Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote: On Jan 3, 8:40�am, dxAce wrote: Michael "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote: On Jan 3, 5:49 am, dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... While I've not seen a copy of the announcement, I seem to recall hearing that no mention was made in said announcement as to where the birth took place. In the paper, I suppose, one could merely announce that "Mr. and Mrs. XYZ would like to announce the birth of a son, 'BongoDrum', on April 1st". Pretty close to that: Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaoie Hwy., Son, Aug. 4. From the Sunday Advertiser, Aug. 13, 1961, Pp. B-6, Health Bureau Statistics (which infers to me that it was not the parents, but the state/county Health Bureau that sent the information to the paper. And that could perhaps only be a case of them (the Obama's) going to the state/county and registering said birth. Note that no mention being made of the *location* of said birth. Could be interesting to say the least if at some point in time it were to be discovered that Barry was not born in the USA. Looking forward to the riots, dxAce Michigan USA- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe you should pursue some education of yourself, Steve. Nah, think I'll just lie about having a PhD like you did, boy! Your grasp of the issue isn't very sharp. Better than yours, boy! Why would America riot if Obama wasn't born in the US? America, or certain ahem elements within the USA? Are you saying you'd be rioting? No, learn some comprehension skills, oh faux one. That might really pump up military recruitment! Yep, it just might.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, the quality of your one-liners certainly hasn't improven. And the real issue isn't whether he was born on US soil. BrendaAnn is right - I think most of these challenges to Obama's citizenship do assume an incredible amount of collaboration and conspiracy to cover-up a foreign birth. I do think, however, that the Donofrio (Google it, Steve) variant of the Berg challenge is a better route if you really want to press a case. That variant admits he was born in Hawaii, but claims he was a British citizen, since his father was a British citizen, as Kenya was a British commonwealth at Obama's birth. The reason his mother didn't make him American was a law, now overturned and no longer in effect, that, in effect caused his mother to have forfeited her US citizenship by marrying a foreign citizen, at her age, something about "5 years past 14." In other words, his mother was a few months too young to legally still be considered a US citizen, thus being unable to pass US citizenship rights to Obama. Convoluted and reliant on a law that was replaced only a year or so after Obama's birth. The Supreme Court ignored the argument and dismissed the case for lack of standing. I've heard some very technical and legalistic discussions on this case and while I can understand why the Supreme Court won't attempt to overrule a popular election, there might be a defendable legal case buried in there... Nineteen out of twenty media references to this case don't explain the exact chain of logic laid out in the case. It has nothing to do with fake birth certificates or whether he was born in Kenya or Indonesia. Indonesia? Heck, you'd better study up, fake PhD Boy! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|