"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I'll get to my local library tomorrow and try and obtain those back
issues
of
the Plain Dealer!

You will find it below the fold in the Monday, 4/23 edition of the Plain
Dealer.

Front page.

1997, right? I'll be certain to check it out.


Or check with Tom Vail, the editor of the paper at the time and her stepson.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I'll get to my local library tomorrow and try and obtain those back
issues
of
the Plain Dealer!

You will find it below the fold in the Monday, 4/23 edition of the Plain
Dealer.

Front page.

1997, right? I'll be certain to check it out.


Or check with Tom Vail, the editor of the paper at the time and her stepson.

Interesting though that 4/23/1997 is a Wednesday (which you say is a Monday),
whilst the obit that you show was published on Monday 4/21/1997 on what is
obviously an interior page.

Why would a paper publish an obit on Monday, and then return and publish it
again on the 'front page' two days later.

Ref: http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I'll get to my local library tomorrow and try and obtain those back
issues
of
the Plain Dealer!

You will find it below the fold in the Monday, 4/23 edition of the Plain
Dealer.

Front page.

1997, right? I'll be certain to check it out.


Or check with Tom Vail, the editor of the paper at the time and her stepson.

Interesting though that 4/23/1997 is a Wednesday (which you say is a Monday),
whilst the obit that you show was published on Monday 4/21/1997 on what is
obviously an interior page.

Why would a paper publish an obit on Monday, and then return and publish it
again on the 'front page' two days later.

And, if they did, why do you not show the 'front page' version on your website?
And, why did you direct us to the obviously interior page obit, whilst claiming
that her obit was on the front page?

Lot's of questions (as usual) 'Eduardo'.



Ref: http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Why would a paper publish an obit on Monday, and then return and publish
it
again on the 'front page' two days later.

They published both on the same day.

And, if they did, why do you not show the 'front page' version on your
website?
And, why did you direct us to the obviously interior page obit, whilst
claiming
that her obit was on the front page?

One is a news article, the other is a much more biographical obituary.
Common with notable persons in a community.

Lot's of questions (as usual) 'Eduardo'.


None at all.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
1997, right? I'll be certain to check it out.


Or check with Tom Vail, the editor of the paper at the time and her
stepson.

Interesting though that 4/23/1997 is a Wednesday (which you say is a
Monday),
whilst the obit that you show was published on Monday 4/21/1997 on what is
obviously an interior page.

I can not read the date, and I do not have the source article at work with
me, as I actually don't carry everything around with me for 24/7 access. If
you say it says the 21st, then you have better eysight than me... it looks
like a 23 to me.


Why would a paper publish an obit on Monday, and then return and publish
it
again on the 'front page' two days later.

Whatever the case, whether it is the 21st or the 23rd, there was a "briefer"
front page news story that day, with a fuller obituary inside. That is
common practice when a notable person dies... it is both news and the reason
for an obit.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
1997, right? I'll be certain to check it out.


Or check with Tom Vail, the editor of the paper at the time and her
stepson.

Interesting though that 4/23/1997 is a Wednesday (which you say is a
Monday),
whilst the obit that you show was published on Monday 4/21/1997 on what is
obviously an interior page.

I can not read the date, and I do not have the source article at work with
me, as I actually don't carry everything around with me for 24/7 access. If
you say it says the 21st, then you have better eysight than me... it looks
like a 23 to me.


Why would a paper publish an obit on Monday, and then return and publish
it
again on the 'front page' two days later.

Whatever the case, whether it is the 21st or the 23rd, there was a "briefer"
front page news story that day, with a fuller obituary inside. That is
common practice when a notable person dies... it is both news and the reason
for an obit.

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm is not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares? The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares? The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.

Give it up, Eddy, and stop coming back making excuses... you're making real
Hispanics look bad!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm
is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares? The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put
the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant
house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or
no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.

Give it up, Eddy, and stop coming back making excuses... you're making
real
Hispanics look bad!


You are absolutely insane. A two day difference in reading a fuzzy JPEG from
11 years ago has no significance to any argument. The issue here was to show
you that my mother was not a "socialite" but a very involved and dedicated
member of the community where she lived. A two day difference in a date is
of zero meaning in this. Nice try at obfuscating, though.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares?

I do, because as usual, you made an outrageous claim. YOU CLAIMED that that
'obit' was on the FRONT PAGE of the Cleveland Plain Dealer. YOU were the one who
made the big productionof making THE CLAIM, and when proven to be a FALSE CLAIM,
you made a big production out that as well.

Bottom line, you piece of ****, is that you are once again proven to be a
PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.