Steve,

Earlier today, when I was at work, you posted all kinds of rants chiding me for
not producing proof that you ever said you were involved in any search for Pol
Pot. I guess you have a lot of time to waste, since you don't work. But now
that I've posted the proof you seem to be conveniently missing.

Wazzup, DX Ace? Don't worry, your R8B knows you don't lie....




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Dinner wasn't very good.

My UPS went out today here at the office. I have 25 of these models out
in the field, I sure hope they don't start going down or I have a lot of
them to replace.

So who's Pol Pot, some North Korean ????

Michael Bryant wrote:
Steve,

Earlier today, when I was at work, you posted all kinds of rants chiding me for
not producing proof that you ever said you were involved in any search for Pol
Pot. I guess you have a lot of time to waste, since you don't work. But now
that I've posted the proof you seem to be conveniently missing.

Wazzup, DX Ace? Don't worry, your R8B knows you don't lie....




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Pol Pot was the driving force behind the Khmer Rouge and their
genocidal actions in Cambodia in the 70's. His rise to power was
pretty much coincidental with the US leaving Viet Nam.

Wait a minute ......... did I just get suckered by you Burr? Surely
you remember, at least in 'outline fashion' what the story was.


On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 04:18:40 GMT, Burr wrote:

Dinner wasn't very good.

My UPS went out today here at the office. I have 25 of these models out
in the field, I sure hope they don't start going down or I have a lot of
them to replace.

So who's Pol Pot, some North Korean ????

Michael Bryant wrote:
Steve,

Earlier today, when I was at work, you posted all kinds of rants chiding me for
not producing proof that you ever said you were involved in any search for Pol
Pot. I guess you have a lot of time to waste, since you don't work. But now
that I've posted the proof you seem to be conveniently missing.

Wazzup, DX Ace? Don't worry, your R8B knows you don't lie....




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Howard wrote:
Pol Pot was the driving force behind the Khmer Rouge and their
genocidal actions in Cambodia in the 70's. His rise to power was
pretty much coincidental with the US leaving Viet Nam.

Moreover, following the ouster of Pol Pot by the Vietnamese
in December 1978, Pol Pot's forces found a safe haven in
Thailand, a U.S. client state, and for the next 15 years or
more were aided and protected there by Thai, Chinese,
British, and U.S. authorities.

The U.S. backed Pol Pot's retention of Cambodia's seat in
the UN after his ouster. This support was designed to hurt
Vietnam, which had occupied Cambodia and installed friendly
Hun Sen government in place of Pol Pot. When Vietnam sought
a settlement in the late 1980s, the U.S. insisted
strenuously that Pol Pot be included in the "peace process"
with "the same rights, freedoms and opportunities" as any
other party. In anticipation of a settlement, in the early
l990s the U.S. and its allies not only protected Pol Pot's
forces from defeat by the Cambodian army, they helped him
rebuild his strength and standing. During this
period, the U.S. (and UN) refused to allow the Pol Pot
regime to be referred to as genocidal. In order to oust the
Vietnam-supported government, the U.S. strove to preserve
Pol Pot and make him a significant force in the political
struggle in Cambodia.

--
M2

Michael Bryant wrote:

Steve,

Earlier today, when I was at work, you posted all kinds of rants chiding me for
not producing proof that you ever said you were involved in any search for Pol
Pot.

I never stated that. Learn to read and comprehend!

I guess you have a lot of time to waste, since you don't work. But now
that I've posted the proof you seem to be conveniently missing.

Proof? What proof? You are delusional.

From: N8KDV

Proof? What proof? You are delusional.

Your lies are louder than your insults, Steve. I think we can now see what type
of person you are, liar.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Proof? What proof? You are delusional.

Your lies are louder than your insults, Steve. I think we can now see what type
of person you are, liar.

Where is the lie Bryant? You indicated I was 'listening to Pol Pot'. I denied that.

You indicated I was 'monitoring Pol Pot'. I denied that.

I never denied 'looking for Pol Pot'.

Get your sorry story straight fat boy.



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: N8KDV

Where is the lie Bryant? You indicated I was 'listening to Pol Pot'. I denied
that.

You indicated I was 'monitoring Pol Pot'. I denied that.

I never denied 'looking for Pol Pot'.

Which says enough. You don't lie. Your words lie for you.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Where is the lie Bryant? You indicated I was 'listening to Pol Pot'. I denied
that.

You indicated I was 'monitoring Pol Pot'. I denied that.

I never denied 'looking for Pol Pot'.

Which says enough. You don't lie. Your words lie for you.

No, I was simply responding to what you'd posted.

The only lies were in what YOU posted. And I responded to those lies.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Gotcha!

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Where is the lie Bryant? You indicated I was 'listening to Pol Pot'. I denied
that.

You indicated I was 'monitoring Pol Pot'. I denied that.

I never denied 'looking for Pol Pot'.

Which says enough. You don't lie. Your words lie for you.

Now that is real projection.