|
(OT) : Stop the Abortion of Liberalcide !
On Jun 13, 11:46*pm, Telamon
wrote: In article LBJ4k.1365$L03.275@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: See how that works Mikey? I'm not sure. The changing of topic and overstuffed reply by RHF or the timely 'snip'? The example of abortion. - "There is no need to demonize or eliminate them. - The liberals Darwinistic tendencies will take care of that." - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California The Children of Charles Darwin and his Wife Emma : http://www.aboutdarwin.com/darwin/Children.html They had Ten (10) Children : Seven (7) of which had No Children. |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Brody wrote: m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? beyond bizzare.. by this logic, every Jap and German POW should have had a US lawyer and his day in a US court, and presumably release on bond until his court date Yep, most idiotic decision the Supreme's have ever made. When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. mike |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Telamon wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not foreign military combatants. Moron! And what about those people who have been wrongfully imprisoned? You deserve to live in a police state! JB |
(OT) : Gitmo Prisoners are Un-Lawful Military Combatants [Islam-O-FacistTerrorists]
RHF wrote:
On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon wrote: In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. - You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies - to US citizens not foreign military combatants. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly Outside the Geneva Convention 1949. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention * They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned? JB GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists. Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD. Don't Blame the US Justice Department Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts Don't Blame the US President and Administration Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress* both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the US House of representatives and the USSenate alike. * The US Congress Makes the Laws * The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. * The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation is the Fault of the US Congress. as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF . |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
|
SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
harvey wrote:
On Jun 13, 9:16 am, dave wrote: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/83758/ "...too much Fox News may be bad news for conservatives. An April 2007 Pew Research Study survey found that viewers of the conservative Fox News channel had the lowest knowledge of national and international affairs." - yeah? - So what ! Fascist love them some stupid. |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Brody wrote:
beyond bizzare.. by this logic, every Jap and German POW should have had a US lawyer and his day in a US court, and presumably release on bond until his court date Most of the people at Guantanamo were turned-in for bounty or otherwise the result of something other than capture on the battlefield. If they are POWs, this ruling doesn't apply. They are to be held under the Geneva Conventions, which do not allow torture. There is no Declaration of War in effect right now, unlike the Japs and the Gerrys. |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Speak for yourself,,, I am not a pu..ie
cuhulin |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: harvey wrote: On Jun 13, 9:16 am, dave wrote: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/83758/ "...too much Fox News may be bad news for conservatives. An April 2007 Pew Research Study survey found that viewers of the conservative Fox News channel had the lowest knowledge of national and international affairs." Yep ! heard that Saddam Husseins got them WMD's George Bush's Gonna Invade Yessiree Bob . . . We are a nation of pussies. "We", boy? Anybody who's afraid of "terrorists" to the point of throwing away their Liberty is a coward and doesn't deserve to live in a Free Country. |
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Brody wrote:
Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? beyond bizzare.. by this logic, every Jap and German POW should have had a US lawyer and his day in a US court, and presumably release on bond until his court date Those people were not picked up on the street or dragged out of their beds at three in morning or turned in to the occupiers as a means of revenge or as a political move by the competition. An example of how things have been twisted around: After WWII, Japanese soldiers who had water boarded US prisoners were branded as having committed war crimes. In Texas, 1983, a Sheriff and three deputies got 10 years for torturing with the technique. Today, there must be a kinder, gentler version of this torture, as it's accepted US practice. Hell, they even changed the definition of 'torture' to cover their illegal as hell backsides. Please, do some research. Find out what monsters have taken over your country: http://www.searchmash.com/search/jap...oarding+prison mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com