Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChrisCoaster" wrote in message ... On Sep 14, 7:12 pm, Bob Dobbs wrote: ChrisCoaster wrote: So pretty much, if one is using the tones from a RELIABLE radio station, they can count on setting their watch approximately 5-10 seconds ahead(of that station) and probably be very close to WWVB or WWVH. Why not make that 'reliable' station WWV to start with? -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 ___________________ Again, you and I are not "average" off-the-air consumers. I should have clarified my statement "if {{an average Joe/Jane}} is using the tones from {{1010 wins}}," Then synch timepiece to slightly ahead of the tone from the station. I should be noted that those of us who are SWL's or AMBCB DX'ers (a form of nerd) are much more concerned with the "exact" time, whereas the vast majority of people on Earth find +/- 5 minutes to be quite adequate. Some even far less than that (folks here figure if they show up to work less than half an hour late, they're still considered to be "on time") |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Signals Fading From Shortwave Bands | Antenna | |||
Propagation Sucks No Time Signals stations | Shortwave | |||
60kHz time signals in Israel? | Shortwave | |||
Decoding SSB/Shortwave signals using my soundcard and PC ? | Shortwave | |||
Shortwave signals on a simple $5.00 portable am-fm receiver? | Shortwave |