Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 5 May 2011 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by harry k : On May 5, 5:01*am, Iarnrod wrote: On May 2, 8:27*pm, John Smith wrote: http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-...nclick_check=1 Regards, JS BWAHAHAHAAHAAAHAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAAAA!!! You really got your kook on today, Johnny!! I wonder how they got that appeal up to the 9th circuit so fast. The same way a turd is passed along quickly, and for much the same reason. Of course they did pick the proper court for it, the 9th circuit is known for its outlandish rulings. If you can't win there, you are really lame. Yep. Isn't the 9th (in)famous for having the most rulings overturned by the Supremes of any circuit? -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
9th Circuit hears arguments in Obama birth lawsuit | Shortwave | |||
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate! | Shortwave | |||
Now we know why there is no Certificate of Live Birth for Obama | Shortwave | |||
Now we know why there is no Certificate of Live Birth for Obama | Shortwave | |||
Now we know why there is no Certificate of Live Birth for Obama | Shortwave |