RHF wrote:

On Jun 7, 7:59 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in ...

- - - David Eduardo wrote:
- - - I do not believe in illegal immigration, and believe
- - - there should be controls as well as enforcement.
- - - However, those here with no criminal record should
- - - have a path to residency, particularly if they have
- - - children born or naturalized here.

- - So, you believe in amnesty for illegal immigration.
- - Thanks for clearing that up.

- I believe in a path to legal residence, not amnesty.

d"Eduardo,

Hey We Can Agree -Provided- The Path Leads Straight
Back To Mexico -Where- They Can Wait-in-Line To
Legally Enter The USA As A Legal Resident.

dang that was simple ~ RHF

- Those with a criminal record (criminal, not misdemeanors)
- should not be eligible. All others should be considered,
- perhaps made to pay a fine and some costs, but if they
- have family and children here, allowed to become a resident
- and, eventually, a citizen.
-
- In other words, pretty much the plan of the Democrats
- and that of organizations such as the NCLR.

Sorry, they need to go back home and wait in line like anyone else.

What part of the word 'illegal' doesn't register in your pea sized brain?

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Sorry, they need to go back home and wait in line like anyone else.

What part of the word 'illegal' doesn't register in your pea sized brain?


For someone who supposed did go to college, even a bad one, the idea of
removing about 7 to 8 million from the employed workforce (around 60% of the
total illegal immigrant count, per FAIR) would create either a deep
recession or a true depression.

It is also not humane, and logistically not possible anyway.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Sorry, they need to go back home and wait in line like anyone else.

What part of the word 'illegal' doesn't register in your pea sized brain?


For someone who supposed did go to college, even a bad one, the idea of
removing about 7 to 8 million from the employed workforce (around 60% of the
total illegal immigrant count, per FAIR) would create either a deep
recession or a true depression.

'supposed did go'? Is that GED speak?

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Sorry, they need to go back home and wait in line like anyone else.

What part of the word 'illegal' doesn't register in your pea sized
brain?


For someone who supposed did go to college, even a bad one, the idea of
removing about 7 to 8 million from the employed workforce (around 60% of
the
total illegal immigrant count, per FAIR) would create either a deep
recession or a true depression.

'supposed did go'? Is that GED speak?

Nah, just fast typing and carelessnes.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Sorry, they need to go back home and wait in line like anyone else.

What part of the word 'illegal' doesn't register in your pea sized
brain?


For someone who supposed did go to college, even a bad one, the idea of
removing about 7 to 8 million from the employed workforce (around 60% of
the
total illegal immigrant count, per FAIR) would create either a deep
recession or a true depression.

'supposed did go'? Is that GED speak?

Nah, just fast typing and carelessnes.

I think it was just a case of GED speak.