To rub your nose in your new found affection for those that kill
Americans? So that jurists could be stalked by arab cab drivers in
their spare time? A jury of officers in the US military is not
educated, not objective enough, in a tribunal?

Military officers spend hundreds of hours in training, and have
college educations? A civilian jury member only has to have a basic
qualification of what, a voter registration card? Does the phrase
"rub your nose in it" ring a bell?

Does the phrase "coward" mean anything, to anyone?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.5, dated Nov
7th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this new
version applies)

The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include
all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the
following disclaimer and conditions:

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other
limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at
the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of any type of electronic or written
communications system, including all parties, who may technically
intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions
beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those
communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author,
and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possession of the original author.

d) Any reference to copyrighted material is done in the spirit of fair
use, to illustrate the context of a discussion regarding public events
for reference purposes that adds to the conversation, for which that
discussion constitutes a new and separate piece of intellectual
property, for which the referenced copyrighted material can not convey
by itself, and that the author reserves the right to retain any
profits from the newly created intellectual property. This term also
serves to promote the referenced copyrighted material, without
necessarily endorsing the material for any particular fitness, use, or
purpose, for which the purpose of fair use referral law was created
for, through inclusion of a partial, but not whole, body of works that
the copyright fair use reference applies, for which the intent of all
terms of this disclaimer apply to that reference of a copyrighted
work.

e) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

f) The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

g) It is the opinion of the author that you respect people when you
consider their views, by reflecting their thoughts or actions against
your own, which may include use of language that conveys an emotional
depth that is to be imagined, but not enacted through use of language
that accurately, or inaccurately describes the situation,
circumstance, or idea, which does not imply that any action occur
other than the consideration of the thought, for which beyond the
author has no control, or liability for the action of the reader as
presented in all terms of this diclaimer, and may simply be the
venting of emotions with the intent of no consequence by the author to
an audience the author assumes will understand the message and intent,
and wishes to hear those views.

h) Since all intellectual property, discussions and other
communications this disclaimer applies to, either in written, or
electronic form, subscribe to the terms described in paragraph (e) and
(g) of this disclaimer, under no circumstances are any communications
meant to violate the terms of any electronic harassment laws which
include the word “harm”, for which the author understands to be
limited to the definition of physical harm (not self inflicted mental
harm) that requires immediate medical attention based solely or in
part by the communications of the author, regardless of whether the
author chooses to remain anonymous or not.

i) It is the intention and opinion of the author that History is full
of individuals that are not harmed by criticism, and in fact such
criticism can motivate and inspire them to prove their critics wrong.
Based on this historical evidence, any alleged mental harm amounts to
self inflicted injury not treatable by either medical or other
professionals (despite the fact that many people live from the profits
of lies through gradual illusion, without judicial interference), for
which the author has no control over the mental development of any
potential reader prior to the discovery or reading of the material for
which this disclaimer applies, as evident by the necessity that speech
is to be protected by law as determined by the founders of the United
States of America, who, in the opinion of the author, wrote the legal
framework, which was created by God, not slaves.

j) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) or advertisements may be licensed by
www.google.com, for bandwidth verification, or determination of
potential advertisement opportunities subject to all other terms
described in this disclaimer.

k) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are any electronic
links that may transport the reader to other web pages, sites, or
computers, and such links that may be provided for all or any of the
following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to,
informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right
credit referral information under the terms outlined in the conditions
applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under
US Copy Right Law, and for which the author assumes no liability for
any particular use, fitness, or legality there of, any link, current,
past, or future, which the reader should use at their sole risk, with
no liability to the author, or any other party that may store,
transmit, or otherwise facilitate use of the material for which this
disclaimer applies.

l) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information which preclude the use and
need for excessive government regulation that burdens business with
obstacles it may sense that it can not overcome without inflicting
harm on the business plan or survival ability of the business to
provide advertised, goods and or services.

m) Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 or 1.4 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of
the author that “blogging” is another definition for a potentially
infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the
author will retroactively apply this version, 1.5 to all forms of
previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows,
in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to
demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not
enthusiastically pursue getting high on cocaine as often as possible
as Barack Hussein Obama has admitted in his book (paraphrase,
synopsis), according to (mmm, mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson
Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic emphasis)).

n) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!

o) This disclaimer is meant to establish the intent of the author who
may participate in message forums, or create other written or
electronic forms of communication to comply with current law, and may
be revoked without prior notice, due to circumstances beyond the
author's control, changes in the law, or for any of the purposes,
terms, or conditions that may be in effect or described by this
disclaimer, or to changes in this disclaimer that the author may
clarify in a revised version of this disclaimer.

p) This disclaimer is attached to this message, and retroactively
applies to all previous forms of communication by the author, and is
done so because there is no recognized central suppository of a public
disclaimer recognized by the Government of the United States to the
author, and as such, the legal imperative of the author is to apply
this disclaimer to all manner of correspondence as the author seems
fit or prudent, so that no misunderstandings occur, or to comply with
past, current or future revisions of the law, due to any of, but not
limited to, any or all of the terms, partial terms, or combination of
terms, of this disclaimer, which is derived from the freedom of
speech, for it appears to the author that the zeal of lawmakers to
take away free speech outweigh the providence of attaching this
disclaimer to all correspondence for which this applies, and any
inconvenience for which this presents, is the result of simply
complying with the law, and not to inconvenience the reader.

Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options

Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York?

BTW,. aren't you glad Bush captured Bin Laden and put him on trial?

DW wrote:
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options

Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York?


By the time the towers fell, most of the country was tuned in. We were
all New Yorkers that day.

www.devilfinder.com
Black Day 911
cuhulin

"dave" wrote in message
...
DW wrote:
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options

Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York?


By the time the towers fell, most of the country was tuned in. We were
all New Yorkers that day.

Except Bush - He was drunk, chasing Mayerr JulieAnnie in the WH bedroom.

On Nov 14, 12:52*am, DW wrote:
*Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options

Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York?

BTW,. aren't you glad Bush captured Bin Laden and put him on trial?

Nice of the Oblama white House to put NYC back in the cross hairs in
an even bigger way than it always is anyway. Should be quite the
worldwide spectacle and the militant muslim loons will be wanting to
make another splash during it. Might as well put NY on highest terror
alert for the multi-month trial. A full defense will include all the
crackpot conspiracy theories being trotted out. They just gave the
extremists the largest publicity forum on earth. Nice move, O.

How LOWWWWWWW Can Five Names Born in Kenya!
DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB
ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSS Go?
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278215
cuhulin

On Nov 14, 4:03*pm, CliffB wrote:


Nice of the Oblama white House to put NYC back in the cross hairs in
an even bigger way than it always is anyway.

As if it were possible to increase the danger. (Hint: nutjob
religious fanatics don't get nuttier any more than you can fill a
water glass past the top: full is full.)

For a typical example, refer to any handy mirror.

On Nov 14, 4:03*pm, CliffB wrote:
On Nov 14, 12:52*am, DW wrote:

*Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options

Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York?

BTW,. aren't you glad Bush captured Bin Laden and put him on trial?

Nice of the Oblama white House to put NYC back in the cross hairs in
an even bigger way than it always is anyway. Should be quite the
worldwide spectacle and the militant muslim loons will be wanting to
make another splash during it. Might as well put NY on highest terror
alert for the multi-month trial. A full defense will include all the
crackpot conspiracy theories being trotted out. They just gave the
extremists the largest publicity forum on earth. Nice move, O.

Looks like Prez Obama's US AG Eric Holder is
trying hard to make Obama a one term president
and cost the Democrats control of both the US
House and US Senate in the next Elections.

? Has US AG Eric Holder Give The Republicans
the 2010 and 2012 Elections ?

Trying Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist WAR CRIMINALS
{Foreign Mass Murderers} as everyday Civilian
Criminals : Begs Disaster {Attacks} to Happen
Again in New York City.

The US Congress passed Laws to Try all these
Non-Combatant Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist WAR
CRIMINALS -via- a Military Tribunal System :
But the Obama-Regime© seams to Ignore this
Law and the Public Safety of the Citizens of New
York City.

Another Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist Attack on New
York City might have happen some day -but- Now
an Attack on NYC is certain to Happen one day
in the next Year or two or three because of this
Trial of the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist in New York
City. {Holder Is Inviting Disaster To Happen}

Some Attack {Any Attack} on/in New York City
during the Trial will be BLAMED on the Trial and
Holder and on Prez Obama -then- Prez Obama
and the Democrats will Pay for this Mistake and
Inviting another Attack in Elections of 2010, 2011
and 2012. {BHO's Re-Election}

The Any Attack Scenario :
The Attack by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists
could be on many 'soft-targets' within NYC that
will produce High Body Counts and Video Images
of Destruction for the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist
and the World Media will gladly run the Videos
around the World 24/7 showing the Death and
Destruction. This will be Great Propaganda for
the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists -but- Make Prez
Obama and the Obama-Regime© to appear to
be Foolish and Stupid for Inviting the Attacks
once again on NYC.
-wrt- 2005 London UK Subway and Bus Attacks
by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_...ondon_bombings

The Courts Attack Scenario :
Worse for Prez Obama and the Obama-Regime©
would be a Direct Attack on the NYC Federal Court
House. The Attack could be a stand-off-attack on
the US Federal Court building from four-or-more
nearby adjacent buildings that the Islam-O-Fascist
Terrorists can easily see the Court Room Floor that
the Trial is being held on with any variant of RPGs.
The US Federal Government has to Defend the
Whole Building and it's perimeter -while- all the
Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists have to do to make
the 24/7 News Headlines around the World is
Hit the Court Building on all four sides to have a
Terror Propaganda Victory and Bad News for the
USA and NYC.

IMHO - US AG Eric Holder has make the US
Federal Courts Building in NYC the new PRIME
TARGET {Ground-Zero} for every Islam-O-Fascist
Terrorist on this Planet Earth to Attack.
-note- Remember to the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists
those on Trial will Die as Martyrs for Islam.
-obtw- These same Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists will
'see' the failure of Prez Obama to get re-elected
in 2012 as a Result of these Attacks as another
Propaganda Victory for their Jihad cause any
Attack on NYC during the Trial will Impact the
US Elections in 2010 and 2012.
-omg- Holder may just have given the Republicans
control of the US House and the US Senate in
2010 and put a Republican in the White House
in 2012.

HEY US AG ERIC HOLDER JUST MAY BE
YOU SHOULD RETHINK THIS ONE ~ RHF
-hint- You Prosecute Criminals to Protect the
Citizens of the USA -not- To Put The Citizens
of NYC & the USA at Risk of Terrorist Attacks
by Islamic Jihadists.
-tip- A US Military Tribunal for these Terrorist at
GITMO would have been Legal and Served Justice;
plus Protected the Citizens of the USA too.

Once in a China Blue Moon wrote:


How does it feel to be such a coward? Do you even live in New York? I guess it's
okay for you to kill Americans halfway across the world, but when your own butt
is at risk, it's time to be the big scaredy cat.


He's afraid Bin Ladin's gonna dump a colostomy bag on him.