whiny little SOB. Heavy emphasis on the
SOB,
boy.

What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally in a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of the
AFRTS operational dictates.

On Jun 1, 10:35*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in ...

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message

*You're contradicting yourself, again. If they're not listening, they
can't be calling.

"Youngest demos" for talk is generally35-44.

- - Nice evasion.

- Nope. Truth. When a format is typically 25+, the young part
is35-54.

d'Eduardo - D'Oh ! and the Older Part is 55+ - d'oh again ~ RHF

RW OnLine Newsbytes :

Interep - Survey Says Older Demographic Still Yields Clout
http://www.rwonline.com/dailynews/sh...nth=12&week=50

-source- RW OnLine - Radio World Newspaper {USA}
http://www.rwonline.com/contact_us.shtml

59 Million Consumers who are Ages 55 Years or Older
and make up 21% of the Population growing to 25% by
2010. - - - For more information visit : www.interep.com.

=EXAMPLE=
AM 840 (kHz) KMPH in Modesto, CA just changed it form
"Music with Class" to Talk Radio "The PATRIOT" with a
target audience of 50+ -WHY- Because in a Market with
20 or more AM Radio Stations to Listen To : The Over-50
Group is 25% of the Population; and the Over-65 Group is
12% of the Population; and both Groups make up even
more larger Percentages of the Radio Listening Public.
Plus AM 840 KMPH "The PATRIOT" has enough Local
Talent and Programming on the Air {Local Content} to
make it 'sound' like a Local Radio Station.
http://www.kmph840.com/
http://www.modestoradiomuseum.org/km...0page%201.html
https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/us.html
http://www.sfradiomuseum.com/blog/20...sto-am-to.html

One-in-20 is 5% and when a Radio Station has a 'chance'
to Define itsels as "The Radio Station for the Over-50-Crowd
it is looking at a better than even Market Share with a
'potential' 2~3 Multiple. Most/Many of the 'other' Radio
Stations are going after the Prime Sellable Demographic
of 18~35 Years for Advertisers and Revenue. But if you
Listen to KMPH you will hear Advertisers with Products
that are Used and Needed by those Over-the-Age-of-50
and that to is a good consistant source of Advertising
Revenue for a Radio Station.

The same goes for the FM Radio Band and FM Radio
Stations : Wherever there is 20 or more FM Radio Stations
in a Metro {Serving a Community} there is room for one
of those Radio Stations to be "The Music Radio Station"
for the Over-the-Age-of-50 Group. Plus there are a large
number of Advertisers with Products and Services that
are Used and Needed by those Over-the-Age-of-50 and
that are a good consistant source of Advertising Revenue
for an FM Music Radio Station.

Forget IBOC : AM & FM Radio Featuring the Right Content
for the Right Audience : It $ell$ ~ RHF

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


No, it is a Military station intended to serve, and only serve, military
personnel on base. In fact, in US territories where the FCC licenses
stations, they are not supposed to get any signal off the base.

Any signal? Obviously you're showing yet again your ignorance of real
radio, you
stinking little prick.

The actual term is "significant signal" and that means that such a station
should not be listenable more than a few hundred meters from a base. Use of
carrier current or very low power FM is the answer.

How many AFRTS stations can you find in the Lower 48 that can be heard off
base?

Get the hell out of my country, boy, and head back to where those who
appreciate
little NAZI *******s such as yourself, you little faux Hispanic piece of
****.

An Hispanic is one who is culturally Hispanic... I sure would not like to be
of your nasty culture

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile
does
not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM
would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed
nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles
from
the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting
them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as
several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If
there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could
be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

No, nearly none lived off base.

No matter, you're off base, you whiny little SOB. Heavy emphasis on the
SOB,
boy.

What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally in a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of the
AFRTS operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been full of **** for
quite a number of years, not only here, but in numerous radio clubs throughout
our great land.

Hit the road, SOB.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



No, actually I will be in NY. Stop by the Parker Meridien for a visit,
why
don'cha?

Is that the gay place to be?

No, actually you can look it up and find out what kind of place it is.

I have not been to Mexico since 2004 when I conducted a seminar for
Arbitron.

Somehow I doubt that.

Contact: Clara Carneiro of Arbitron in Columbia, MD., for whom I did about a
half dozen ratings seminars in Mexico for Arbitron clients and for the
Broadcasters Association of the Valley of Mexico.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


No, it is a Military station intended to serve, and only serve, military
personnel on base. In fact, in US territories where the FCC licenses
stations, they are not supposed to get any signal off the base.

Any signal? Obviously you're showing yet again your ignorance of real
radio, you
stinking little prick.

The actual term is "significant signal" and that means that such a station
should not be listenable more than a few hundred meters from a base. Use of
carrier current or very low power FM is the answer.

How many AFRTS stations can you find in the Lower 48 that can be heard off
base?

Get the hell out of my country, boy, and head back to where those who
appreciate
little NAZI *******s such as yourself, you little faux Hispanic piece of
****.

An Hispanic is one who is culturally Hispanic... I sure would not like to be
of your nasty culture

You're full of ****, SOB.

Now hit the the road as you are NOT Hispanic, never have been, never will be.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally in
a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS
board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not
put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of the
AFRTS operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been full of ****
for
quite a number of years, not only here, but in numerous radio clubs
throughout
our great land.


The fact is that the PRBA got the AFRTS stations closed down for operating
outside the parameters of such a station.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



No, actually I will be in NY. Stop by the Parker Meridien for a visit,
why
don'cha?

Is that the gay place to be?

No, actually you can look it up and find out what kind of place it is.

I have not been to Mexico since 2004 when I conducted a seminar for
Arbitron.

Somehow I doubt that.

Contact: Clara Carneiro of Arbitron in Columbia, MD., for whom I did about a
half dozen ratings seminars in Mexico for Arbitron clients and for the
Broadcasters Association of the Valley of Mexico.

Were you the blower or the blowee?