Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hello... phil? whats the matter Eric? you're usually a bowl of sunshine. overload any radios lately? 73s, phil ![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"phil
![]() Hello... phil? whats the matter Eric? you're usually a bowl of sunshine. overload any radios lately? Heck, no, phil, all the radios I have now can handle strong signals in their front-ends. I see Bob Sherwood relatively frequently at hamfests and keep bugging him to put the R-75 specs into his high-end receiver comparison table. Eventually... (he just laughed when I tried to sell him my R-75!) 73s, phil ![]() -- Eric F. Richards, "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric F. Richards wrote in message . ..
"phil ![]() Hello... phil? . I see Bob Sherwood relatively frequently at hamfests and keep bugging him to put the R-75 specs into his high-end receiver comparison table. Eventually... (he just laughed when I tried to sell him my R-75!) Do you know that the Ten Tec RX340 and R-75 passport laboratory measurements were conducted in your friend Bob Sherwood laboratory? Here Bob RX-340 [$3,999]test findings:The sync selectable sideband lose look relatively easily,Passport recomend an external Sherwood SE-3 [500.00],poor dynamic range,static crashes sound harsher than on analog receivers.Spurious signal noted around 6MHZ segment,notch filter does not work in AM,Sync selectable sideband or ISB modes,Noise blanker not effective ect, ect, ect, Maybe he recalled this RX-340 test when he laughed at you in the hamfest.About his R-75 test:Oustanding rejection of spurious signals,reception of faint signals alongside powerful competing ones , ultimate selectivity and good dynamic range.If you or anyone here keep trying to put down the R-75 with subjetive statements I will react with your own resources. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Kenneth wrote: Eric F. Richards wrote in message . .. "phil ![]() Hello... phil? . I see Bob Sherwood relatively frequently at hamfests and keep bugging him to put the R-75 specs into his high-end receiver comparison table. Eventually... (he just laughed when I tried to sell him my R-75!) Do you know that the Ten Tec RX340 and R-75 passport laboratory measurements were conducted in your friend Bob Sherwood laboratory? Here Bob RX-340 [$3,999]test findings:The sync selectable sideband lose look relatively easily,Passport recomend an external Sherwood SE-3 [500.00],poor dynamic range,static crashes sound harsher than on analog receivers.Spurious signal noted around 6MHZ segment,notch filter does not work in AM,Sync selectable sideband or ISB modes,Noise blanker not effective ect, ect, ect, Maybe he recalled this RX-340 test when he laughed at you in the hamfest.About his R-75 test:Oustanding rejection of spurious signals,reception of faint signals alongside powerful competing ones , ultimate selectivity and good dynamic range.If you or anyone here keep trying to put down the R-75 with subjetive statements I will react with your own resources. I've really got to tell you what blows my mind! It's the fact that you and many others who claim to 'own' an R75 keep writing it up as a 'R-75'. Do you ever get to use the radio and look at the front panel? It's an R75, at least it says so on the front. Or, is the problem that you've always got it apart trying to fix its shortcomings that you never actually get to look at the front of the radio? Wondering... Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N8KDV,
Your are Right ![]() It is the Icom IC-R75 [.] So I Guess I Need to go to the Black Board and Write Icom IC-R75 x 100 [.] Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 there, There. THERE! I Feel All Better Now ![]() A Proud Icom IC-R75 {R-75} Owner - The Icom IC-R75: Its "MY" Radio ! [ Honestly, Forget the Facts and Tecnical Data - Its How I FEEL ! ] jftfoi ~ RHF .. .. = = = N8KDV = = = wrote in message ... Kenneth wrote: Eric F. Richards wrote in message . .. "phil ![]() Hello... phil? . I see Bob Sherwood relatively frequently at hamfests and keep bugging him to put the R-75 specs into his high-end receiver comparison table. Eventually... (he just laughed when I tried to sell him my R-75!) Do you know that the Ten Tec RX340 and R-75 passport laboratory measurements were conducted in your friend Bob Sherwood laboratory? Here Bob RX-340 [$3,999]test findings:The sync selectable sideband lose look relatively easily,Passport recomend an external Sherwood SE-3 [500.00],poor dynamic range,static crashes sound harsher than on analog receivers.Spurious signal noted around 6MHZ segment,notch filter does not work in AM,Sync selectable sideband or ISB modes,Noise blanker not effective ect, ect, ect, Maybe he recalled this RX-340 test when he laughed at you in the hamfest.About his R-75 test:Oustanding rejection of spurious signals,reception of faint signals alongside powerful competing ones , ultimate selectivity and good dynamic range.If you or anyone here keep trying to put down the R-75 with subjetive statements I will react with your own resources. I've really got to tell you what blows my mind! It's the fact that you and many others who claim to 'own' an R75 keep writing it up as a 'R-75'. Do you ever get to use the radio and look at the front panel? It's an R75, at least it says so on the front. Or, is the problem that you've always got it apart trying to fix its shortcomings that you never actually get to look at the front of the radio? Wondering... Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
N8KDV, Your are Right ![]() It is the Icom IC-R75 [.] So I Guess I Need to go to the Black Board and Write Icom IC-R75 x 100 [.] Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 there, There. THERE! I Feel All Better Now ![]() A Proud Icom IC-R75 {R-75} Owner - The Icom IC-R75: Its "MY" Radio ! [ Honestly, Forget the Facts and Tecnical Data - Its How I FEEL ! ] jftfoi ~ RHF I bet you typed all those "Icom IC-R75" lines individually. :-) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HF Guy,
"I bet you typed all those "Icom IC-R75" lines individually. :-)" yes, Yes. YES ! - Using My "Dueling Two Finger Typing" Style ![]() Butt Hay ! - I Own a Icom IC-R75 - Its "MY Radio ! { aka: R-75 = The RAaa Dasha Seventee Fiva } jftfoi ~ RHF .. .. = = = HFguy = = = wrote in message ... RHF wrote: N8KDV, Your are Right ![]() It is the Icom IC-R75 [.] So I Guess I Need to go to the Black Board and Write Icom IC-R75 x 100 [.] Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 Icom IC-R75 there, There. THERE! I Feel All Better Now ![]() A Proud Icom IC-R75 {R-75} Owner - The Icom IC-R75: Its "MY" Radio ! [ Honestly, Forget the Facts and Tecnical Data - Its How I FEEL ! ] jftfoi ~ RHF I bet you typed all those "Icom IC-R75" lines individually. :-) Butt Hay ! - I Own a Icom IC-R75 - Its "MY Radio ! { aka: R-75 = The RAaa Dasha Seventee Fiva } Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 Icom R-75 sorry, Sorry. SORRY ! - I Just Had To Do It ! - "R-75" Forever ! . . .. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
N8KDV wrote: Kenneth wrote: Eric F. Richards wrote in message . .. "phil ![]() Hello... phil? . I see Bob Sherwood relatively frequently at hamfests and keep bugging him to put the R-75 specs into his high-end receiver comparison table. Eventually... (he just laughed when I tried to sell him my R-75!) Do you know that the Ten Tec RX340 and R-75 passport laboratory measurements were conducted in your friend Bob Sherwood laboratory? Here Bob RX-340 [$3,999]test findings:The sync selectable sideband lose look relatively easily,Passport recomend an external Sherwood SE-3 [500.00],poor dynamic range,static crashes sound harsher than on analog receivers.Spurious signal noted around 6MHZ segment,notch filter does not work in AM,Sync selectable sideband or ISB modes,Noise blanker not effective ect, ect, ect, Maybe he recalled this RX-340 test when he laughed at you in the hamfest.About his R-75 test:Oustanding rejection of spurious signals,reception of faint signals alongside powerful competing ones , ultimate selectivity and good dynamic range.If you or anyone here keep trying to put down the R-75 with subjetive statements I will react with your own resources. I've really got to tell you what blows my mind! It's the fact that you and many others who claim to 'own' an R75 keep writing it up as a 'R-75'. Do you ever get to use the radio and look at the front panel? It's an R75, at least it says so on the front. Or, is the problem that you've always got it apart trying to fix its shortcomings that you never actually get to look at the front of the radio? Wondering... Just another IC-R75 " HACK " I mean R-75 modification. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric F. Richards wrote in message
Do you know that the Ten Tec RX340 and R-75 passport laboratory measurements were conducted in your friend Bob Sherwood laboratory? The sync selectable sideband lose look relatively easily, Early firmware fix. Passport in the evaluation of revised model page:A number of issues persist:synchronous selectable sideband doesn't hold lock as well as it should and various feature are limited by mode choice.In read in the ten tec RX- 350 yahoo group that they are still waiting for some of those "firmware fixings" Passport recomend an external Sherwood SE-3 [500.00], For most radios, and for those they don't it's often because the combined cost will put you into another radio's class. poor dynamic range, The 81 dB is killing me. If I mod it I can get 100 dB at 5 kHz. Check the ten tec site page for the RX340 dynamic range and blocking lab numbers static crashes sound harsher than on analog receivers. They do. It's shortwave radio -- shut up and deal. notch filter does not work in AM,Sync selectable sideband or ISB modes,Noise blanker not effective ect, ect, ect, Firmware fix, Kenneth. Maybe you should check what's going on before you wroted anything down. Where I can read about this latest "firmware fixes" to the syn det? Maybe he recalled this RX-340 test when he laughed at you in the hamfest.About his R-75 test:Oustanding rejection of spurious signals,reception of faint signals alongside powerful competing ones , ultimate selectivity and good dynamic range.If you or anyone here keep trying to put down the R-75 with subjetive statements I will react with your own resources. You. Are. An. Idiot. I don't did the test, you are insulting the wrong guy. You go play with your R-75, all features, no basic performance play toy while the rest of us use real radios. I do believe that the front panel of an RX-240 is too complex for you to use, though, so don't bother trying to actually use the features. Yes for me any radio is a toy to play with it,a hobby,something to have fun.Insulting [or trying to insult] people because they don't like your expensive toy is a childish behavior. Do you see what happens when you you try to "put down" others receivers with sarcastic arguments and you have a glass roof? .You get upset and start insulting everyone that don't like your radio.You a suppposed respetable and honorable gentleman are only projecting your repressed desires in your insults.One more point: To insult people is the first sign of a poor argument. If you call someone a loser, or an idiot it indicates that you don't have anything intelligent to say and you are far less likely to attract support than if you concentrate on the discussion topic.People who frequently base their arguments around lines like "get a life" don't tend to be taken too seriously.Relax we are talking only about a radio. With best regards: Ken |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Icom 730 zero-beat question | General | |||
Icom 730 preventative maintenance question | Equipment | |||
Icom 730 preventative maintenance question | Equipment | |||
Newbie question: icom ic-r7000 | Scanner | |||
question ICOM PCR-1000 | Equipment |