Telamon wrote:
In article ,
"Billy Smith" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Unfortunately in your permanently whacked state you think you generate
normal looking posts. I'm here to tell you that you are whacked and
your
posts reflect that.

Such as?
Go back and read your posts. Most are off the wall rants.

I found a lot of those so called off the wall rants to be much more educated
and requiring intelligence than anything you have ever wrote here

With the reading comprehension problems you have I can believe that.

Please do stick with posts like "death to tyrants" as it is about all
you can handle.

You appear confused.

Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote:


Well for example in this thread you have people wishing happy July 4
to each other you you back with "Death to tyrants". Pretty typical of
you.

That's what Independence Day (aka July 4 by people who don't get it) is
about; overthrowing repressive governments is part of whom we are.


Go back and read The Federalist, and even yet, again, the
Constitution. The reason we have the government that we have is to so we
can enjoy non-violent revolution. Death to nobody. Tyrants are simply
removed from office and left to live in peace. Overthrowing governments
through the ballot.

Only in the gravest extreme, the bullet.

On Jul 6, 5:21*am, "Billy Smith" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...





In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:

All you have to do is read the guy's posts. It is very apparent. You
must be an idiot not to see this.

And the retard comment that I must be doing "pretty heavy stuff" when I
give him a hard time about doing drugs is evidence of cognitive
dissonance on your behalf best case.

You wish.

Really? It's observation Mr. Fried brains.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

- Observing yourself again Douchebag Number Two.

Billy Smith - Less "BS" and more 'BN' {o: Be Nice }

-cause- It's Nice... To Be Nice ! ) ~ RHF

Remembing : "It's Nice... To Be Nice !
- by Louis H. Narcisse,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWwsO5RJurk
- aka: "His Grace" Bishop King Dr. Narcisse D.D.
http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/tf3z09p3cf/
http://www.worthyonegiftsonline.com/...36/page/901610
- Religious Radio Broadcaster
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLJ3mnKspiY

"His Grace" King [formerly Bishop] Louis H Narcisse.
Here was a Singer, Preacher and Founder of the
Mount Zion Spiritual Temple in Oakland, CA whose
Church Services and Radio Programmes regularly
featured Edwin Hawkins
http://www.crossrhythms.co.uk/produc..._Be_Nice/7262/
The Man had Style and Flash plus a White Rolls Royce.

King Narcisse founded Mount Zion Spiritual Temples
http://mcnsarticles.blogspot.com/200...s_archive.html
and claimed a following of 2 Million people in the
United States, Africa, France and Sweden. Now about
2,000 Members are active in Seven Temples in Oakland,
Sacramento, Detroit, New Orleans, Orlando, Houston and
Baton Rouge, said Princess Ann James of the Oakland
Temple. An additional 200,000 Followers Listened to his
Sunday Radio Broadcasts, which were carried in recent
years over KEST after several years over KDIA

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:


Your definition of success doesn't match mine. Successful people stay
married and don't destroy their hearing with pills.



Typical.

Typical of what?

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:


Your definition of success doesn't match mine. Successful people
stay married and don't destroy their hearing with pills.



Typical.

Typical of what?


Typical diversion from the point of the discussion. No different than
Pancho.

D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:


Your definition of success doesn't match mine. Successful people
stay married and don't destroy their hearing with pills.



Typical.

Typical of what?

Typical diversion from the point of the discussion. No different than
Pancho.

Pancho Gleason?

Telamon wrote:

You appear confused.

You appear retarded.


I AM retarded; so what?

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
Your definition of success doesn't match mine. Successful people
stay married and don't destroy their hearing with pills.


Typical.

Typical of what?
Typical diversion from the point of the discussion. No different than
Pancho.

Pancho Gleason?




The very same.

On Jul 6, 6:01*pm, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote:

Well for example in this thread you have people wishing happy July
4 to each other you you back with "Death to tyrants". Pretty
typical of you.

That's what Independence Day (aka July 4 by people who don't get it)
is about; *overthrowing repressive governments is part of whom we are.

* Go back and read The Federalist, and even yet, again, the
Constitution. The reason we have the government that we have is to so
we can enjoy non-violent revolution. Death to nobody. Tyrants are
simply removed from office and left to live in peace. Overthrowing
governments through the ballot.

* Only in the gravest extreme, the bullet.

It's pretty grave out here...

"...extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice!"

* If extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, then get off your
****ing ass and DO something.

* Sitting in your blue smoke haze shouting 'Death to Tyrants' on USENet
is hardly the peak of activism. Nor is it extreme.

* It's just more noise, in a world of screaming wannabe's jealous of
what those who have worked for their success have acquired.

- Your definition of success doesn't match mine.
-*Successful people stay married and don't destroy
- their hearing with pills.

(OT) : Dave - So By Your Own Definition - Are You A Success ?

1 - Been Married Once and Only Once to the Same Woman
and Never Divorced Ever.

2 - Never Did Drugs to the Point that they effected Your
Physical and Mental Wellbeing.

do you walk the talk ~ RHF

On Jul 5, 11:23*pm, Dave wrote:
wrote:
And we have the framers of the Declaration of Independence to thank
that you can even put that in writing on a newsgroup!!!

"Framers" typically refers to the guys who wrote the Constitution,
wherein the right to speak unpopular ideas is enshrined.

Well, OK. What would you prefer to call them, then??