"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.


That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.


That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

Guess you'd better try and find some other place to go, and renounce your
citizenship, boy.

Extremely heavy emphasis on the BOY.

On Jun 1, 3:24*pm, dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.

That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

Guess you'd better try and find some other place to go, and renounce your
citizenship, boy.

- Extremely heavy emphasis on the BOY.

Extremely heavy Audio Processing emphasis on the BOY.
http://www.solidynepro.com/documentos/JAES-07-ENG.pdf

# 27 - Breaking the Language Barrier - Gringos in Spanish Radio
http://www.nabstore.com/2007-radio-s...ecord2007.html

David Eduardo wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.


That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

But, at any rate, as usual, you are way off base, 'Eduardo'.

Give it up, and leave the country, yet again.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage.
AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power
FM
when the PRBA presented its case.


That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does
not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM
would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed
nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from
the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting
them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If
there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

No, nearly none lived off base.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage.
AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power
FM
when the PRBA presented its case.


That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does
not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM
would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed
nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from
the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting
them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If
there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

No, nearly none lived off base.

No matter, you're off base, you whiny little SOB. Heavy emphasis on the SOB,
boy.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile
does
not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM
would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed
nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles
from
the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting
them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as
several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If
there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could
be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

No, nearly none lived off base.

No matter, you're off base, you whiny little SOB. Heavy emphasis on the
SOB,
boy.

What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally in a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of the
AFRTS operational dictates.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile
does
not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM
would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed
nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles
from
the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting
them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as
several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If
there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could
be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

A lot of folks lived off base?

No, nearly none lived off base.

No matter, you're off base, you whiny little SOB. Heavy emphasis on the
SOB,
boy.

What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally in a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of the
AFRTS operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been full of **** for
quite a number of years, not only here, but in numerous radio clubs throughout
our great land.

Hit the road, SOB.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally in
a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS
board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not
put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of the
AFRTS operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been full of ****
for
quite a number of years, not only here, but in numerous radio clubs
throughout
our great land.


The fact is that the PRBA got the AFRTS stations closed down for operating
outside the parameters of such a station.

David Frackelton Gleason, who poses as 'Eduardo', blew some more beans out his
ass when he wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataño and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.


That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....

An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.

Crap, you need to move back to PR, 'Eduardo', where you could pretend that you
are President!