Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Digital comms are purely square waves. I'm using the term "square wave" to mean a sharp cornered pulse train with an exactly 50% duty cycle. There's not much information there. You've seen one pulse of the square wave, you've seen them all. The modulation is FSK or similar (generally)... in other words, the on-state is one frequency, the off state is another. This creates a chain of square waves which themselves are not modulated. And the square wave is recovered after only after demodulation of the sine waves. The modulation doesn't necessaraly create harmonics, but it does create sidebands. This guy likes to use triangle waves in his illustrations: http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/S.Bhat...es/node12.html The bandwidth, in this case 75 MHz, is how many on/off states there are in one second. This is also concurrent with bitrate. Compression schemes can raise the apparent bitrate, however the actual bitrate is the same as the frequency used. The carriers can be both amplitude and phase modulated to increase bitrate. Given that the BPL is usually described as a spread spectrum technology, I'll assume there's many carrier frequencies. I'm not sure how they do the band notching that Japan tried before they tossed out the idea completely. Doesn't Japan have a higher percentage of SWLs and radio amateurs than the US? I don't think most Americans will much care about BPL unless it effects the TV. I'll bet the BPL traps at 3.58 MHz work just fine. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC -- a way to jam skywave signals from Mexico and Canada at night, just like the USSR did with VOA, RFE/RL, ... | Broadcasting | |||
The "Radio Crazy" Well-earned demise of AM IBOC. | Broadcasting | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting | |||
Here comes IBOC | Shortwave |