"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.

What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.

What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.

You yourself denigrates it.

Best you pick lettuce (wash your hands first).

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.
What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.




Then why are you still here? With as much responsibility as you
claim, you spend a lot of time arguing with people whom you don't respect.

Which calls into question a number of things.

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.
What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.



Then why are you still here? With as much responsibility as you
claim, you spend a lot of time arguing with people whom you don't respect.

Which calls into question a number of things.

Indeed!

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.
What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now
does everything possible to denigrate it.


Then why are you still here? With as much responsibility as you claim,
you spend a lot of time arguing with people whom you don't respect.

Most people have more free time than work time.

Which calls into question a number of things.

Like?

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.
What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.




So, you're not here to participate...you're here to stir up noise.
Got it.

Your employer must be SO proud.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.
What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now
does everything possible to denigrate it.


So, you're not here to participate...you're here to stir up noise. Got
it.

Your employer must be SO proud.

I doubt anyone's employer is very concerned about hobby or sports or any
leisure time activities folks engage in, unless they find the gun club
member is also sticking up 7-11's.

I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about
immigration topics.

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Always comes down to money and status with you.
The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.
What ARE you compensating for?

I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now
does everything possible to denigrate it.

So, you're not here to participate...you're here to stir up noise. Got
it.

Your employer must be SO proud.

I doubt anyone's employer is very concerned about hobby or sports or any
leisure time activities folks engage in, unless they find the gun club
member is also sticking up 7-11's.

I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about
immigration topics.

\

Good. Let them object. Let them ask my why.

As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd
have us believe.

I'm far from alone, here.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
news
David Eduardo wrote:

I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings
about immigration topics.

As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have
us believe.

I'm far from alone, here.


The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants.
There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed
to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze
the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary
situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate
is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the
unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work
and those who are in the wrong place for getting work.

Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply
cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be
paralyzed.

On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially
told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce
existing laws. So in came enough people to equal the total populations of
Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them.
Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally
been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a
developed economy.

So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are
significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth. Yet we want to
send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been
here, in some cases, for decades.

Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an
opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They are a
vital part of the nation and the economy.

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
news
David Eduardo wrote:

I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings
about immigration topics.

As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have
us believe.

I'm far from alone, here.


The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants.
There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed
to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze
the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary
situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate
is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the
unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work
and those who are in the wrong place for getting work.

Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply
cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be
paralyzed.

BS



On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially
told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce
existing laws.

What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo?

So in came enough people to equal the total populations of
Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them.
Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally
been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a
developed economy.

So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are
significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth.

That can be changed.

Yet we want to
send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been
here, in some cases, for decades.

They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's the problem?



Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an
opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They are a
vital part of the nation and the economy.

Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement!