![]() |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
In article ,
John Smith wrote: In California, you can walk into any Best Buy, Fry's, etc. and ask them how many PC's and motherboards they sell a day ... then stop by the apple store on your way home and notice the employees look like the maytag repairman (the most loneliest guy in town) unless they having a new "iPhone rip off day." LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL You can, can you? You can ask a major retailer for its sales figures and they'll just give them to you? Would you mind catching that on video for us? And Apple stores are absolutely booming. The one in New York does more dollars per square foot than Tiffany's for goodness sake. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
In article ,
John Smith wrote: On 10/16/2011 9:54 PM, Alan Baker wrote: In , John wrote: On 10/16/2011 1:50 PM, Alan Baker wrote: In , . net wrote: "Alan wrote in message ... In , John wrote: On 10/13/2011 12:05 AM, Alan Baker wrote: In , John wrote: On 10/12/2011 10:47 PM, Alan Baker wrote: In , John wrote: Hey, I am not the one into social standards! I freely admit that a MAC can do anything a PC can do ... the PC can just do it faster, cheaper and usually better ... Really? Better in what way? Give a concrete example... Snap in a high end NVIDIA or ATI card into our PC with a high res HD monitor, sit in next to a MAC ... you will see what I mean ... do the same with audio ... You mean, like this: http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-quadro-4000-mac-us.html And with audio, do you mean like this: http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProFireLightbridge.html Or this: http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Delta1010.html Or perhaps this: http://www.motu.com/products/pciaudio/HD192/specs.html No plug your SDR amateur rig into the USB port of your PC and start using it ... notice that there is no software available for the MAC ... linux is covered with an app, etc., etc., etc. Really? No software at all, huh? http://www.rfspace.com/RFSPACE/CuteSDR.html You keep putting words in my mouth, seems like I said a PC can do it better ... that was the part you choose to dispute, not the faster, cheaper ... or the fact that PC stays current with uptodate software/codecs/drivers/hardware/firmware ... I asked how it did it better and you responded with things that (apparently) you thought you couldn't do with a Mac. Got a comparison to this card for the PC: http://pressroom.nvidia.com/easyir/c...yirid=A0D622CE 9F 5 79F 09 &v ers ion=live&releasejsp=release_157&xhtml=true&prid=73 6275 I don't need one. Good thing too ... as you will have to "not need a lot of things" when running a MAC! Superior video is just one of them ... if you play video games, you can forget the ones which have no MAC version ... Regards, JS LOL And now it comes out: what you want "superior video" for is... ...video games! There are virtually NO applications which are as demanding as video games on a home PC. Since I contract to develop software, and compiler/linker speeds are important to me, it is worth considering and benchmarking ... however, what am I, one out of 10,000 who runs such a demanding commercial app? So, of course video games become the best universal benchmark -- any child can run them, even if the adults can't ... No, actually. Video games are hard on VIDEO performance, John. Almost all of the processing load they create is handled by the GPU... ...a part which plays essentially no useful role in compiling and linking software. However, you are doing the best you can. At this point, your have realized and woken up to reality, and that the MAC is vastly inferior in comparison to even mid range PC's ... when confronted with this reality, and one realizes they have taken a false position, one must switch over to personal attacks on their opposite in the argument ... abandoning any hope of proving their false positions to be correct. The Mac is better for normal people, John. They want a machine that is easy to use and that doesn't have problems. Most people don't want to modify their computers with performance add-ons any more than they want to do the analogous things to their cars. It will also help to lock your mind into denial, and think that no one here will be smart enough to see what is going on, the desperation and desperate tact's you are being forced to take, to believe they will become obfuscated by the false complexities of your diversions ... that they will not notice you switching subjects, points, facts ... etc. You mean like claiming that video card performance is important to compiling? But, I will ... you can make book on that. Regards, JS Your post shows your total lack of knowledge that the GPU processor can be utilized to run/assist in the running of demanding apps ... load up seti software (POINC, actually), a freely available app which has the capabilities and gives a good demonstration of the advantages ... you probably aren't such a bad guy, just an ignorant one who needs some prompting to seek a cure .. Sorry, but you're now deflecting. You claimed that a high-powered GPU was useful for "compiling and linking". Let's see a cite. http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_c...solutions.html Where does that mention "compiling and linking" on an individual personal computer is sped up by a faster GPU? GPU, the supercomputer of the 21st century. http://www.popsci.com/science/articl...getting-gpu-up gr ade -making-it-worlds-fastest-supercomputer-again Gesus ... you don't even have a clue how moronic that question is, do you? ... but you ask it as if you could understand the answer, obviously you could not ... better yet would be a real moronic question like, why is a GPU not a CPU? ... the answer, IT IS and, like heads, two processors are always better than one! roflol Regards, JS You claimed *YOU* needed a faster GPU in order speed up YOUR compiling and linking, John... ...and now you're producing link after link that doesn't support that claim. Actually, I claimed that software can be made aware of the GPU and utilize it to speed up the processing power of ANY application, it can, it has been, and my claims are true. No. That is most certainly NOT what you claimed, shall I quote you? I also claimed I use software which uses these methods, and I gave an example of software which can be obtained, by anyone, to demonstrated the power of "what happens" when those methods are applied. You have engaged in a personal attack and attempt to deceptively create an argument to aid you ... duh! Worse yet, you are betting you will find morons to assist and support your efforts ... and make me appear answerable to you -- go abuse your wife ... obviously she must be a willing subject, I am not, I eat morons like you ... LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
On 10/17/11 11:59 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
. net wrote in : "Lloyd E wrote in message ... On 10/16/11 10:20 PM, Scout wrote: "Lloyd E wrote in message ... On 10/16/11 4:16 PM, Howard Brazee wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:51:55 -0400, "Scout" wrote: Quite a few people make a living supplying people with such systems customized to their specific desires. Most of my computers have been those. But the local stores that made my computers have all closed and not been replaced. True, it's largely moved to mail order since that way you don't have the overhead of a store front, or if you do maintain a store front, it's just to pick up the occasional sale while you're processing the bulk of your business through internet orders. Face to face contact was good at finding out what my needs and wants really were. Having a clone shop by mail order is as personalized as having a big name computer by mail order. I'd have to agree. And honestly, if that mail order clone shop is cheaper on a per configuration basis, than most of the big names, I'd be running away from them. It just isn't all that much cheaper to buy the parts and put them together properly than it is to buy ready made, UNLESS the shop has really cheap labor or doesn't factor that in. No, actually it is cheaper. It doesn't take very long to assemble a computer, and properly done you easily undercut the names by selective buying. Because the names don't get the discounts that arise as the hardware is superseded by newer tech. A computer they've had sitting in the warehouse for a year is not worth nearly as much as it was a year ago, but they've already paid the higher price for the hardware. A local supplier doesn't have this problem because they have a much quicker supply turnover and thus they don't lose the value in hardware at nearly the rate as the big players do. Plus the small supplier can take advantage of price breaks, sales, discounts, and so on, while the brand guys are limited in their ability to change the hardware configuration at the drop of a hat. Having been in the business for many years, I call bull**** on your little story here. The big boys buy in such massive quantities that they can buy current stuff for what the little guy pays for the last cycle of parts. And then have them built in factories with such cheap labor that any US builder can't even come close to matching. Labor far, far less than minimum wage here. In the end, they sell for less than the little guy that values his labor at all. Odd, I've done it and even figuring my labor at $30/hr I could still provide equal hardware at a lower price, or better hardware at the same price and tuned to the customers exact requirements rather than some cookie cutter. Plus I know several people who make a living out of doing this and oddly enough they seem to be making a pretty decent living at it. That depends on the hardware. For example, I'm not in the PC business anymore but on modems, routers, etc.. a person can go to a Best Buy and get one for less than the computer shop owner pays for it. Where the shop owner shines is in custom building. When certain configurations are built to fill a particular niche for a particular customer. At least that is how it was....way back when.... Back when, it was that way. Now most of the little mom and pop shops depend on their service business to make a living as sales at the current profit margins, aren't where it is at. And getting a good salesman is tough when they can't make good commissions. -- Lloyd |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
In article ,
John Smith wrote: On 10/16/2011 1:39 PM, Alan Baker wrote: In , John wrote: On 10/16/2011 8:09 AM, Howard Brazee wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:44:54 -0400, "Scout" wrote: Sorry, they are selling more desktops because of an expanding market, but their share in that expanding market is decreasing. Other arguments in this thread have been claiming a shrinking desktop market. Which arguments are correct? Both. Could you explain how the market for desktop computers can be both expanding and shrinking? Most laptops cannot even handle Secondlife! Cite... Yours, load it up and give it a spin, it is free ... http://secondlife.com/ Sorry, but that's asking me to do the work of proving your claim. Minimum system requirements: http://secondlife.com/support/system-requirements/ Mac OS X requirements: Mac OS X 10.5: check; Mac OS X 10.6.8 actually 1.5GHz Intel processor: check; 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo actually. Graphics card: Radeon9200 or above, or NVidia GeForce 2 or 4. My MacBook Pro: GeForce 8600M GT. That's only about 10 times faster than the GeForce4 series. Client/viewer downloads: http://secondlife.com/support/downloads/ (Mac/Linux versions available here) Once in world, hang out in Sandbox Island, Sandbox Cordova, or Sandbox Goguen -- here you will find serious "griefers" to test your hardware and video to the max ... When you can manage them, take a trip to the weapons testing sandbox ... and when you want to die ... go to Rausch! Be careful, it can become addicting ... because of low system requirements, this is a good entry level "game" for older/aging computer users ... Regards, JS -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
In article ,
John Smith wrote: When you control only about 4-4.5% of the market....a 13% increase in sales doesn't really show up as anything significant. I would suspect the increase is drive by I-Pad sales....not Mac. For all we know the sale of Macintosh computers has dropped off. Actually, no. We know that the Mac computers sales have increased and outgrown the rest of the personal computer market for something like 22 straight quarters. Still being in a miserable condition after achieving your claims is not a real achievement ... others opinions may vary ... mac sucks for industrial/scientific/production uses ... and playing home computer games ... end of story. So a computer specifically designed for *PEOPLE* to use allegedly "sucks" at industrial and production uses, huh? Wow. Quite the revelation. Fact: scientists are a big market for Macs. As for the rest, where people have a reasonable income, Macs sell more than 10% of all the computers out there. Just look around here, the mac does fine for newsgroups ... Does fine in North America, Europe, Australia, etc. too! -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
On 10/16/2011 8:01 PM, Scout wrote:
"Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Scout" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Scout" wrote: "Howard Brazee" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:00:47 -0700, John Smith wrote: Like I say, outside of academia, I just don't see that many MACs I don't see what academia use, I don't see what most companies use. But I do see what people have in coffee houses - and there are lots of Macs there. That's about where you're going to find them since 3/4 of Macs being sold are the laptops. The Mac desktop market keeps shrinking. No, Scout: THE desktop market keeps shrinking. Cite? http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ES_pcww1203.htm http://srl.gatech.edu/Members/ashah/...is_aditya_abhi nav.pdf http://www.inquisitr.com/76157/table...-sales-by-2015 -laptops-will-still-reign/ Sorry, but somehow I don't see little tables (iPad and knockoffs) as being a adequate replacement for desktop and laptop systems. IOW, people are buying these new toys rather than upgrading their perfectly adequate desktop. I suspect this to be merely a phase and as the mobile market is saturated you will find a sudden drop off in sales. However, I will agree that at the moment desktop sales are down, however, looking around I don't see a lot of people trading in their desktop for a laptop, but rather getting a laptop for use in conjunction with their desktop. Like tobacco, alcohol and marijuana (probably coffee too) are referred to as "gateway drugs", let us hope that the tablets and other toys become "gateway computers." Introducing all to the true value of adequate computing machines! Regards, JS |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
On 10/16/2011 8:09 PM, J R wrote:
A Ford will get you anywhere a Rolls Royce/Bentley will, and do it much better too. cuhulin But, web TV won't ... if an apple is like a toy when compared to a powerful PC ... WEB TV is simply a drawing of a toy ... what it is! Regards, JS |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
Lloyd E Parsons wrote in
: On 10/17/11 11:59 AM, RD Sandman wrote: . net wrote in : "Lloyd E wrote in message ... On 10/16/11 10:20 PM, Scout wrote: "Lloyd E wrote in message ... On 10/16/11 4:16 PM, Howard Brazee wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:51:55 -0400, "Scout" wrote: Quite a few people make a living supplying people with such systems customized to their specific desires. Most of my computers have been those. But the local stores that made my computers have all closed and not been replaced. True, it's largely moved to mail order since that way you don't have the overhead of a store front, or if you do maintain a store front, it's just to pick up the occasional sale while you're processing the bulk of your business through internet orders. Face to face contact was good at finding out what my needs and wants really were. Having a clone shop by mail order is as personalized as having a big name computer by mail order. I'd have to agree. And honestly, if that mail order clone shop is cheaper on a per configuration basis, than most of the big names, I'd be running away from them. It just isn't all that much cheaper to buy the parts and put them together properly than it is to buy ready made, UNLESS the shop has really cheap labor or doesn't factor that in. No, actually it is cheaper. It doesn't take very long to assemble a computer, and properly done you easily undercut the names by selective buying. Because the names don't get the discounts that arise as the hardware is superseded by newer tech. A computer they've had sitting in the warehouse for a year is not worth nearly as much as it was a year ago, but they've already paid the higher price for the hardware. A local supplier doesn't have this problem because they have a much quicker supply turnover and thus they don't lose the value in hardware at nearly the rate as the big players do. Plus the small supplier can take advantage of price breaks, sales, discounts, and so on, while the brand guys are limited in their ability to change the hardware configuration at the drop of a hat. Having been in the business for many years, I call bull**** on your little story here. The big boys buy in such massive quantities that they can buy current stuff for what the little guy pays for the last cycle of parts. And then have them built in factories with such cheap labor that any US builder can't even come close to matching. Labor far, far less than minimum wage here. In the end, they sell for less than the little guy that values his labor at all. Odd, I've done it and even figuring my labor at $30/hr I could still provide equal hardware at a lower price, or better hardware at the same price and tuned to the customers exact requirements rather than some cookie cutter. Plus I know several people who make a living out of doing this and oddly enough they seem to be making a pretty decent living at it. That depends on the hardware. For example, I'm not in the PC business anymore but on modems, routers, etc.. a person can go to a Best Buy and get one for less than the computer shop owner pays for it. Where the shop owner shines is in custom building. When certain configurations are built to fill a particular niche for a particular customer. At least that is how it was....way back when.... Back when, it was that way. Now most of the little mom and pop shops depend on their service business to make a living as sales at the current profit margins, aren't where it is at. Yes, it was the same way back when, but that wasn't what was being discussed was it. And getting a good salesman is tough when they can't make good commissions. Most of the ones that I knew didn't have a separate marketing entity. It was owner-do-all with maybe a couple of shop people or someone to go on site. -- Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) Witnessing Republicans and Democrats bickering over the National Debt is like watching two drunks argue over a bar bill on the Titanic..... |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:14:27 -0700, John Smith
wrote: In California, you can walk into any Best Buy, Fry's, etc. and ask them how many PC's and motherboards they sell a day ... then stop by the apple store on your way home and notice the employees look like the maytag repairman (the most loneliest guy in town) unless they having a new "iPhone rip off day." For whatever reason, Apple Stores are the most profitable retail stores per square foot in the country. The ones I've seen have lots of busy employees. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
(OT) Steve Jobs.
WebTV can, and does easily access some newsgroups that people using
computers can not access.Lets see you beat that.I am not saying WebTV is better (oviously it isn't.Consider, WebTV can not get a virus.) than PCs. cuhulin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com