Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My experience indicates this is not quite true. I generally align all
my old radios and I have found differences in them after they are aligned. You are right though in that some improve much more than others but this is for a variety of reasons. My general experience is that some have a diferent apparent AGC curve and some have a large difference in tweeter level.. On some the AGC action on weaker signals ia less which means weaker signals, although received about as well as on the other samples, come in at lower volume, and when you increase the volume to compensate you lose some of the loudness compensation which makes them sound thinner. I don't know though if this is a unit to unit of version to version difference as I have only algined a handful fo these..perhaps 5 or 6. The tweeter level difference is clearly audible on AM or FM althugh it can somewhat be compensated for with the treble control. Jay Have a link to your alignment procedure?? Equipment?? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are there 2 different versions of the E1? | Shortwave | |||
Philips D2999 versions | Shortwave | |||
FA: Wilderness SST QRP Both 20 and 40 meter versions | Equipment | |||
FA: Wilderness SST QRP Both 20 and 40 meter versions | Swap | |||
Icom H16 - different versions? | Scanner |