"Booble" wrote in message
...

The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic
Broadcasting is #18.

Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It
ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago.

Notice hit #29 from the DOJ.

Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or
check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't
find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do
not peruse those sites.

The second section
are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4.

Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend
machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless
cards, are personal accounts.

I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a
company that has not existed for nearly 6 years.

This was run on Friday. LOL!

I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to
believe your own fabrications.

You're a kick to spar with.

On Jul 12, 12:57�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message

...

The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic
Broadcasting is #18.

Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It
ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago.

Notice hit #29 from the DOJ.

Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or
check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't
find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do
not peruse those sites.

The second section
are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4.

Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend
machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless
cards, are personal accounts.

I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a
company that has not existed for nearly 6 years.

This was run on Friday. LOL!

I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to
believe your own fabrications.

You're a kick to spar with.

"The Real Story"

"What many forget is that using this much bandwidth has always been
permitted within the defined AM channel bandpass of FCC Rules and NRSC
mask limits. Ibiquity is very much aware that the digital sidebands
contain higher average energy than analog splatter and can become
significant interference. Accordingly, it's been proposing more
restrictive specifications for the HD Radio transmissions mask that
afford much more protection for third adjacent channel stations than
currently required under FCC Rule 73.44."

http://www.radioworld.com/section/section/article/1842

And, that iBiquity took advantage of the loophole in FCC Rule 73.44,
in order to jam adjacents off the dial?

"Booble" wrote in message
...

And, that iBiquity took advantage of the loophole in FCC Rule 73.44,
in order to jam adjacents off the dial?

They could "jam" AMs in the same market, and it would not make a difference.
AM is dead.

The leading authority on stations, valuations and facilities lists 1761 AMs
in the top 100 markets. Of these, 208 are listed as "viable" meaning they
have adequate signal day and night to compete. That means there are an
average of 2 decent AMs per market in the top 100 cities of the US... while
there are an average of 11 viable FMs per market. And that is why today's
only broadly successful formats on AM, talk and sports, are migrating in
nearly every market to FM.

The Koreans could jam the entire band and 95% of the radio listeners under
50 would never notice.

On Jul 12, 12:57�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message

...

The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic
Broadcasting is #18.

Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It
ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago.

Notice hit #29 from the DOJ.

Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or
check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't
find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do
not peruse those sites.

The second section
are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4.

Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend
machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless
cards, are personal accounts.

I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a
company that has not existed for nearly 6 years.

This was run on Friday. LOL!

I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to
believe your own fabrications.

You're a kick to spar with.

"Broadcasters lose in court over low-power FM radio"

"An appeals court has rebuked a bid to stop the FCC from protecting
Low Power FM stations from big station signal interference. The next
step is getting Congress to green light an expansion of the service...
There could be a lot more of these stations on the FM dial, but when
the FCC first authorized the service in 2000, the NAB and National
Public Radio claimed that they would interfere with full-power
signals, and got Congress to force a 'third adjacent rule' on the
service. No LPFMs could be licensed within three channels to the left
or right of a big signal station, for the most part limiting the
concept to less urbanized areas... But whatever happens, Friday's
court decision is clearly part of a momentum building towards an
expanded LPFM service. Ars asked the NAB for a comment on the ruling.
We received no reply."

http://tinyurl.com/pvrznw

Too bad, you "Big Boys" failed to stop the FCC from protecting LPFM -
how interesting, this happened right before the FCC will approve the
FM-HD power increase.

On Jul 12, 12:57*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message

...

The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic
Broadcasting is #18.

Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It
ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago.

Notice hit #29 from the DOJ.

Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or
check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't
find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do
not peruse those sites.

The second section
are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4.

Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend
machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless
cards, are personal accounts.

I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a
company that has not existed for nearly 6 years.

This was run on Friday. LOL!

I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to
believe your own fabrications.

You're a kick to spar with.

"The Wonderful World of HD Radio"

"Perhaps it is because it is the American Public that has been paying
a large portion of the development costs for HD radio? Yup, that is
you and I. An FCC filing from North Carolina’s Public Radio Stations
cites: Just a few weeks ago, the House Appropriations Committee
approved an additional $40 million to assist public radio stations’
transition to HD radio technology.”

http://tinyurl.com/57ksx6

"DEAD AIR: Radio's great leap forward stalling in the Valley"

"KMBH, the National Public Radio affiliate based in Harlingen,
switched to HD this year, but the change did not boost its
inconsistent analog signal in the upper Valley. Monsignor Pedro
Briseño, the manager of the station and its television affiliate, did
not return multiple calls and an e-mail requesting comment on the
station’s shift. A fundraising campaign on the station asked local
listeners to contribute to the upgrade earlier this year, touting the
change as a service to listeners that would improve their experience.
The station’s business manager said she could not reveal the cost of
the upgrade, saying all media requests have to be routed to Briseño. A
public information request faxed to the station Monday evening has not
yet received a response. Organizations that receive government funding
are subject to state and federal open records laws, but have seven
business days to respond to information requests."

http://tinyurl.com/6gwdj4

The NPR is the biggest fraudster of all of you.