|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "Stinger" Good grief, MWB. You actually let them goad you into posting something that is stupid beyond words. Really. Sorry, but there actually were many republicans supporting Hitler during the 1930's. I think the original statement that Stalin would be a Democratic nominee is also stupid beyong words. I wasn't the one starting the stupid analogies, Stinger. How come you always see it one direction? I didn't. Please note that I also criticized RHF's post that was the mirror image of yours. However, I did note an analogy between the Politburo and liberal elites. No doubt, I'm sure I do tend to see it one direction, though -- guilty as charged, Mike. I think it's just human nature. When I see something presented in an outrageous manner that I really disagree with, it really gets my attention. But when I see something in a similar vein that has at least some reasonable content that I agree with along with some hyperbole, I usually just wish that the poster had toned it down a bit. I guess that's just the nature of UseNet. Have a good evening, -- Stinger |
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "Stinger" As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However, it's not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at home in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game. Bull****. In reality, the Democrats are no closer to the Politburo than the Republicans are to the SS. Your inference that Democrats open the door to communism is simply offensive. You won't sway many voters with that kind of rhetoric. Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest about who they are. -- Stinger |
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "Stinger" Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest about who they are. The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's. Real socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the vanguard of creeping socialism. Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of social control advocated by the German fascists? Can't you be honest about their agendas? They definitely would not laugh at Hillary, and your "real Socialists" would see her, Kerry, and Teddy K. as kindred spirits. As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance. -- Stinger |
STINGER,
The Liberal 'left' always likes to cite Hitler as the EVIL ONE ! Hitler - NAZI - Fascism * Estimate 16 Million Killed But, the Left has its own Monsters who Killed Many More in the Name of the 'just cause' of World Communism: Pol Pot - Communism * Estimate 4 Million Killed Mao - Cultural Revolution - Communism * Estimate 32 Million Killed Stalin - Communism * Estimate 40 Million Killed * Note: Murdered Directly, Starved to Death, or Force into Slave Labor Camps to Work and Die. ADD a few Acient Killers like Ghengis Khan, Kublai Khan, Atilla the Hun and Tamerlane. Check-Out Hyper-History: http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n...n2/hist_6.html Just the Facts ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Stinger" wrote in message = = = ... RHF, Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and resemble neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can draw some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats and the Politburo of the former USSR. -- Stinger "RHF" wrote in message m... = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" Stalin has not announced that he's running for President, this year. Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for him... He could run as a Democrat. :) And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close. MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI" So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat. * Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys * Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish Just the Facts ~ RHF . . Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest about who they are. The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's. Real socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the vanguard of creeping socialism. Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of social control advocated by the German fascists? Can't you be honest about their agendas? Why can't you be honest Fat Boy? |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance. So Bush and Ashcroft's constant appeals for expanded Patriot Act powers demonstrate "reluctance" on their parts? Good luck selling that one! The Patriot Act should include the immediate arrest of any academic who lies about his/her educational credentials. Lying educators are terrorists! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com