| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
December 21st 03, 04:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
BBC bias
Those in power at the BBC have forbidden any
references to Saddam Hussein as a "dictator"... Political correctness and anti war bias without a doubt..... http://www.biased-bbc.blogspot.com/ http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003583553,00.html Clint KB5ZHT -- ------ It's as if the diplomatic train has left the station and clueless critics of this country are only now beginning to realize, "Hey, that's my train!" --Neil Cavuto, describing how america's enemies are now suddenly congradulating us and expressing "delight" at the capture of saddam, finally proving we're doing the right thing and that we're succeeding... -------- 45 Communist Goals for America http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm -- |
|
#2
December 21st 03, 02:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clint" and others wrote about the topic above...
Those in power at the BBC have forbidden any references to Saddam Hussein as a "dictator"... Political correctness and anti war bias without a doubt..... http://www.biased-bbc.blogspot.com/ http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003583553,00.html Clint KB5ZHT Someone please help me understand why the BBC would do this. It completely eludes me. What possible reason would they, or anyone, have for sanitzing references to Saddam, or anyone else? I don't get it. |
|
#3
December 21st 03, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sanjaya" wrote in message
nk.net... "Clint" and others wrote about the topic above... Those in power at the BBC have forbidden any references to Saddam Hussein as a "dictator"... Political correctness and anti war bias without a doubt..... http://www.biased-bbc.blogspot.com/ http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003583553,00.html Clint KB5ZHT Someone please help me understand why the BBC would do this. Simple..... just like the english publication called "The Mirror", it's an anti-american outfit that, at every possible oppurtunity, want to derail our efforts and when that's not possible, simply downplay our successes. Clint -- ------ It's as if the diplomatic train has left the station and clueless critics of this country are only now beginning to realize, "Hey, that's my train!" --Neil Cavuto, describing how america's enemies are now suddenly congradulating us and expressing "delight" at the capture of saddam, finally proving we're doing the right thing and that we're succeeding... -------- 45 Communist Goals for America http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm -- |
|
#4
December 21st 03, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sanjaya wrote: "Clint" and others wrote about the topic above... Those in power at the BBC have forbidden any references to Saddam Hussein as a "dictator"... Political correctness and anti war bias without a doubt..... http://www.biased-bbc.blogspot.com/ http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003583553,00.html Clint KB5ZHT Someone please help me understand why the BBC would do this. It completely eludes me. What possible reason would they, or anyone, have for sanitzing references to Saddam, or anyone else? I don't get it. My guess is they're afraid of angering certain terrorist groups which might retaliate against the UK for calling Saddam a dictator. It could just be a defensive maneuver. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#5
December 21st 03, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , HFguy writes
Sanjaya wrote: "Clint" and others wrote about the topic above... Those in power at the BBC have forbidden any references to Saddam Hussein as a "dictator"... Political correctness and anti war bias without a doubt..... http://www.biased-bbc.blogspot.com/ http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003583553,00.html Clint KB5ZHT Someone please help me understand why the BBC would do this. It completely eludes me. What possible reason would they, or anyone, have for sanitzing references to Saddam, or anyone else? I don't get it. My guess is they're afraid of angering certain terrorist groups which might retaliate against the UK for calling Saddam a dictator. It could just be a defensive maneuver. Hardly. He is an ex-dictator now. Mike -- M.J.Powell |
|
#6
December 22nd 03, 12:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"HFguy" wrote in message ...
My guess is they're afraid of angering certain terrorist groups which might retaliate against the UK for calling Saddam a dictator. It could just be a defensive maneuver. interesting way of describing cowardice and gutlessness. Clint -- ------ It's as if the diplomatic train has left the station and clueless critics of this country are only now beginning to realize, "Hey, that's my train!" --Neil Cavuto, describing how america's enemies are now suddenly congradulating us and expressing "delight" at the capture of saddam, finally proving we're doing the right thing and that we're succeeding... -------- 45 Communist Goals for America http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm -- |
|
#7
December 22nd 03, 12:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"m II" wrote in message
... It's hard to be mad at someone who has been called mainly by his first name for years. It's never happened before. "And on the Eastern front, Adolph is stalled. Joseph, on the other hand, continues renovating the gulags. Winston is keeping an eye on things" See? it doesn't work. Napoleon would have found this theory very interesting. Clint ------ It's as if the diplomatic train has left the station and clueless critics of this country are only now beginning to realize, "Hey, that's my train!" --Neil Cavuto, describing how america's enemies are now suddenly congradulating us and expressing "delight" at the capture of saddam, finally proving we're doing the right thing and that we're succeeding... -------- 45 Communist Goals for America http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm -- |
|
#8
December 22nd 03, 01:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clint wrote: Napoleon would have found this theory very interesting. But you're not mad at Napoleon, are you? I'll bet you can't even think of even *ONE* thing he's done to personally upset you. The first name theory WORKS! mike -- __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / / / /\ \/ /\ \/ /\ \/ / /_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ ..let the cat out to reply.. |
|
#9
December 22nd 03, 05:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The BBC has a long history of being "PC" all us Brits know that.
- but to describe us brits as cowardly and gutless is beyond comprehension. interesting way of describing cowardice and gutlessness. Clint You mindless morons have us to thank for covering your war mongering countries ass as almost everyone else in the world hates you, you now start on the only friend you have? That just shows what a "2 bit" bunch of gun crazed clowns you are. If you spent as much time shooting your enemies as you do shooting at out troops the thing may well have been over by now. Mind you could we expect anything else from somone with a silent N in his name? me |
|
#10
December 22nd 03, 06:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hussein is a common last name. Too, although King Hussein of Jordan is dead
now, using Hussein could have caused a mix up with him while he was alive. Bill, K5BY |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| TV7 Bias pot | Boatanchors | |||
| GS35B bias | Homebrew | |||
| GS35B bias | Homebrew | |||
| HV Bias Supply Challenge | Homebrew | |||
Linear Mode
