Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 31st 09, 08:29 AM posted to alt.fan.letterman,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.politics.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote in uk.politics.misc :

Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening
"national security" states:

1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so,
90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the
same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and
occupation of our own lands.


If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop
hassling *them*...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 31st 09, 09:59 AM posted to alt.fan.letterman,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.politics.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

On 31 Dec, 07:29, Paul Hyett wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote in uk.politics.misc :



Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening
"national security" states:


1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so,
90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the
same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and
occupation of our own lands.


If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop
hassling *them*...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham


Chicken and the egg......
America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The
UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably
before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only
in the minds of some British politicians.
I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport
security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly
isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why
aren't they using it?
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 31st 09, 01:07 PM posted to alt.fan.letterman,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.politics.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

On 31 Dec, 08:59, broadssailor wrote:
On 31 Dec, 07:29, Paul Hyett wrote:



On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote in uk.politics.misc :


Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening
"national security" states:


1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so,
90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the
same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and
occupation of our own lands.


If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop
hassling *them*...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham


Chicken and the egg......
America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The
UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably
before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only
in the minds of some British politicians.
I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport
security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly
isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why
aren't they using it?


Because it's politically incorrect. I heard a live interview on You
and Yours just after that nutter. The security rep said right away
that the airports and security services need to start observing the
likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of
imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two
guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a
kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes
and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out
to drop the plane?
By the lack of our politicians actions we are all suffering by having
our liberties constantly restriced.
The terrorists are certainly winning.

McKevvy
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 1st 10, 12:36 AM posted to alt.fan.letterman,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.politics.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 344
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?


"McKevvy" wrote in message
...
.. The security rep said right away
that the airports and security services need to start observing the
likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of
imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two
guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a
kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes
and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out
to drop the plane?


It might be pointed out that in this case racial profiling based upon "a
middle eastern looking guy with shifty eyes" would not have been fruitful in
this case. What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father
notifying authorities that he could be trouble..



  #5   Report Post  
Old January 1st 10, 02:25 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

Bob Dobbs wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:
What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father
notifying authorities that he could be trouble..


Their spam detector probably deleted the warning,
thinking it was just another Nigerian 419 message.g


Exactly. They got as far as "Nigerian banker"...


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 11th 10, 12:33 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:07:28 -0800 (PST), McKevvy
wrote:
I would be happy to appear bare naked if I would need to fly to any
place if it would prevent any more fanatics that would destroy many
people for fanatics that kill for their Islamic views.
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 11th 10, 12:55 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

Mississippi World War Two Veteran to get Medal.
http://www.clarionledger.com

Backwater hick, you think so!?

GOOD on yer, World War Two Veteran, GOOD on yer.

http://www.devilfinder.com
D-Day Museum New Orleans,Louisiana
cuhulin

  #8   Report Post  
Old January 11th 10, 02:06 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

I won't fly naked, Period! In Fact, I do NOT like to fly at all, I Never
have liked to fly and I Never Ever will fly again.F... that Sh.t!!!
y'all can have it!!!

DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB
ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
RISKS A MILITARY COUP.
http://www.rense.com/general89/obam.htm

GOOD! a U.S.Military Coup would/will be a damn sight Better that what is
in place now!

Rock On, U.S.Military, ROCKKKKKKKKKKKK ONNNNNNNN,,,,,,
When the Caissons Go Rollinggggg alonggggg,,,,,,,,
Oath Keepers.
cuhulin

  #9   Report Post  
Old January 11th 10, 01:08 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

aezael wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:07:28 -0800 (PST), McKevvy
wrote:
I would be happy to appear bare naked if I would need to fly to any
place if it would prevent any more fanatics that would destroy many
people for fanatics that kill for their Islamic views.


They kill because we kill.

They want us to go home.
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 11th 10, 01:10 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?

Bob Dobbs wrote:
aezael wrote:
I would be happy to appear bare naked


Where I'm from it would be called "buck nekid"
and yes, I've done my share of skinny dipping in a river,
coed no less.


I'm going to opt for the hand search. It'll almost be like having a sex
life again.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: AEA Morse machines, MM-2 & MM-3 AL GOSS Swap 0 December 16th 04 06:41 PM
MFJ 1278 and usb ports instead of serial ports. Aaron Jones General 0 July 13th 04 01:47 AM
Who's Testing the Voting Machines??? m II Shortwave 4 June 4th 04 07:06 AM
WTB Old Pinball Machines B.T. Swap 5 November 22nd 03 09:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017