On 6/4/2011 1:44 AM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/3/2011 9:11 PM, John Smith wrote:


And, ether becomes of primary importance, or is paramount to
discussions
on the subject ... let's just not develop a mental illness where we
want
to prevent all others from ignoring-it/discussing-it ...


From discussing WHAT? Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated
EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?





How fitting, it all began with your personal opinions, then filling in
with personal attacks and tomfoolery, now back to personal opinion ...
full circle.


My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On 6/4/2011 4:54 AM, John Smith wrote:



My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/4/2011 2:10 AM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/4/2011 4:54 AM, John Smith wrote:



My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?


Yeah, that is about right, Einstein didn't exist either, or was wrong ...

ROFLOL!!!

.... tomfoolery ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On 6/4/2011 10:07 AM, John Smith wrote:




My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?


Yeah, that is about right, Einstein didn't exist either, or was wrong ...


How does that statement address my question?









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/4/2011 1:05 PM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/4/2011 10:07 AM, John Smith wrote:




My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?


Yeah, that is about right, Einstein didn't exist either, or was wrong ...


How does that statement address my question?


Because Einstein acknowledges his theory must have the platform of
gravitational ether to stand upon? You mean that reason? You mean you
missed that?

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry