On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth wrote:

On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :









On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless

So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.



No Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”, you missed the
message completely!

The message was... you were asked a question. Sane people, when asked a
question, respond with an answer, not an assertion.

Please try again.

We now know what FUD is.

What is ZNR (I seem to remember it's something about Zionists and Nazis)?

Who is William Mook?

And why should anyone care?

Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman