Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 23, 9:57*am, wrote:
Struble - One of the reasons why your crap digital radio is crashing and burning is because you have to "approved" it as manufacturer. Imagine that. And then you make a big deal about it! As if it's a real big honor to be *"iBiquity approved". *Really, what a joke. Ill bet most manufacturers don't want to go through the trouble of being "approved" by you. (Especially since no one wants it anyway - why bother) Think about it. I know it's software and firmware driven but it's still just radio trashbag. *No matter how many tricks it can do it's still essentially radio. I "approve" of this message. Buy another radio for what? to hear the exact same content found on AM/ FM. Plus the coverage isn't great unless, it's a 100,000 watt stick.. Even 6,000 watts of Fm in stereo is scratchy.. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
friend's ipod with commercials wrote:
Even 6,000 watts of Fm in stereo is scratchy.. Oooh; don't tell these guys: http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....DNumber=264236 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 23, 2:03*pm, dave wrote:
friend's ipod with commercials wrote: Even 6,000 watts of Fm in stereo is scratchy.. Oooh; don't tell these guys: http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....=FM&tabSearchT.... they know |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dave" wrote in message m... friend's ipod with commercials wrote: Even 6,000 watts of Fm in stereo is scratchy.. Oooh; don't tell these guys: http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....DNumber=264236 HAAT of the antenna structure makes a lot more difference than EIRP. With antenna heights approaching 2000' HAAT, the Portland, OR FM's put a good stereo signal out to about 20 miles when running only their 10W exciters (which has been done on a few occasions when mains power was out over a wide area for an extended time). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "dave" wrote in message m... friend's ipod with commercials wrote: Even 6,000 watts of Fm in stereo is scratchy.. Oooh; don't tell these guys: http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....DNumber=264236 HAAT of the antenna structure makes a lot more difference than EIRP. True to some extent. I was involved with a station in the LA area that had 500 watts at over 1000 feet, HAAT, and about 2000 feet over the LA Basin. What we had was a bad signal over a very large area, We went off the side of a mountain, down to to 300 feet at 6 kw, and the ratings with the same format trippled. I had to fight some folks who just looked at maps and did not understand how radio is listened to in order to ram this through. In this case, power was much more important, as below a certain power level, height gets coverage without any intensity. With antenna heights approaching 2000' HAAT, the Portland, OR FM's put a good stereo signal out to about 20 miles when running only their 10W exciters (which has been done on a few occasions when mains power was out over a wide area for an extended time). And likely nobody was listening... that is too little power to generate any audinece. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Eduardo" wrote in message news ![]() With antenna heights approaching 2000' HAAT, the Portland, OR FM's put a good stereo signal out to about 20 miles when running only their 10W exciters (which has been done on a few occasions when mains power was out over a wide area for an extended time). And likely nobody was listening... that is too little power to generate any audinece. I doubt they lost any significant number of listeners in the metro area, since all stations at that point were on an equal playing field, and already had their audiences. I know that at my place on the far east end of the county I noticed absolutely no difference in signal quality. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message news ![]() With antenna heights approaching 2000' HAAT, the Portland, OR FM's put a good stereo signal out to about 20 miles when running only their 10W exciters (which has been done on a few occasions when mains power was out over a wide area for an extended time). And likely nobody was listening... that is too little power to generate any audinece. I doubt they lost any significant number of listeners in the metro area, since all stations at that point were on an equal playing field, and already had their audiences. I know that at my place on the far east end of the county I noticed absolutely no difference in signal quality. Laws of Physics step in here... the average home or at work listener's receiver is not sensitive enough to pick up much under a 65 to near 70 dbu signal, so they weren't listening to anything. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message news ![]() With antenna heights approaching 2000' HAAT, the Portland, OR FM's put a good stereo signal out to about 20 miles when running only their 10W exciters (which has been done on a few occasions when mains power was out over a wide area for an extended time). And likely nobody was listening... that is too little power to generate any audinece. I doubt they lost any significant number of listeners in the metro area, since all stations at that point were on an equal playing field, and already had their audiences. I know that at my place on the far east end of the county I noticed absolutely no difference in signal quality. Laws of Physics step in here... the average home or at work listener's receiver is not sensitive enough to pick up much under a 65 to near 70 dbu signal, so they weren't listening to anything. I hate to tell you this, because you will simply deny it anyway... but here in Korea, there are only a few full power stations, most of those in Seoul, Deagu and Busan. The rest of the country is served by literally hundreds, perhaps thousands, of 20-40 watt translators. Most of the translators can be heard very easily in many towns/villes on cheap pocket radios and mp3 players that have FM radios in them. I can personally sit here in my house (houses here are almost 100% made from concrete and steel rebar) and hear at least 4 translators for EACH of the network stations (KBS, MBC, CBS, etc.), with the closest of those being about 12 Km away in Pyeongtaek, and all of this on a little Sony pocket radio. There are three AFN plants that can be heard as well: the local one, 5 Km away at the back of our base, running 40 watts, one from Osan, about 15Km away, running 30 watts, and the "big" one in Seoul, 80 Km away, running a whopping huge 1200 watts! I don't know what sort of oddball signal black hole you have there, but in the rest of the real world, low power does work. Also, I'm sure you know that there are many places on the east coast where a 6KW plant is as big as it gets.. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eduardo - iBiquity layoffs, despite Bob's "strong momentum"!!!!!!! | Shortwave | |||
IBiquity - Where's the "HD" in "HD" radio? | CB | |||
Did a "Robert J. Struble Ibiquity" word search on Yahoo | Shortwave | |||
IBOC : iBiquity "HD" AM & FM Radio related Posts and Replies -by-RHF | Shortwave | |||
IBOC : iBiquity "HD" AM & FM Radio related Posts and Replies -by- RHF | Shortwave |