Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , Tom is clairying that the dynamic range of the FM system vs. the dynamic range of the program content broadcasters put into the system. As Tom says, about 95% of the time the material on air is somewhere in the vicinity of a 6 db dynamic range. Good thing he clarified that for you. You were looking pretty stupid. No, he clarified for you that the system may be capable of much wider dynamic range, but radio stations reduce the range of the content due to the requirements of the market. I had been saying all along that Brenda Ann's assesment of a dynamic range of about 6 db is the norm for program content, not for the system. A Porsche may be capable of 200 MPH, but the reality of the smoothness of roads, other traffic and legal restrictions makes the average owner keep it to 60 to 80 MPH at the top. FM is capable of a very wide dynamic range. Reality forces stations to limit the range of content. Hey there 6 dB man, he saved your lying butt. He saved your misinterpretation of the facts. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I love reading iBiquitys announcements about hybrid digital radio | Shortwave | |||
The Problem With Hybrid Digital | Shortwave | |||
Anyone know why AM Radio "Hybrid Digital" sounds so bad? | Shortwave | |||
Screw HD Radio iBiquity Digital | Shortwave | |||
HD Hybrid Digital radio. Satellite sirius and xm radio. | Shortwave |