David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are
concerned
with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little
saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in
about
6 to 8 years.

You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one!

You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the
amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an
investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account by
something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done.

Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT investments
or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting problems
they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now.

You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are
concerned
with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little
saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in
about
6 to 8 years.

You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one!

You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the
amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an
investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account
by
something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done.

Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT
investments
or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting
problems
they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now.

You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout!

So you are saying one or more of the following is true:

1. You can take more than 3% to 4% of savings and retain present value of
the capital (in other words, adjusted for inflation).
2. Inflation does not have to be accounted for in the ongoing worth of
capital.
3. You can make an inflation and tax adjusted 7% over the last 18 months

Which is it (or "are they") as you may have invented a new school of
economics.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are
concerned
with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little
saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in
about
6 to 8 years.

You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one!

You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the
amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an
investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account
by
something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done.

Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT
investments
or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting
problems
they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now.

You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout!

So you are saying one or more of the following is true:

1. You can take more than 3% to 4% of savings and retain present value of
the capital (in other words, adjusted for inflation).
2. Inflation does not have to be accounted for in the ongoing worth of
capital.
3. You can make an inflation and tax adjusted 7% over the last 18 months

Which is it (or "are they") as you may have invented a new school of
economics.

One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable knowledge
of economics and investments.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and Securities.

You on the other hand have a GED.

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and Securities.

You on the other hand have a GED.

So, therefore, you can blow it out your fabricating ass!

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!

What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and Securities.

You on the other hand have a GED.





LOL!

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!

What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable
knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand
Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and
Securities.

You on the other hand have a GED.





LOL!

Funny only if you realize my HS from Ecuador is not accredited in the US and
the fact I left HS was to build my own major market radio station; with the
GED i was able to study a really wide variety of programming courses, like
sociology, cultural anthropology, etc., too.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable
knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand
Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and
Securities.

If you do not know how to calculate net present value, you must have slept
during the classes. And for which you have to show investments in the low 6
digits.

You on the other hand have a GED.

Which I used to spend several years on the Dean's list at ASU, a slightly
better known university and from which I was plucked by the most respected
headhunter in the broadcast business to rebuild a broadcast subsidiary for a
NYSE listed company which made me an officer and division VP.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable
knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand
Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and
Securities.

If you do not know how to calculate net present value, you must have slept
during the classes.

What would indicate that I did not know how to do that?

And for which you have to show investments in the low 6
digits.

You on the other hand have a GED.

Which I used to spend several years on the Dean's list at ASU, a slightly
better known university and from which I was plucked by the most respected
headhunter in the broadcast business to rebuild a broadcast subsidiary for a
NYSE listed company which made me an officer and division VP.

Yet, you do not have a degree.

Good night, 'Eduardo'.