Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote: Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT. Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed media LIES? Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue. The standard is whether or not they're doing it in the context of the campaign, or a personal attack outside the realm of political speech. Further, content of political speech may extend beyond the usual 'community standards' limitation of normal broadcast content. This may include profanity. And, the stations must run even that content, without comment, without edit, or without disclaimer. If you'll recall when Barry Commoner was running for President in 1980, he began a series of spots with an emphatic "Bull****!" That station I was working wanted to protect themselves from public outcry, and were warned that we may not modify, or disclaim the spots under penalty of law, which may include license jeopardy. So, his political foes may say what they wish about Mr Trump, and Mr Trump may do them no harm. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 8:47:43 AM UTC-5, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT. d Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed media LIES? Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue. The standard is whether or not they're doing it in the context of the campaign, or a personal attack outside the realm of political speech. Further, content of political speech may extend beyond the usual 'community standards' limitation of normal broadcast content. This may include profanity. And, the stations must run even that content, without comment, without edit, or without disclaimer. If you'll recall when Barry Commoner was running for President in 1980, he began a series of spots with an emphatic "Bull****!" That station I was working wanted to protect themselves from public outcry, and were warned that we may not modify, or disclaim the spots under penalty of law, which may include license jeopardy. So, his political foes may say what they wish about Mr Trump, and Mr Trump may do them no harm. Tricks and Frauds of U.S. Presidential Elections. yournewswire.com Rothschilds Caught Rigging The US Election ...WAKE UP!, WORLD! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT. Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed media LIES? Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue. Exactly, In short, any such lawsuit would be a LOSER. Whine, whine, cry about the biased media. But without the media, specifically the "reality" show, Trump's chances would be nil. He sobs like a little girl who sense of entitlement has been violated just because the media isn't nice to him 100% of the time. What a brilliant strategy for swaying undecided voters. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 9:36:18 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote: On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT. Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed media LIES? Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue. Exactly, In short, any such lawsuit would be a LOSER. Whine, whine, cry about the biased media. But without the media, specifically the "reality" show, Trump's chances would be nil. He sobs like a little girl who sense of entitlement has been violated just because the media isn't nice to him 100% of the time. What a brilliant strategy for swaying undecided voters. intellihub.com Putin bans rothschilds from Russia. ...Putin is smart. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 2:10:07 PM UTC-5, DhiaDuit wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 9:36:18 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote: D. Peter Maus wrote: On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT. Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed media LIES? Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue. Exactly, In short, any such lawsuit would be a LOSER. Whine, whine, cry about the biased media. But without the media, specifically the "reality" show, Trump's chances would be nil. He sobs like a little girl who sense of entitlement has been violated just because the media isn't nice to him 100% of the time. What a brilliant strategy for swaying undecided voters. intellihub.com Putin bans rothschilds from Russia. ...Putin is smart. rsbn.tv The Biggest Show On Earth! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stunning crime by government authorities, right out in theopen... | Shortwave | |||
Stunning glory hole video | Shortwave | |||
Stunning news heard on BBC!!! | Shortwave | |||
(OT)Stunning news heard on BBC!!! | Shortwave | |||
Stunning Consumer Confidence Fall | Shortwave |