On Aug 14, 5:53*pm, wrote:
- SO, Obama Looks *funny

- And He Has a Funny name

- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar

- So , everyone votes for John McCain..

What does *that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..

*..

Dream on.

http://www.watoday.com.au/world/no-c...c.html?page=-1

McCain is by far the best candidate the GOP could have put up, but
even with his appeal to independents, Bush has screwed up America so
badly that it stinks from half a world away, and the voters are only
waking up to that more and more with each passing month.

Think 1980, when the country experienced a massive backlash against a
government that had gone too far left, and had failed its citizens.
Today, there is an equally powerful backlash against a government that
has gone equally way-too-far right, and it's going to fuel very
*interesting* turn-out patterns that will confound all the pollsters
and their historically-based "likely voter" turnout calculations.

Obama in a landslide.

On Aug 14, 9:12*pm, RHF wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:53*pm, wrote:

- SO, Obama Looks *funny

- And He Has a Funny name

- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar

- So , everyone votes for John McCain..

What does *that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..

*..

Black Voters Can't Put Obama in the White House

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news...article_id=7ca....

TBL : The Votes of White Blue-Collar Working Americans
Is What Gets US Presidential Candidates Elected.

-ps- these were the same voters that 'bho' made fun of
and put down for clinging to guns and religion ~ RHFhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/14/barackobama.uselections20...
*.

You are deluded. Race is not the primary issue with most Americans,
and it's a state-by-state contest, and Barack Obama has many of the
largest states pretty well nailed down.

The best data suggests that Barack Obama is ahead in electorial votes
by a substantial margin. Some projections have him at over 300
electoral votes.

American voters are ****ed as much as they were in 1980. Except this
time, the government has gone so crazy-nutball far-right instead of
crazy-nutball far left, and the backlash sitting out there is immense
and growing month by month. The turnout of those anti-Republican
voters will surprise the pollsters with their "likely voter"
projections left in ruins, just as the 2006 turnout was unexpectedly
favorable to the Democratic party, costing even relatively popular
Republicans their seats.

It's the beginning of a very long time in the Wilderness for
Republicans. A very, very long time.

So cling to your biased nut news sources. I'll stick with science.

wrote:

On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, RHF wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:53 pm, wrote:

- SO, Obama Looks funny

- And He Has a Funny name

- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar

- So , everyone votes for John McCain..

What does that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..

..

Black Voters Can't Put Obama in the White House

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news...article_id=7ca...

TBL : The Votes of White Blue-Collar Working Americans
Is What Gets US Presidential Candidates Elected.

-ps- these were the same voters that 'bho' made fun of
and put down for clinging to guns and religion ~ RHFhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/14/barackobama.uselections20...
.

You are deluded. Race is not the primary issue with most Americans,
and it's a state-by-state contest, and Barack Obama has many of the
largest states pretty well nailed down.

The best data suggests that Barack Obama is ahead in electorial votes
by a substantial margin. Some projections have him at over 300
electoral votes.

American voters are ****ed as much as they were in 1980. Except this
time, the government has gone so crazy-nutball far-right instead of
crazy-nutball far left, and the backlash sitting out there is immense
and growing month by month. The turnout of those anti-Republican
voters will surprise the pollsters with their "likely voter"
projections left in ruins, just as the 2006 turnout was unexpectedly
favorable to the Democratic party, costing even relatively popular
Republicans their seats.

It's the beginning of a very long time in the Wilderness for
Republicans. A very, very long time.

So cling to your biased nut news sources. I'll stick with science.

I'd rather stick with something other than the Marxist nut case Obama.

wrote:

On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, RHF wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:53 pm, wrote:

- SO, Obama Looks funny

- And He Has a Funny name

- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar

- So , everyone votes for John McCain..

What does that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..

..

Black Voters Can't Put Obama in the White House

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news...article_id=7ca...

TBL : The Votes of White Blue-Collar Working Americans
Is What Gets US Presidential Candidates Elected.

-ps- these were the same voters that 'bho' made fun of
and put down for clinging to guns and religion ~ RHFhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/14/barackobama.uselections20...
.

You are deluded. Race is not the primary issue with most Americans,
and it's a state-by-state contest, and Barack Obama has many of the
largest states pretty well nailed down.

The best data suggests that Barack Obama is ahead in electorial votes
by a substantial margin.

Wait! Are the Liberal/DemocratMarxists going with the Popular Vote this time around or the Electoral Vote? Or.. are they going to
decide AFTER the election which one they want?

On Aug 15, 2:13*am, wrote:
On Aug 14, 9:12*pm, RHF wrote:



On Aug 14, 5:53*pm, wrote:

- SO, Obama Looks *funny

- And He Has a Funny name

- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar

- So , everyone votes for John McCain..

What does *that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..

*..

Black Voters Can't Put Obama in the White House

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news...article_id=7ca....

TBL : The Votes of White Blue-Collar Working Americans
Is What Gets US Presidential Candidates Elected.

-ps- these were the same voters that 'bho' made fun of
and put down for clinging to guns and religion ~ RHFhttp://www.guardian..co.uk/world/2008/apr/14/barackobama.uselections20...
*.

You are deluded. *Race is not the primary issue with most Americans,
and it's a state-by-state contest, and Barack Obama has many of the
largest states pretty well nailed down.

The best data suggests that Barack Obama is ahead in electorial votes
by a substantial margin. *Some projections have him at over 300
electoral votes.

American voters are ****ed as much as they were in 1980. *Except this
time, the government has gone so crazy-nutball far-right instead of
crazy-nutball far left, and the backlash sitting out there is immense
and growing month by month. *The turnout of those anti-Republican
voters will surprise the pollsters *with their "likely voter"
projections left in ruins, just as the 2006 turnout was unexpectedly
favorable to the Democratic party, costing even relatively popular
Republicans their seats.

It's the beginning of a very long time in the Wilderness for
Republicans. *A very, very long time.

So cling to your biased nut news sources. *I'll stick with science.

The Working Guys know;

KNOW

That Rush Speaks the Truth

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...d=opinionsbox1

- So, they line up, cash their unemployment checks,

Bang down a few cold ones, hop in the truck and , fortified by fears
of

- Well, WHo Knows WHAT could happen if
as Rush Says,
that Ultra Liberal Barak Hussein Obama gets into the White House.,,

- They Vote for McCain !

The Churches, Inspired by the thought of a Godless, COmmunist

- One of THOSE People ; in the "White House",
rally their Congregations,

Fill then with Terrors of, well, "You Know".

Pick them up outside of Wal-Mart

Bus them down to the polling booth and THEY all vote for McCain.

and the Dewey eyed college kids,
hearing that Obama will win in a landslide

Part Party Party

and Don't Vote..

He Looks Funny
Has A Funny Name
All Spell Out

Victory For McCain ! !

On Aug 14, 11:13*pm, wrote:
On Aug 14, 9:12*pm, RHF wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:53*pm, wrote:
- SO, Obama Looks *funny
- And He Has a Funny name
- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar
- So , everyone votes for John McCain..
What does *that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..
*..
Black Voters Can't Put Obama in the White House
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news...article_id=7ca....
TBL : The Votes of White Blue-Collar Working Americans
Is What Gets US Presidential Candidates Elected.
-ps- these were the same voters that 'bho' made fun of
and put down for clinging to guns and religion ~ RHF
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008....uselections20....
*.
You are deluded. *Race is not the primary issue with most Americans,
and it's a state-by-state contest, and Barack Obama has many of the
largest states pretty well nailed down.

- The best data suggests that Barack Obama is ahead
- in electorial votes by a substantial margin. *
- Some projections have him at over 300 electoral votes.

DB McD - On 20 June 2008 RHF -wrote-
At present the reality is that Barack Hussein Obama II
(BHO) should Win the Electoral College by about 64
Votes : 301 to 237 of the Total of 538 Electors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...2ac9ee89e406bc
- - - it's a 'vision' thing ~ RHF

American voters are ****ed as much as they were in 1980. *Except this
time, the government has gone so crazy-nutball far-right instead of
crazy-nutball far left, and the backlash sitting out there is immense
and growing month by month. *The turnout of those anti-Republican
voters will surprise the pollsters *with their "likely voter"
projections left in ruins, just as the 2006 turnout was unexpectedly
favorable to the Democratic party, costing even relatively popular
Republicans their seats.

It's the beginning of a very long time in the Wilderness for
Republicans. *A very, very long time.

- So cling to your biased nut news sources.

-*I'll stick with science.

DB McD - So your Brain 'fits' in a Petri Dish . . .

Sad But True - Are White Voters Telling Da Truth ?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...yndication=rss
Do White People Lie : To Pollsters or even to Themselves :
About their willingness to Vote for Black Candidates ?
- - - Reality Sucks - YES !

Obama and the Wilder or Bradley Effect . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_effect

Barack Obama and the "Reverse" Bradley Effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley...Bradley_effect
Just Might Happen in Reverse - Anything is Possible . . .

The Bradley Effect : Many White Voters Talk About
Voting for Obama, but in the Voting Booth . . .
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/12346

In so-called White America : The Race Issue Isn't Going Away
http://online.wsj.com/public/article...977608809.html

The Obama Effect : Can It Trancend Race in 2008 ?
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071231/younge/
Obama 2008 -versus- Jackson 1984/88
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/behin...kson_1988.html

Will Barack Hussein Obama II's Election as the US
President Mean America Has Over Come Racism ?
-or- Will Barack Hussein Obama II's Failure to be
Elected US President Mean America Is Still Racist ?

DO - White Voters Deserve More Credit . . . in 2008 ?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-...e_b_83604.html


maybe the day after . . . in the bright light of a new day
a new beginning on nov 5 2008 : the people of america . . .
will have some answers about race in america ~ RHF

On Aug 14, 11:05*pm, wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:53*pm, wrote:

- SO, Obama Looks *funny

- And He Has a Funny name

- And He doesn't look like the old drunks down at the Bar

- So , everyone votes for John McCain..

What does *that mean for the next four years for The United States of
America..

*..

Dream on.

http://www.watoday.com.au/world/no-c...e-an-obama-lan...

McCain is by far the best candidate the GOP could have put up, but
even with his appeal to independents, Bush has screwed up America so
badly that it stinks from half a world away, and the voters are only
waking up to that more and more with each passing month.

Think 1980, when the country experienced a massive backlash against a
government that had gone too far left, and had failed its citizens.
Today, there is an equally powerful backlash against a government that
has gone equally way-too-far right, and it's going to fuel very
*interesting* turn-out patterns that will confound all the pollsters
and their historically-based "likely voter" turnout calculations.

- Obama in a landslide.

-or- Covered by One . . .

dxAce wrote:


Wait! Are the Liberal/DemocratMarxists going with the Popular Vote this time around or the Electoral Vote? Or.. are they going to
decide AFTER the election which one they want?

Why do you hate America?

How do you justify calling someone a Marxist? What proof do you have?

(As usual, I don't expect a cogent response.)

RHF wrote:
(frantic scramble excised)
.
Roy, are you a racist? Or just a scared white guy?

I'm not a fan of Obama, but I am 100% certain McCain would be a worse
president than Bush 43. Therefore, I support Bob Barr, as he will drain
votes from McCain. The Ross Perot of 2008.

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Wait! Are the Liberal/DemocratMarxists going with the Popular Vote this time around or the Electoral Vote? Or.. are they going to
decide AFTER the election which one they want?

Why do you hate America?

I love America, boy!


How do you justify calling someone a Marxist?

Because they tend to lean that way?

What proof do you have?

They tend to lean that way?


(As usual, I don't expect a cogent response.)

What I DO expect from you is total idiocy.

Now toddle along, boy.


So McCain is a Fascist because he tends to lean that way?