"m II" wrote in message ...

The remainder of the Abrahamic community takes offense at their exclusion.

Should they hire Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell as a public relations
director?

Falwell is already writhing in the fires...

On Jun 12, 4:15*am, Radiomatt wrote:
Krypsis wrote:
On 12/06/2010 8:12 AM, Gregg wrote:
On Jun 11, 6:09 pm, *wrote:
On Jun 11, 3:06 pm, *wrote:

On Jun 11, 11:11 am, *wrote:

On Jun 11, 3:17 am, *wrote:

On Jun 11, 3:57 am, *wrote:

Mike "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

On Jun 10, 6:00 pm, *wrote:
On Jun 10, 2:38 pm, *wrote:

On Jun 10, 5:25 pm, *wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:18 pm, *wrote:

I can't say I am surprised. Both of the two girls decided
not to
testify and the prosecution said "it just wouldn't be worth
it" not
verbatim - but something like that. Pretty powerful guy IMO
to duck
those charges.

What do you think BA? Do you think there was a chance a
sweaty palm
full of money was exchanged?

???

Do you know what I'm talking about Bruce? The LDS leader, or
one of
them like BA said.

Oh, THAT guy.

Another screwball IMHO. *Who is BA?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce,

BA is BrendaAnn, a long-time group member. She's a pretty straight
shooter and I believe she had some encounters with the LDS
earlier in
her life.

Mark this day on your calendar. I think Gregg and I agree that AZ
dismissal of charges against Jeffs seems fishy. But he still has to
deal with charges of child sexual abuse in TX. The FLDS can be
incredibly intimidating against any young women choosing to testify
against Jeffs.

Time to get back to the beginning of my DX vacation!

Your time would probably be better spent trying to obtain that
PhD that you'd
previously lied about having.

dxAce
Michigan
USA- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

See, already broke his promise...lol. I guess in his twisted psyche,
if it's a "suck up" post it doesn't count. Now watch him try his ole'
twist and turn and shuck and jive. See, when he "plays" nice, it's
all
good in his mind. "Boggles the mind" per the Prosecuting Attorney
towards MB in Utah. Scream into that tape recorder all debate
style...what a hoot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kind of an overreaction to a pretty innocuous comment...- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce, you haven't had to deal with him like I have. That is how he
starts....lol. You haven't had him attacking just about everything you
post or say - be it to someone else or that is none of his business.
You got a little perturbed with his "Duh" comment to you. That's OK
though. I asked him to leave me alone / not mention me etc. etc. etc..
- like I said - I couldn't be any plainer. Anyone else would have
understood it except for maybe three others in here (not including you
into the fray however).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

YOU have the power Gregg. *All you have to do is let it be.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I did.

Gregg, when will you learn that YOU are the problem?

Even Bruce can see that now!

I guess you'll be calling the trolls back any time now to deal with Mike??

Krypsis

It seem obvious to all that Gregg can NOT learn. He has repeteded this
same line over and over, playing the 'I'm a victim, pity me' role while
at the very same time attacking different people left and right. Can you
say 'hypocrite?'

He has opened a can of worms by inviting his troll friends into this
newsgroup and it will never be the same. I've been posting for a lot of
years, then stopped posting but continued reading for many more years,
and now, because of this Gregg character, I fear the newsgroup is headed
for oblivion. Thanks a lot, Gregg. From all of us.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What line did I "repeteded"? Can you say "stupid"? Oh quit the
freeking drama, "Ohhhhhh sniff sniff this group will never be the
same." Freeking grow up. Can you say "hypocrite"?

And then of course followed by the ole' "trusty classic, but always
expected- to show I am a valuable member of the group and people care
what I think" post......yep yep here it is "I've been posting for a
lot of years, then stopped posting but continued reading for many more
years,
and now, because of this Gregg character, I fear the newsgroup is
headed
for oblivion." Bwahahaha - cry me a river, did you take drama classes
also? rolling my eyes Get a grip on yourself, it'll be OK with my
hand on your shoulder Now please (and I will be waiting for it) show
me all these people I have been attacking "left and right" and you so
eloquently stated.

Now, I'll be waiting, MKay?

On Jun 11, 11:43*pm, RHF wrote:
On Jun 10, 2:42*pm, Gregg wrote:





On Jun 10, 5:25*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:18*pm, Gregg wrote:

I can't say I am surprised. Both of the two girls decided not to
testify and the prosecution said "it just wouldn't be worth it" not
verbatim - but something like that. Pretty powerful guy IMO to duck
those charges.

What do you think BA? Do you think there was a chance a sweaty palm
full of money was exchanged?

???

The Texas case against polygamous church sect prophet Warren Jeffs
suddenly looms *even larger than it did before after Arizona officials
decided to dismiss their charges Wednesday, according to a recent
article in the Wichita Falls Times and Record News newspaper.

Jeffs has been awaiting trial in a Mohave County, Arizona jail since
February 2008 for alleged crimes which occurred in that jurisdiction.

Jeffs, as the former leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter Day Saints(FLDS) is obviously the "big fish" among
all the defendants charged in the polygamous sect trials.

The Texas investigations were launched by Wichita Falls native Gregory
Abbott, who is currently the Attorney General for the State of Texas.

Abbott's AG personnel along with many Department of Public Safety
troopers, including several from the Wichita Falls office, raided the
FLDS compound at the YFZ Ranch, near San Angelo, Texas.

With the dismissal of the Arizona charges, prosecution of the group's
leader will be dependent on the Texas Attorney General's office and
other Texas prosecutors.

Two previous FLDS sect members were convicted by Texas juries and
sentenced to heavy prison time for their role in *the activities
behind the walls of secrecy which surrounded the mysterious YFZ Ranch.
Merrill Leroy Jessop was recently convicted and sentenced to 75 years
in the Texas penitentiary by a jury near San Angelo, Texas, for crimes
committed at the YFZ Ranch, also as a result of the work by Gregory
Abbott's office.

The trial of yet another FLDS cult member Abram Harker Jeffs, 39,
commenced Wednesday morning with jury selection in Schleicher County,
Texas. *Abram Harker Jeffs is charged with sexual assault of a child,
a first degree felony which is punishable by five to 99 years orlife
in prison and up to a $10,000 fine.

He was arrested in the raid on the compound near San Angelo, which was
orchestrated by Texas Attorney General Gregory Abbott.

Many Child Protective Services workers from Wichita Falls, Texas,
trekked westward to the YFZ compound at the time of the raid and took
custody of children suspected of being abused.

Wichita Falls attorney Dick Sutherland generously donated his time to
represent one of the children who was in the compound at the time of
the dramatic raid which dominated national headlines.

Anyone interested in reading other public safety and law enforcement
articles should click on the subscribe button above.

http://www.examiner.com/x-33602-Wich...cement-Examine...

Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church of LDS
and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...esus_Christ_of...
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually RHF, I was just going by the two different girls that escaped
under the cloak of darkness along with the three other boys that was
on Dr. Phil some years back. I think they call boys that flee "The
Lost Boys" err something like that.

The girls sure didn't seem to be lying. One of the former "boys" took
the crew into one of the many compounds and show the viewers (being
me) the hidden rooms behind the walls with nothing in it except a bed
on the floor to "seal the deal" so too speak.

From what I have read, he/his group is an extreme branch of the LDS.
Brenda Ann pointed that out long ago. I'm sure if the evidence isn't
there and no one is going to testify or recants, he will walk. I'm
sure LDS members don't do what Jeffs was accused of.

On Jun 12, 11:41*am, DEFCON 88 wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:35*pm, RHF wrote:





On Jun 10, 4:15*pm, Mike wrote:

On Jun 10, 6:00*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:38*pm, Gregg wrote:

On Jun 10, 5:25*pm, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jun 10, 2:18*pm, Gregg wrote:

I can't say I am surprised. Both of the two girls decided not to
testify and the prosecution said "it just wouldn't be worth it" not
verbatim - but something like that. Pretty powerful guy IMO to duck
those charges.

What do you think BA? Do you think there was a chance a sweaty palm
full of money was exchanged?

???

Do you know what I'm talking about Bruce? The LDS leader, or one of
them like BA said.

Oh, THAT guy.

Another screwball IMHO. *Who is BA?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bruce,

BA is BrendaAnn, a long-time group member. She's a pretty straight
shooter and I believe she had some encounters with the LDS earlier in
her life.

Mark this day on your calendar. I think Gregg and I agree that AZ
dismissal of charges against Jeffs seems fishy. But he still has to
deal with charges of child sexual abuse in TX. The FLDS can be
incredibly intimidating against any young women choosing to testify
against Jeffs.

Time to get back to the beginning of my DX vacation!

Mike

MWB,

How can all those 'enlightened' Progressives who
are for Gay Marriage an the Rights of Individuals
be so opposed to Polygamy and the Rights of
Individuals to any and all forms of Marriage ?

one wonders . . . ~ RHF
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good question. Obviously, communis ... er, I mean "progressives",
would be all for polygamy if the practitioners were gay.

Frankly, there's no particular problem I have with polygamy among
consenting adults, although it is not my cup o'tea. With underage
girls - a whole 'nother story.

As far as the Islamic thing goes - same deal. Consenting adults can do
what they wish. Women and girls forced to go along with the male-
dominated polygamist ideology - Nope. No support here.

That from a progressive. I suspect most progressives will feel the
same way. You guys can postulate all you like, but that's how it
shakes out.

Bruce Jensen

On Jun 12, 2:10*pm, RHF wrote:
On Jun 12, 5:16*am, dave wrote:- - RHF wrote:

- - Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church
- - of LDS and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
- -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of....

- The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes.
-*Hell, look at the Roman Cathlicks.

-proof- Just the mention of "Church" and
Dave's Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
*.

Spoken like a true demagoguic shill.

Not hard to find plenty of instances of evil in any Church from any
period. Nothing bigoted about condemning priests for accosting young
boys.

RHF wrote:
On Jun 12, 5:16 am, wrote:
- - RHF wrote:
- - Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church
- - of LDS and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
- - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...esus_Christ_of...

- The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes.
- Hell, look at the Roman Cathlicks.

-proof- Just the mention of "Church" and
Dave's Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
.
No bigotry involved. Plain old fashioned culture war. Sometimes I feel
trapped in a Steve Reeves gladiator movie from the '50s. They spoke
often of the gods.

On Jun 12, 6:09*pm, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On Jun 12, 2:10 pm, *wrote:
On Jun 12, 5:16 am, *wrote:- - RHF wrote:

- - Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church
- - of LDS and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
- -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of...

- The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes.
- Hell, look at the Roman Cathlicks.

-proof- Just the mention of "Church" and
Dave's Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
* .

Spoken like a true demagoguic shill.

Not hard to find plenty of instances of evil in any Church from any
period. *Nothing bigoted about condemning priests for accosting young
boys.

Jeffs didn't accost young boys; he chased them away. *He accosted little
girls.

Um - OK. I was referring to your comment about the "Cathlicks."

RHF wrote:


Oh Dave you have already Judged him Guilty
and Sentenced him to Die.

dave - you are a mental mob of one ~ RHF
.

He's a perv hiding behind a particularly creative interpretation of text.

Religion is bogus and it gets in the way. If we don't hop-to soon we're
dunfer.

bpnjensen wrote:
On Jun 12, 2:10 pm, wrote:
On Jun 12, 5:16 am, wrote:- - RHF wrote:

- - Just the mention of the Fundamentalist Church
- - of LDS and the Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
- -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of...

- The bigger a church is, the more Satanic it becomes.
- Hell, look at the Roman Cathlicks.

-proof- Just the mention of "Church" and
Dave's Bigotry starts oozing out . . .
.

Spoken like a true demagoguic shill.

Not hard to find plenty of instances of evil in any Church from any
period. Nothing bigoted about condemning priests for accosting young
boys.

Jeffs didn't accost young boys; he chased them away. He accosted little
girls.

Brenda Ann wrote:

Falwell is already writhing in the fires...


I'd better clean up my act. I don't feel like meeting him.



mike