Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 15, 9:30*am, Michael Black wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Bob Dobbs wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: ~~~ don't buy a SW, especially ham, receiver and expect it to perform well on the AM BCB. Why not? I didn't initially buy any of my HAM rigs for use on AMBCB, however a couple have turned out to perform very nicely there. They're very stable (TCXO), have adjustable IF bandwidth and shift, one of them has a convenient band scan to spot stations, another actually has a spectrum scope to look at the band. And even though that band is always full at night it helps to see what's out there during the day. First, there was a long period when ham equipment wasn't particularly good on AM, since most hams were using SSB. *So no wider filters for AM, sometimes there wasn't even an AM detector, and certainly no synchronous detector that everyone seems to think should be mandatory now. *I suspect that has changed a bit recently, since some of the techniques used to improve the design allows for adding better AM reception without any real cost, and a lot of the ham manufacturers like to be able to offer lots of bells and whistles, whether or not they are needed. Another obvious reason is that for a long time any receivers in amateur radio equipment covered only the ham bands. *That was a good thing, since you got much better bandspread; if you wanted general coverage you would have started with one of those to begin with. *That too has changed, now it's as easy to have a general coverage receiver as it is to have a ham band only receiver, and again it's a selling point. But, according to some, there may be attenuation that comes into play on the AM broadcast band, or some other limitation as the frequency goes down. *Or, RF amplification may be left off, so the receiver can better deal with the strong local signals. I can't really imagine a manufacturer not using the existing receiver circuitry for the AM broadcast band, since it's just a matter of extending the frequency range. *But maybe there are some out there that toss in another IC for the AM band, resulting in no special performance. *I remember getting into an argument with a local about whether their shortwave portable receiver would actually be outstanding on the FM band. *In that case, whatever great design is used on the shortwave bands is lost, since a whole different circuit is needed for FM, and thus they add a whole other FM receiver, usually an IC, which doesn't have to be anything special; you are paying extra money for the shortwave, not the FM band. But, maybe the main reason was in the paragraph about the Superradio. That one gets lost of praise, but it really is a pretty generic design. The one thing it does have is a good loopstick antenna, and that's certainly one area where ham equipment lacks. *None will have any sort of built in antenna, so one will need something external. *That may often be seen as some wire hanging off the antenna jack, and while that works, a directional antenna is pretty useful on the AM broadcast band. A receiver that has a built in antenna is going to be matched to that small antenna, while a general coverage receiver with no built in antenna may require external circuitry to best use a small antenna. * * Michael Ditto on the lack of a good antenna for BCB. As always, I suggest a Wellbrook loop. I've used the ALA100 and home brew loops for NDBs, so BCB isn't an issue. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MW DX'ing | Shortwave | |||
MW DX'ing | Shortwave | |||
MW DX'ing | Shortwave | |||
MW DX'ing | Shortwave | |||
Back to BCB DX'ing | Shortwave |