On Oct 27, 7:29*am, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

...



Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:

More or less, a serious illness can drive treatment costs up to the
value of a new car, and not even treat the condition, which is the
point I am driving at. * Common sense tells you that you can't saddle
your government with those kind of expenditures and expect to not have
problems.

Health care was not meant to be mandated by the government, health
care was simply that act of God that is not meant to be regulated by
government. *What's next, we all need cars, we all need homes, we all
need college educations, we all need foreign travel to different
countries to learn how to integrate into the "world community"?

You could say the same about the military.

You have a real insincere quality. *I think of you as a lagging weather
vane.

My personal belief is that health care goes along with that whole life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. *Cars, education, and foreign travel
are perks, not rights. Homes... well, shelter is one of the three basic
needs to preserve life, but people have lived over the centuries in open
caves, straw huts, wooden shacks, frame houses, igloos. People still live in
the three latter, plus the occasional cardboard box or bridge.. Were it up
to me, all vacant buildings in inner cities would be converted to indigent
housing, with a requirement for some form of recompense (community service,
etc.) from those who live there, and a legitimate effort thereby to better
their own lot. But then, I'm not likely to ever have my way.

Yes, exactly Brenda Ann. Lump in health care with that pursuit of
happiness clause. If it makes you happy to have health care then go
out and pursue a job that compensates well enough and pay for it
yourself. Don't take my hard earned money away from me in order to
pay for your gosh darn health care. You go to school and study hard
and you will do well. If a person is developmentally challenged then
no problem, we all chip in and take care of him/her. If the person
****ed off in school and never studied then he gets what he deserves -
no health care.

regards,
NEO

N9NEO wrote:
On Oct 27, 7:29 am, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

...



Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:
More or less, a serious illness can drive treatment costs up to the
value of a new car, and not even treat the condition, which is the
point I am driving at. Common sense tells you that you can't saddle
your government with those kind of expenditures and expect to not have
problems.
Health care was not meant to be mandated by the government, health
care was simply that act of God that is not meant to be regulated by
government. What's next, we all need cars, we all need homes, we all
need college educations, we all need foreign travel to different
countries to learn how to integrate into the "world community"?
You could say the same about the military.
You have a real insincere quality. I think of you as a lagging weather
vane.
My personal belief is that health care goes along with that whole life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. Cars, education, and foreign travel
are perks, not rights. Homes... well, shelter is one of the three basic
needs to preserve life, but people have lived over the centuries in open
caves, straw huts, wooden shacks, frame houses, igloos. People still live in
the three latter, plus the occasional cardboard box or bridge.. Were it up
to me, all vacant buildings in inner cities would be converted to indigent
housing, with a requirement for some form of recompense (community service,
etc.) from those who live there, and a legitimate effort thereby to better
their own lot. But then, I'm not likely to ever have my way.

Yes, exactly Brenda Ann. Lump in health care with that pursuit of
happiness clause. If it makes you happy to have health care then go
out and pursue a job that compensates well enough and pay for it
yourself. Don't take my hard earned money away from me in order to
pay for your gosh darn health care. You go to school and study hard
and you will do well. If a person is developmentally challenged then
no problem, we all chip in and take care of him/her. If the person
****ed off in school and never studied then he gets what he deserves -
no health care.


That's just plain mean. No wonder this country is over.

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:59:03 -0700, N9NEO wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:29Â*am, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

...


My personal belief is that health care goes along with that whole life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. Â*Cars, education, and foreign
travel are perks, not rights. Homes... well, shelter is one of the
three basic needs to preserve life, but people have lived over the
centuries in open caves, straw huts, wooden shacks, frame houses,
igloos. People still live in the three latter, plus the occasional
cardboard box or bridge.. Were it up to me, all vacant buildings in
inner cities would be converted to indigent housing, with a requirement
for some form of recompense (community service, etc.) from those who
live there, and a legitimate effort thereby to better their own lot.
But then, I'm not likely to ever have my way.

Yes, exactly Brenda Ann. Lump in health care with that pursuit of
happiness clause. If it makes you happy to have health care then go out
and pursue a job that compensates well enough and pay for it yourself.
Don't take my hard earned money away from me in order to pay for your
gosh darn health care. You go to school and study hard and you will do
well. If a person is developmentally challenged then no problem, we all
chip in and take care of him/her. If the person ****ed off in school
and never studied then he gets what he deserves - no health care.

regards,
NEO

All is good for you until you get cancer and loose your job, house and
insurance. Then you will demand the government owes you something.

Or will you simply pack you grocery cart and leave willingly? I drought
that.

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:59:03 -0700, N9NEO wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:29Â*am, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

...


My personal belief is that health care goes along with that whole life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. Â*Cars, education, and foreign
travel are perks, not rights. Homes... well, shelter is one of the
three basic needs to preserve life, but people have lived over the
centuries in open caves, straw huts, wooden shacks, frame houses,
igloos. People still live in the three latter, plus the occasional
cardboard box or bridge.. Were it up to me, all vacant buildings in
inner cities would be converted to indigent housing, with a requirement
for some form of recompense (community service, etc.) from those who
live there, and a legitimate effort thereby to better their own lot.
But then, I'm not likely to ever have my way.

Yes, exactly Brenda Ann. Lump in health care with that pursuit of
happiness clause. If it makes you happy to have health care then go out
and pursue a job that compensates well enough and pay for it yourself.
Don't take my hard earned money away from me in order to pay for your
gosh darn health care. You go to school and study hard and you will do
well. If a person is developmentally challenged then no problem, we all
chip in and take care of him/her. If the person ****ed off in school
and never studied then he gets what he deserves - no health care.

regards,
NEO

All is good for you until you get cancer and loose your job, house and
insurance. Then you will demand the government owes you something.

Or will you simply pack you grocery cart and leave willingly? I drought
that.

On Nov 1, 2:10*pm, Ima wrote:


I drought that.

Sort of a Biblical Flood in reverse, eh?

And three times over, to boot!

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:59:03 -0700, N9NEO wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:29Â*am, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

...


My personal belief is that health care goes along with that whole life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. Â*Cars, education, and foreign
travel are perks, not rights. Homes... well, shelter is one of the
three basic needs to preserve life, but people have lived over the
centuries in open caves, straw huts, wooden shacks, frame houses,
igloos. People still live in the three latter, plus the occasional
cardboard box or bridge.. Were it up to me, all vacant buildings in
inner cities would be converted to indigent housing, with a requirement
for some form of recompense (community service, etc.) from those who
live there, and a legitimate effort thereby to better their own lot.
But then, I'm not likely to ever have my way.

Yes, exactly Brenda Ann. Lump in health care with that pursuit of
happiness clause. If it makes you happy to have health care then go out
and pursue a job that compensates well enough and pay for it yourself.
Don't take my hard earned money away from me in order to pay for your
gosh darn health care. You go to school and study hard and you will do
well. If a person is developmentally challenged then no problem, we all
chip in and take care of him/her. If the person ****ed off in school
and never studied then he gets what he deserves - no health care.

regards,
NEO

All is good for you until you get cancer and loose your job, house and
insurance. Then like a hypocrite, you will demand the government owes you
something.

Or will you simply pack you grocery cart and leave willingly? I drought
that.