On May 27, 10:37 pm, m II wrote:



I'm in the middle of the road. That is the best place to be. Moderation
in all things.

I used the phrase Classical Anarchy so we didn't all get visions of
Boris Badenov blowing up everything. Destruction isn't what Anarchy is
about. To me, it means no State planning my life and future.

On the other end, Extremist commies *and* fascists both tend to control
the population, using whatever means needed. The secret police are
especially important to BOTH of these types and the citizens are
encouraged to spy on each other. With enough fear, you get complete
cooperation. We are at the dawn of that State now.

Have any Presidential candidates promised to repeal the Patriot Acts?

mike

I understand what classical anarchy is. But you are correct in
assuming most people don't because they don't. More of the dumbing
down agenda of our rulers bearing fruit - oxen are much easier to
control than intellectuals.

The more I study history and observe world events the better anarchy
looks. There are lots of good anarchy sites on the web. One to check
out is http://www.audioanarchy.org/index.php

And of course none of the candidates have promised to repeal the
Patriot Act. Do you really think any of them would be in a position to
ascend to the Presidency if they had? It wouldn't be permitted.

Noam Chomsky asserts that the US is, and always has been, a polyarchy,
i.e. the ruling elite choose the individuals who will rule and then
let the people vote for them to create the illusion of participatory
democracy. Presidential election history makes it very difficult to
refute his thesis.

Tex wrote:

Noam Chomsky asserts that the US is, and always has been, a polyarchy,
i.e. the ruling elite choose the individuals who will rule and then
let the people vote for them to create the illusion of participatory
democracy. Presidential election history makes it very difficult to
refute his thesis.


Very likely true. The candidates are pre selected for our approval. It's
like a shell game where even if you win you lose.


mike

Bob Dobbs wrote:

m II wrote:
It's like a shell game where even if you win you lose.

You mean if you pick up all three shells,
there ain't **** under any of 'em?


Yes, or worse, there is **** under all three.





mike