Michael Bryant wrote:

From: (RHF)

SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.]


Sad behavior, RHF.

Since you claim to be a Christian, your behavior is behavior that you must know
you that you will be held accountable for.

I am a married father of a daughter in her twenties. How would you feel if your
children saw these types of claims made against you by people claiming to be
Christian?

I no longer believe your claims of being a Christian, Mr. Fisk. The way you act
and the things you say are not the actions or words of a Christian. Prove you
are a Christian, Mr. Fisk, because your actions suggest otherwise.

And to set the record straight - I am neither a member of NAMBLA or a
homosexual. An "indictment" carries the burden of proof. I am a teacher and my
past actions have been thoroughly investigated. To have such a respected member
of our community act the way you have is particularly reprehensible, Mr. Fisk.
The standards for an indictment on internet slander are different than they are
for internet harassment. I advise you, Mr. Fisk, to look them up.

Why don't you do one of your Google 'Power Searches' for us Bryant and post the
'standards' here.

We'll all be holding our breath!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

In article ,
says...

MWB,

You Stand Accused as 'being' a Member of NAMBLA by AvtCpTRm [.]

North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA)
NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/

No, no, it's the North American MARLON BRANDO Love
Association! Don't you watch South Park?

These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

"mer Seriousness"? Is that like a merman or mermaid?

BUTT

Freudian slip there, dude.

- Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"MWB" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a Member of NAMBLA.

PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB !

"Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"

MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

By who?

Whoop, bad English.

"By WHOM?"

"MWB" - Are You Currently -or- Have You Ever Been a Member of NAMBLA ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

"Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the
Communist Party?"

First - "MWB" have you ever been in a Public Liberary 'alone'
while young Boys are in the building ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

Uh... if he and the boys were in there, he could hardly be
called 'alone'...

Second - "MWB" have you ever been to a Public Park 'alone'
while young "Boys are playing ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

Ditto.

Third - "MWB" have you ever been an Adult Leader for the
Boy Scouts or the Boy's Clubs ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

"Priest" would be a bigger concern, I think.

SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.]

Therefore "MWB" You Stand Convicted as a Member In-Fact of NAMBLA
or a De-Facto Member of NAMBLA.

You're taking this from Hal Turner's webpage, aren't you?

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "MWB"
^^^^^^^^^
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

You misspelled 'Satanist" there. Just thought you should know.

MWB - Lets Us Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of NAMBLA - Amen


palta ~ RHF

You know, if you're going to be sarcastic these days - OR serious,
for that matter - you REALLY need to indicate it, because things
have gotten so wacky it's not always easy to tell the difference.

FW

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

And, what exactly *were* you doing to that kid in that motel
room, besides smoking dope with him...more of that NAMBLA
handshake?

Since there were about 15 people in the room, including the 22-year old "kid's"
girlfriend, I assure you it wasn't whatever you mean by a "NAMBLA handshake,"
though I think we can safely assume that your specific knowledge of such
activities is extensive.

Thanks for the re-print which proved that I was only given a relatively small
fine and that I was not fired. The article does not say that me and other
person charged were the only ones in the room. That's your insinuation.

But that's not what the article says does it?

"On Oct. 6, Bryant and another student were found in a motel room
with marijuana, Bryant, who
was with the team at a tournament, resigned from Weber State
shortly after".

So suddenly all those other individuals whom you 'claim' were in the room were
somehow not there with marijuana but you and Hallmeyer were? And then you two were
charged, but no one else was?

The article(s) specifically state that yourself and another individual were found
in the room. There is never any mention of any other individuals being in the room.

As far as being fired, well indeed you were not, however it is safe to assume that
you felt it best to resign prior to being fired is it not?

One also often forgets the fact that you tried to make a 'deal' with the prosecutor
in the case, so that also may have had some bearing upon your decision to leave
Weber State. After all, your 'friends' might have a bit of a problem hanging around
with someone they might consider to be a 'narc'.

This is very strange Bryant. Keep spinning!

P.S. How am I doing with my sentences today? Better than one line responses?

LOL

MWB,

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF
= = = I Remain... RHF [.]
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: (RHF)


SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.]


Sad behavior, RHF.

Since you claim to be a Christian, your behavior is behavior that you must know
you that you will be held accountable for.

I am a married father of a daughter in her twenties. How would you feel if your
children saw these types of claims made against you by people claiming to be
Christian?

I no longer believe your claims of being a Christian, Mr. Fisk. The way you act
and the things you say are not the actions or words of a Christian. Prove you
are a Christian, Mr. Fisk, because your actions suggest otherwise.

And to set the record straight - I am neither a member of NAMBLA or a
homosexual. An "indictment" carries the burden of proof. I am a teacher and my
past actions have been thoroughly investigated. To have such a respected member
of our community act the way you have is particularly reprehensible, Mr. Fisk.
The standards for an indictment on internet slander are different than they are
for internet harassment. I advise you, Mr. Fisk, to look them up.

This is my last response to you, Roy Fisk. The words (and the character behind
them) do not warrant any further response. I pray for your darkened soul.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: (RHF)

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF

RHF,

So, are you drunk? I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply
whatsoever. There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real
help.

Good luck, RHF. We're all behind you. Way behind....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: (RHF)

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF

RHF,

So, are you drunk?

Accusing everyone of being drunk tonight Fat Boy?

Are you projecting? Are you in fact drunk yourself?

I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply
whatsoever.

Then why did you reply Fat Boy?

There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real
help.

Yes, you do indeed need to get help.

You're still projecting!

Now you just go roll your fat ass on the floor!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

Vietnam Veterans Against Kerry

From: N8KDV

Then why did you reply Fat Boy?


OK, Ace Retardo, use your magic decoder ring and translate Roy's gibberish,
will you?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Then why did you reply Fat Boy?


OK, Ace Retardo, use your magic decoder ring and translate Roy's gibberish,
will you?

You didn't answer the question Fat Boy... why did you respond in the first
place?

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry

From: N8KDV

You didn't answer the question Fat Boy... why did you respond in the first
place?

Easy! To watch you make five more posts!

Your questions, to be honest, are so lame that they really don't deserve
responses.

Kerry Supporters Against Rude, Stupid Veterans,


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

= = = (Frank White) wrote in message
= = = ...

In article ,
says...

MWB,

You Stand Accused as 'being' a Member of NAMBLA by AvtCpTRm [.]

North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA)
NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/

No, no, it's the North American MARLON BRANDO Love
Association! Don't you watch South Park?

These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

"mer Seriousness"? Is that like a merman or mermaid?

FW - Ah Yes - That was a MERE Omission of an 'e'.


BUTT

Freudian slip there, dude.


FW - So you think that Freud liked to wear Slips )

NO, I say let my 'buts' be BUTs
.... and My BUTTs be Boot-i-ful )

- Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"MWB" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a Member of NAMBLA.

PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB !

"Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"

FW - So you See It )


MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

By who?

FW - By All That Call Everyone - To Account )

Whoop, bad English.

"By WHOM?"

"MWB" - Are You Currently -or- Have You Ever Been a Member of NAMBLA ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

"Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the
Communist Party?"

FW - yes, Yes. YES ! - You See It )


First - "MWB" have you ever been in a Public Liberary 'alone'
while young Boys are in the building ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

Uh... if he and the boys were in there, he could hardly be
called 'alone'...


FW - Starting to sound like Bill Clinton
? What is the Definition of Alone ?
? What Does "IS" Mean ?

Second - "MWB" have you ever been to a Public Park 'alone'
while young "Boys are playing ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

Ditto.

FW - ditto, Ditto. DITTO ! (Hell - Mega Dittos )


Third - "MWB" have you ever been an Adult Leader for the
Boy Scouts or the Boy's Clubs ?
+ Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB

"Priest" would be a bigger concern, I think.

FW - Actually other then family, Public School Teachers are the
single group with the Highest Percentage and Highest Number of
Child Molesters and Pedophiles. NOT because they as a group
are bad; but simply because they have the highest number of
interactions between Adults and Teenage Children.


SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.]

Therefore "MWB" You Stand Convicted as a Member In-Fact of NAMBLA
or a De-Facto Member of NAMBLA.

You're taking this from Hal Turner's webpage, aren't you?

FW - No this is all simple Liberal Logical Rhetoric for
'falsely issuing' a SERIOUS Charge and then Claiming that
the "Serious of the Charge" Requires an Investigation.
- Regardless of the Truthfulness of the Charges.
= Damnation By Inference ;-{


My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "MWB"
^^^^^^^^^
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

You misspelled 'Satanist" there. Just thought you should know.

FW - Obviously your point of reference is different then mine ;-)


MWB - Lets Us Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of NAMBLA - Amen


palta ~ RHF

You know, if you're going to be sarcastic these days - OR serious,
for that matter - you REALLY need to indicate it, because things
have gotten so wacky it's not always easy to tell the difference.

FW

FW - Forgive Me - I Never Claimed to be a Communications Major )

wmcis ~ RHF

..