RHF wrote:
f_Latter_Day_Saints
.
* note ? Would LDS Members {Peers} be
allowed to be 'members' of the Jury ?
.

Lunatics are not entitled to a jury of their peers as lunatics. They
are allowed a jury of Northern Arizonans or Southern Utahans, depending
on the venue.

This guy is a child molesting perv. He abandons teenagers and threatens
murder. Hang his little girl raping ass.

RHF wrote:


Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church of LDS
and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...r_Da y_Saints
.

The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes. Hell, look at the
Roman Cathlicks.

dave wrote:
RHF wrote:


Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church of LDS
and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...r_Da y_Saints

.

The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes. Hell, look at the
Roman Cathlicks.


The remainder of the Abrahamic community takes offense at their exclusion.

Should they hire Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell as a public relations
director?

Perhaps Mister Robertson could also be put to good use in those
polygamist Mormon sects. One of the Elder perverts in British Columbia
has over a hundred and twenty offspring. That is *120*.

The 'wives' usually live in trailer compounds that wouldn't be a common
sight even the the most inbred of Mississippi communities.

The entire enclave of twisted SOBs survives on the monthly welfare
payments that the women get and turn over to their 'husband'. They apply
under their Maiden names.

That particular Pastoral Prick gets over 20 thousand dollars of the
public's money a MONTH because of this fraud.

Polygamy is against the law in Canada, yet the politicians are doing
nothing about it. Is it possible that the Politicians are worshiping in
the same sector of Hades?


mike





mike

m II wrote:

dave wrote:
RHF wrote:


Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church of LDS
and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...r_Da y_Saints

.

The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes. Hell, look at the
Roman Cathlicks.

The remainder of the Abrahamic community takes offense at their exclusion.

Should they hire Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell as a public relations
director?

Perhaps Mister Robertson could also be put to good use in those
polygamist Mormon sects. One of the Elder perverts in British Columbia
has over a hundred and twenty offspring. That is *120*.

The 'wives' usually live in trailer compounds that wouldn't be a common
sight even the the most inbred of Mississippi communities.

The entire enclave of twisted SOBs survives on the monthly welfare
payments that the women get and turn over to their 'husband'. They apply
under their Maiden names.

That particular Pastoral Prick gets over 20 thousand dollars of the
public's money a MONTH because of this fraud.

Polygamy is against the law in Canada, yet the politicians are doing
nothing about it. Is it possible that the Politicians are worshiping in
the same sector of Hades?

That's CanaDuh!

On Jun 11, 8:40*pm, RHF wrote:
On Jun 11, 3:09*pm, bpnjensen wrote:





On Jun 11, 3:06*pm, Gregg wrote:

On Jun 11, 11:11*am, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 11, 3:17*am, Gregg wrote:

On Jun 11, 3:57*am, dxAce wrote:

Mike "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

On Jun 10, 6:00 pm, bpnjensen wrote:
On Jun 10, 2:38 pm, Gregg wrote:

On Jun 10, 5:25 pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:18 pm, Gregg wrote:

I can't say I am surprised. Both of the two girls decided not to
testify and the prosecution said "it just wouldn't be worth it" not
verbatim - but something like that. Pretty powerful guy IMO to duck
those charges.

What do you think BA? Do you think there was a chance a sweaty palm
full of money was exchanged?

???

Do you know what I'm talking about Bruce? The LDS leader, or one of
them like BA said.

Oh, THAT guy.

Another screwball IMHO. *Who is BA?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce,

BA is BrendaAnn, a long-time group member. She's a pretty straight
shooter and I believe she had some encounters with the LDS earlier in
her life.

Mark this day on your calendar. I think Gregg and I agree that AZ
dismissal of charges against Jeffs seems fishy. But he still has to
deal with charges of child sexual abuse in TX. The FLDS can be
incredibly intimidating against any young women choosing to testify
against Jeffs.

Time to get back to the beginning of my DX vacation!

Your time would probably be better spent trying to obtain that PhD that you'd
previously lied about having.

dxAce
Michigan
USA- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

See, already broke his promise...lol. I guess in his twisted psyche,
if it's a "suck up" post it doesn't count. Now watch him try his ole'
twist and turn and shuck and jive. See, when he "plays" nice, it's all
good in his mind. "Boggles the mind" per the Prosecuting Attorney
towards MB in Utah. Scream into that tape recorder all debate
style...what a hoot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kind of an overreaction to a pretty innocuous comment...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce, you haven't had to deal with him like I have. That is how he
starts....lol. You haven't had him attacking just about everything you
post or say - be it to someone else or that is none of his business.
You got a little perturbed with his "Duh" comment to you. That's OK
though. I asked him to leave me alone / not mention me etc. etc. etc.
- like I said - I couldn't be any plainer. Anyone else would have
understood it except for maybe three others in here (not including you
into the fray however).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

YOU have the power Gregg. *All you have to do is let it be.

BpnJ - Ah The Power : Not To Play The Game

but what fun would that be . . . ~ RHF
*.

Not surprised to hear this from you!

On Jun 11, 11:35*pm, RHF wrote:
On Jun 10, 4:15*pm, Mike wrote:





On Jun 10, 6:00*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:38*pm, Gregg wrote:

On Jun 10, 5:25*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:18*pm, Gregg wrote:

I can't say I am surprised. Both of the two girls decided not to
testify and the prosecution said "it just wouldn't be worth it" not
verbatim - but something like that. Pretty powerful guy IMO to duck
those charges.

What do you think BA? Do you think there was a chance a sweaty palm
full of money was exchanged?

???

Do you know what I'm talking about Bruce? The LDS leader, or one of
them like BA said.

Oh, THAT guy.

Another screwball IMHO. *Who is BA?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce,

BA is BrendaAnn, a long-time group member. She's a pretty straight
shooter and I believe she had some encounters with the LDS earlier in
her life.

Mark this day on your calendar. I think Gregg and I agree that AZ
dismissal of charges against Jeffs seems fishy. But he still has to
deal with charges of child sexual abuse in TX. The FLDS can be
incredibly intimidating against any young women choosing to testify
against Jeffs.

Time to get back to the beginning of my DX vacation!

Mike

MWB,

How can all those 'enlightened' Progressives who
are for Gay Marriage an the Rights of Individuals
be so opposed to Polygamy and the Rights of
Individuals to any and all forms of Marriage ?

one wonders . . . ~ RHF
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good question. Obviously, communis ... er, I mean "progressives",
would be all for polygamy if the practitioners were gay.

dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
f_Latter_Day_Saints
.
* note ? Would LDS Members {Peers} be
allowed to be 'members' of the Jury ?
.

Lunatics are not entitled to a jury of their peers as lunatics. They
are allowed a jury of Northern Arizonans or Southern Utahans, depending
on the venue.

This guy is a child molesting perv. He abandons teenagers and threatens
murder. Hang his little girl raping ass.



Don't forget the underage girls taken from the US to Canada to feed
these deviant's perversions. It would appear that the defense of these
deviants comes from a person suffering from envy.


mike

On Jun 12, 11:41*am, DEFCON 88 wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:35*pm, RHF wrote:



On Jun 10, 4:15*pm, Mike wrote:

On Jun 10, 6:00*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:38*pm, Gregg wrote:

On Jun 10, 5:25*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:18*pm, Gregg wrote:

I can't say I am surprised. Both of the two girls decided not to
testify and the prosecution said "it just wouldn't be worth it" not
verbatim - but something like that. Pretty powerful guy IMO to duck
those charges.

What do you think BA? Do you think there was a chance a sweaty palm
full of money was exchanged?

???

Do you know what I'm talking about Bruce? The LDS leader, or one of
them like BA said.

Oh, THAT guy.

Another screwball IMHO. *Who is BA?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce,

BA is BrendaAnn, a long-time group member. She's a pretty straight
shooter and I believe she had some encounters with the LDS earlier in
her life.

Mark this day on your calendar. I think Gregg and I agree that AZ
dismissal of charges against Jeffs seems fishy. But he still has to
deal with charges of child sexual abuse in TX. The FLDS can be
incredibly intimidating against any young women choosing to testify
against Jeffs.

Time to get back to the beginning of my DX vacation!

Mike

- - MWB,
- - How can all those 'enlightened' Progressives who
- - are for Gay Marriage an the Rights of Individuals
- - be so opposed to Polygamy and the Rights of
- - Individuals to any and all forms of Marriage ?
- -
- - one wonders . . . ~ RHF

- Good question.
- Obviously, communis ... er, I mean "progressives",
- would be all for polygamy if the practitioners were gay.

:-)))) ~ RHF

Freedom for One Must Be Freedom for All
-otherwise- it is just 'Privilege' for the Select Few

-after-all- Perfect Liberty -is- Perfect Liberty

Real Individual Rights by their very nature
can have No Collective Limits {Restrictions}

On Jun 12, 5:16*am, dave wrote:
- - RHF wrote:
- - Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church
- - of LDS and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
- - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...esus_Christ_of....

- The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes.
-*Hell, look at the Roman Cathlicks.

-proof- Just the mention of "Church" and
Dave's Bigotry starts oozing out . . .

On Jun 12, 5:14*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

f_Latter_Day_Saints

* .
* note ? Would LDS Members {Peers} be
allowed to be 'members' of the Jury ?
* .

- Lunatics are not entitled to a jury
- of their peers as lunatics.

Dave,

So you are now the Judge and Jury of
Who-Is-Sane and who-is-insane

Based upon your views {bias and bigotry}
about their Religious Teachings and Values;
including their Religious Base Family
Centered Life Style.

everyone please rise 'dave' has
entered the courtroom ~ RHF