Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

dxAce, full time Bozo, wrote:

Pure pedant.

You really should learn the usage of nouns. The correct form of the word
in this case is 'pedantry', making it 'Pure pedantry'.

Another correct variation of your attempted slur is:

'purely pedantic'


A 'pedant' is a person, so your attempt at literacy, 'pure pedant',
actually means 'saintly male teacher'.



mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

d'Eduardo -proclaims- Much of the Population Does Not Even KnowAM Radio Exists
 

Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau can
not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all data is
based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE legal, this is
not a major issue.

First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless,
then proceed to throw out your statistics.
Equally meaningless, no doubt.

Well, stop and think about it. If you can't know how many illegals
there are, you can't know how many legals there are.

That he quotes a figure for legals requires that he knows how many
are illegal. Since he openly admits he doesn't report illegal immigrants
in this country to INS, he's an accessory to a number of crimes.

Calling his claims and credibility into question, by exposing an
openly admitted lack of integrity.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

m II wrote:

dxAce, full time Bozo, wrote:

Pure pedant.

You really should learn the usage of nouns. The correct form of the word
in this case is 'pedantry', making it 'Pure pedantry'.

Another correct variation of your attempted slur is:

'purely pedantic'

A 'pedant' is a person, so your attempt at literacy, 'pure pedant',
actually means 'saintly male teacher'.

Thanks, now all you need to do is take that and your shine box on the road and
you might just accomplish something.

d'Eduardo : So your 'Answer' is that +20% of All Adult Radio
 

On Jun 6, 12:30*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

...
On Jun 6, 4:50 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:



It's much simpler... if a radio station programming does not attract
listeners that advertisers want to reach, it either is sold to someone
else
or it changes programming.

So Corporate Media's Excuse to Radio Listeners over the
Age of 55 and Age 49 for Hispanic Radio Listeners is :
IT THE ADVERTISERS FAULT !

It is not anyone's "fault" but simply the way advertiser supported media
works.

- The government in the US does not intervene and
- has not for about 40 years, in licensee decisions
- about program formats.

We are NOT talking about Programming Formats
We Are Talking About Discriminating Against the
+20% of the Adult Poplutation Over the Age of 55.

55+ listens to radio just as much as 45-54, for example. It's just that
there are no formats specifically designed for over-55, since they would not
survive.

d'Eduardo - Still Sounds Like and Overt Case
of 55+ Age Discrimination to me. ~ RHF

d'Eduardo -proclaims- Much of the Population Does Not Even KnowAM Radio Exists
 

On Jun 6, 11:01*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin *

And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau can
not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all data is
based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE legal, this is
not a major issue.

First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless,
then proceed to throw out your statistics.
Equally meaningless, no doubt.

- Well, stop and think about it.
- If you can't know how many illegals there are,
- you can't know how many legals there are.

there are, -because- There Are. -unless- THERE AIN'T !

* *That he quotes a figure for legals requires that he knows how many
are illegal. Since he openly admits he doesn't report illegal immigrants
in this country to INS, he's an accessory to a number of crimes.

* *Calling his claims and credibility into question, by exposing an
openly admitted lack of integrity.

d'Eduardo -proclaims- Much of the Population Does Not Even KnowAM Radio Exists
 

On Jun 6, 12:37*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in ...

Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin
And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau
can not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all
data is based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE
legal, this is not a major issue.

First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless, then
proceed to throw out your statistics. Equally meaningless, no doubt.

* Well, stop and think about it. If you can't know how many illegals there
are, you can't know how many legals there are.

- You can know the national number,
- but not the specifics for any jusrisdiction.

d'Eduardo - That's Another Burger King Answer. ~ RHF

- Every major source of demographics, public and private,
- has an estimate based on crossings less repatriations,
- but nobody has exact data on individual metros

d'Eduardo - You are becoming entertaining . . .

d'Eduardo -proclaims- Much of the Population Does Not Even Know AMRadio Exists
 

RHF wrote:

On Jun 6, 12:37 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in ...

Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin
And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau
can not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all
data is based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE
legal, this is not a major issue.

First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless, then
proceed to throw out your statistics. Equally meaningless, no doubt.

Well, stop and think about it. If you can't know how many illegals there
are, you can't know how many legals there are.

- You can know the national number,
- but not the specifics for any jusrisdiction.

d'Eduardo - That's Another Burger King Answer. ~ RHF

- Every major source of demographics, public and private,
- has an estimate based on crossings less repatriations,
- but nobody has exact data on individual metros

d'Eduardo - You are becoming entertaining . . .

Pure pedantry = pure entertainment

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

dxAce, full time Bozo, wrote:

Pure pedant.
You really should learn the usage of nouns. The correct form of the word
in this case is 'pedantry', making it 'Pure pedantry'.

Another correct variation of your attempted slur is:

'purely pedantic'

A 'pedant' is a person, so your attempt at literacy, 'pure pedant',
actually means 'saintly male teacher'.

Thanks, now all you need to do is take that and your shine box on the road and
you might just accomplish something.




Actually, 'pedant' is defined as:


n., A person who is excessively concerned with minor details and
rules, or with displaying academic learning.



Given his academic credentials, I'd say David is definitely
overcompensating for some perceived defiency.

"That's our Eduardo!"

d'Eduardo -proclaims- Much of the Population Does Not Even KnowAM Radio Exists
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin
And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau
can not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all
data is based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE
legal, this is not a major issue.
First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless, then
proceed to throw out your statistics. Equally meaningless, no doubt.
Well, stop and think about it. If you can't know how many illegals there
are, you can't know how many legals there are.

You can know the national number, but not the specifics for any
jusrisdiction.

Every major source of demographics, public and private, has an estimate
based on crossings less repatriations, but nobody has exact data on
individual metros




Then don't be arguing numbers.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

On Jun 6, 1:00*pm, dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Fri, 6
Jun 2008 04:11:50 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

The first source of info is TV for most of the two
youngest generations of Americans.

You mean that pile of debris on the floor over there
that used to be the 'big screen'?

At the risk of getting back somewhere close to on topic,
My E1 will likely survive a hell of a lot more abuse
than the TV will, and still come on and play KNX. g

- - Any quake big enough to reach that point will
- - probably fell the KNX tower, which is on a
- - liquefaction zone, or kill the STL infrastructure.

- 'Eduardo', your brain is a liquefaction zone.

That would be the Ice Chest at . . .
most Amateur Radio Field Days.