Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 07:22 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,027
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On Feb 1, 8:58*am, RHF wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:55*am, bpnjensen wrote:

Well, put up a new inverted-L antenna - 30 feet up a tree, 60 feet
across horz and over the house rooftop (nowhere else to go!), base ~20
feet from house. *Using a winradio 9:1 unun matcher at the base, *not
yet grounded*. *In fact, so far none of the RF chain on this antenna
is grounded. *So far, so good - noise level *fairly* low (lower on
almots all freqs than my DX-Ultra), AND signal strength on most bands
roughly the same, varying depending on the band. *One good thing I do
notice is that on strong MW stations, he antenna does *NOT* reveal a
60 Hz background hum like the DX-Ultra does - I consider this a good
sign. *The far end is about 25 feet from the higher-tension power
lines out back, and the near end is about 15 feet from the low-tension
lines in front. *Next steps -


- 1 - Ground the 9:1 unun

- 2 - Bury the coax from house to base of antenna
- (about 18 feet underground)

You can use 1/2" Polyethylene Tubing to Buryhttp://www.dripdepot.com/1045
your Coax in if you don't want to use PVC Pipe.
*.
Seal the Tubing ends with one of these.http://www.touch-n-foam.com/products.php
*.
- 3 - Install RF isolator (Either Radioworks or
- Wellbrook AFI5030) at the house with or
- without a ground stake connection,

Usually you should try and get this Ground Rod
were the Coax is coming out of the Ground; and
as close as you can get it to were the Coax is
about to enter the House.
*.
- depending on what works the best.
-
- Have not had great reception so far this week,
- so no chance to really give it a workout.

Then things can only get better.

- Further reports to come.
-*Thanks, guys, for all the input so far!

Post It When You Hear Them ) ~ RHF
*.
*.


Good idea on the tubing. Since I already have the PL-259s on the
cable, I may go for 3/4" or 7/8" ID tubing (they should snug through
that size tube, IIRC). I already have the 8' ground stake in at the
edge of the foundation, so it's practically plug and play if I ground
that RF isolator. I was thinking of using CoaxSeal for the tube ends,
since I have a mess of it.

Question - does the additional Poly tube around the coax diminish the
capacity to provide (presumably useful) inductive ground for the
buried cable? If the coax is not "entubed", does the covering break
down in soil? I have RG8X for the run...PVC coating IIRC.

Bruce
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 07:41 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,053
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On 11-02-01 11:22 AM, bpnjensen wrote:

Question - does the additional Poly tube around the coax diminish the
capacity to provide (presumably useful) inductive ground for the
buried cable?



Seems to me that anything resembling an inductive ground would be a bad
thing. The inductive coupling effect would vary completely with the
frequency of the signal, proximity, length, etc. Not good.

Don't settle for anything less than a real, lowest possible impedance,
honest to G_d, mechanically connected ground. I usually smear the wire
connection and electrode with vaseline after having sandpapered them.
Then do your clamping. A plastic cup inverted over the end of the ground
rod will keep the rain out of the joint.


mike
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 07:53 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 665
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On 2/1/11 12:41 , m II wrote:
On 11-02-01 11:22 AM, bpnjensen wrote:

Question - does the additional Poly tube around the coax diminish the
capacity to provide (presumably useful) inductive ground for the
buried cable?



Seems to me that anything resembling an inductive ground would be a bad
thing. The inductive coupling effect would vary completely with the
frequency of the signal, proximity, length, etc. Not good.

Don't settle for anything less than a real, lowest possible impedance,
honest to G_d, mechanically connected ground. I usually smear the wire
connection and electrode with vaseline after having sandpapered them.
Then do your clamping. A plastic cup inverted over the end of the ground
rod will keep the rain out of the joint.


mike


Or you can wrap it with CoaxSeal. Teflon tape works very well,
for this, too.


  #4   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 09:38 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,027
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On Feb 1, 10:41*am, m II wrote:
On 11-02-01 11:22 AM, bpnjensen wrote:

Question - does the additional Poly tube around the coax diminish the
capacity to provide (presumably useful) inductive ground for the
buried cable?


Seems to me that anything resembling an inductive ground would be a bad
thing. The inductive coupling effect would vary completely with the
frequency of the signal, proximity, length, etc. Not good.

Don't settle for anything less than a real, lowest possible impedance,
honest to G_d, mechanically connected ground. I usually smear the wire
connection and electrode with vaseline after having sandpapered them.
Then do your clamping. A plastic cup inverted over the end of the ground
rod will keep the rain out of the joint.

mike


Well, that's not quite what I meant - I am sorry if I was unclear.

IIRC, there is nothing at all wrong with burying a cable, and in fact
it helps to keep the RFI away from the run, as well as keeping the
outer braid near the earthen ground and helping to bleed away currents
travelling along the braid. That is what I was asking about - whether
a poly tube would lessen this desirable effect.

I have every intention of grounding the 9:1 unun, presuming it will
enhance performance (if it does not, I'll disconnect it). If
necessary, I'll also install the RF Isolator and try it both grounded
and ungrounded.

I had never heard that it was necessary to keep a solid mechanical
ground water-free, although I guess I can see the value. I don't
understand what vaseline does - just protect against corrosion? I
doubt if it would help the electrical connection.
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 11:53 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On 02/01/2011 12:38 PM, bpnjensen wrote:


Well, that's not quite what I meant - I am sorry if I was unclear.

IIRC, there is nothing at all wrong with burying a cable, and in fact
it helps to keep the RFI away from the run, as well as keeping the
outer braid near the earthen ground and helping to bleed away currents
travelling along the braid. That is what I was asking about - whether
a poly tube would lessen this desirable effect.

I have every intention of grounding the 9:1 unun, presuming it will
enhance performance (if it does not, I'll disconnect it). If
necessary, I'll also install the RF Isolator and try it both grounded
and ungrounded.

I had never heard that it was necessary to keep a solid mechanical
ground water-free, although I guess I can see the value. I don't
understand what vaseline does - just protect against corrosion? I
doubt if it would help the electrical connection.

You're not supposed to use braid for grounds.


  #6   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 09:47 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On Feb 1, 10:41*am, m II wrote:
On 11-02-01 11:22 AM, bpnjensen wrote:

Question - does the additional Poly tube around the coax diminish the
capacity to provide (presumably useful) inductive ground for the
buried cable?


Seems to me that anything resembling an inductive ground would be a bad
thing. The inductive coupling effect would vary completely with the
frequency of the signal, proximity, length, etc. Not good.

- Don't settle for anything less than a real,
- lowest possible impedance, honest to G_d,
- mechanically connected ground.
- I usually smear the wire connection and
- electrode with vaseline after having sandpapered them.
- Then do your clamping.
- A plastic cup inverted over the end of the
- ground rod will keep the rain out of the joint.
-
- mike

Conductive Grease "NO-OX-ID"
http://www.sanchem.com/aSpecialE.htm...FRiAgwodThlG2g

CRC® Dielectric Grease
http://www.acehardware.com/product/i...ductId=1443552
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 1st 11, 11:55 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default New random Wire antenna in progress

On 02/01/2011 12:47 PM, RHF wrote:
On Feb 1, 10:41 am, m wrote:
On 11-02-01 11:22 AM, bpnjensen wrote:

Question - does the additional Poly tube around the coax diminish the
capacity to provide (presumably useful) inductive ground for the
buried cable?


Seems to me that anything resembling an inductive ground would be a bad
thing. The inductive coupling effect would vary completely with the
frequency of the signal, proximity, length, etc. Not good.

- Don't settle for anything less than a real,
- lowest possible impedance, honest to G_d,
- mechanically connected ground.
- I usually smear the wire connection and
- electrode with vaseline after having sandpapered them.
- Then do your clamping.
- A plastic cup inverted over the end of the
- ground rod will keep the rain out of the joint.
-
- mike

Conductive Grease "NO-OX-ID"
http://www.sanchem.com/aSpecialE.htm...FRiAgwodThlG2g

CRC® Dielectric Grease
http://www.acehardware.com/product/i...ductId=1443552
.
Heat Sink Compound {Zink Oxide}
http://www.radioshack.com/product/in...ductId=2102858
* Rite Aid Zinc Oxide, Ointment
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00009M8JK


even remembering using fluoride toothpaste
hey - what works... works ! - iane ~ RHF
.
.

You are freaking nuts.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? RHF Shortwave 20 December 31st 05 10:41 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 28th 05 06:24 AM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 3 December 27th 05 10:59 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 10:18 PM
random wire antenna Fred Antenna 17 November 22nd 04 07:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017