Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sir, if you are so interested in having a magazine dedicated to the free
banding people why don't you start one. With 15 million, seems that you would end up as a financial wizard. The ARRL isn't going to print anything about free banding when they operate on frequencies they are not permitted. "Licensing" is the name of the game. "Legal" operation is the name of the game. Maybe you should go back to printing a "CB" magazine, something like there was back in the 60's-70's. Jose wrote: I don't lilke the ARRL, because QST does not print any articles on Freebanding. Freebanding IS more popular than ham radio, and we represent almost 15 million new potential ARRL members. Too bad the ARRL Yankees can't figure this out. Jose |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL and the local scene | Policy | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy | |||
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) | CB | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | Shortwave |