![]() |
"CW" wrote in message ...
No, you both missed. An Atheist is one who does not believe in gods. No, YOU missed, CW, as did RHF. You were right up until the following point: "Anyone that believes in a god, no matter what the name of that god, is not an Atheist." I checked all eight of my dictionaries, consulted thesauri and books on word origins in English, and no mention was made of that last sentence. Not *one* of them mentioned anything along the lines of "Anyone that (sic) believes in a god, no matter what the name of that god (sic), is not an Atheist." If you can back up that statement with FACT, I'll bite. If not, your pseudologic is far too fishy for me. Please cite sources. 73, Steve Lawrence Burnsville, MN |
\A"the*ist\, n. [Gr. ? without god; 'a priv. + ? god: cf. F. ath['e]iste.]
1. One who disbelieves or denies the existence of a God, or supreme intelligent Being. "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" spewed crap as usual |
"CW" wrote: | \A"the*ist\, n. [Gr. ? without god; 'a priv. + ? god: cf. F. ath['e]iste.] | 1. One who disbelieves or denies the existence of a God, or supreme | intelligent Being. Fair 'nuff....but are you calling the Gulag - keepers "supreme intelligent Beings?" (grinning) 73, Steve Lawrence Burnsville, MN (Welllll, okay, maybe their masters....) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/04 |
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message om... (RHF) wrote in message . com... CW, "No, you both missed. An Atheist is one who does not believe in gods." Yes - That is True. No, it is not. Re - read what was written: RedOctober90 quoth: " I stay atheist... you never hear about " atheists mass slaughtering people over some "god". My reply merely pointed out that hardcore Marxist-Leninist governments were secular humanist in nature, which is to say that they were, as a part of their official policy, "atheists," and RedOctober90 is, therefore, in precisely the same company from which he was desperately attempting to distance himself, and that these governments, while in fact officially atheistic, managed to "mass slaughter" their best and brightest. Now, don't put words into my mouth, damnit. I was attempting to merely point out that, while RO90 was busy thumping his chest, his brain was gleefully asleep, inasmuch as he could not see the hypocrisy in his words. How could you have missed that one, guys? 73, Steve Lawrence Burnsville, Minnesota I didn't, Steve, but having made my point by agreeing with that post, then seeing the next post completely misunderstand the entire concept, I didn't think it worth my time to reply. I'm glad you did, though. The most fascinating thing I see in "Atheists" is that they have made a faith-based decision at least as profound as those that believe in God. They're saying "I'm absolutely positive that there is no God, my mind is made up." I can understand the "Agnostic" argument much more readily -- "I haven't seen enough evidence to believe in a God." But the atheist's belief that they are absolutely certain that there is not a God is (whether they admit it or not) a faith-based decision. -- Stinger |
"Stinger" wrote | The most fascinating thing I see in "Atheists" is that they have made a | faith-based decision at least as profound as those that believe in God. | They're saying "I'm absolutely positive that there is no God, my mind is | made up." When witnessing the wonders I can find in nature, even in my own backyard, I have to ask myself how anyone can make such a leap of faith. As I pointed out to a relative who claimed to be an Atheist (this was years ago; he's managed to recover of late).... "If you (an unbeliver) are right and I (a beliver) am wrong, you've got nothing to lose by believing." However, if I (a beliver) am right and you (an unbeliever) am wrong, you've got EVERYTHING to lose by not believing." I often think about the Ten Commandments monuments being torn down by unbelievers. If we struck the first one (I the Lord am your God, you will have no other gods before me), *just which one* of those commandments do folks find objectionable? Thou shalt not kill? Thou shalt not covet? I don't believe a monument hurts anyone - not even a monument to Islam, Buddhism, etc. etc. I wake up some mornings and wonder what will become of us as a nation, but I've still got hope. 73, Steve Lawrence Burnsville, MN --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/04 |
= = = Robert Beck wrote in message
= = = . .. Spain is about to prove that a terror attack can get countries to act as you wish. Thanks Spain .. FO&A, A New Domino Theory - by - al-Qaeda http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=3652 Tom Williams has translated an article by Yassin Musharbash that says that in December, 2003, in an Arabic language handbook. jtf ~ RHF .. |
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 04:57:03 GMT, Telamon
wrote: I read and listen to news outlets I don't agree with along with one's I do. Say what? |
"T Breslin" wrote in message ... We should deal with the terrorists. They'll just keep fighting. Let's see what they want. Nothing else has worked. "T Breslin," Don't pick your nose. .. .. .. .. Your head will collapse. -- Stinger |
T Breslin wrote: We should deal with the terrorists. They'll just keep fighting. Let's see what they want. Nothing else has worked. They want you dead. That'll work for them... Tell ya what, you go talk 'pretty' to 'em. Make a will before you go. Have your family let me know when the funeral is. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com