Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jo Jo Gunn wrote:
"John Higdon" wrote in message ... In article , "Watchin & Waitin'" wrote: HD is just another option/choice. Choices are a good thing. Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other stations. I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done and are currently in progress. I am more up-to date than you could imagine. There has been no widespread interference complaints from the public...and virtually all stations are protected within their contours. Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area. Stereo destroys FM coverage. Those engineers were right. People don't complain as much as they just find other things to listen to. Digital sidebands increase analog channel noise. That is a fact. Now if they were to quit trying to do stereo in the analog channel, that might work. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dave" wrote in message ... Jo Jo Gunn wrote: "John Higdon" wrote in message ... In article , "Watchin & Waitin'" wrote: HD is just another option/choice. Choices are a good thing. Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other stations. I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done and are currently in progress. I am more up-to date than you could imagine. There has been no widespread interference complaints from the public...and virtually all stations are protected within their contours. Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area. Stereo destroys FM coverage. Those engineers were right. Stereo multiplexing in and of itself does no damage to the coverage area. Listening on a monaural receiver or in mono mode with a stereo receiver gives the same coverage as a monaural transmitter would. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dave" wrote in message ... Jo Jo Gunn wrote: "John Higdon" wrote in message ... In article , "Watchin & Waitin'" wrote: HD is just another option/choice. Choices are a good thing. Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other stations. I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done and are currently in progress. I am more up-to date than you could imagine. There has been no widespread interference complaints from the public...and virtually all stations are protected within their contours. Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area. Stereo destroys FM coverage. Those engineers were right. And those that were purists and held to that belief....are all out of business. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
JUMP TEAM RADIO OPERATORS NEEDED | Policy | |||
Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS this saturday 10a | Digital | |||
Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS thiss... | Scanner | |||
Amateur Radio BPL Team to Stress Credibility | Shortwave |