Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bilateral Pussycats" wrote in message groups.com... http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...y=1110&slug=Ca stro%20Prank Saturday, April 24, 2004 Fla. station fined $4,000 for Castro prank THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Simply put - it is against FCC rules to broadcast a telephone call with consent from all parties involved. Nothing political at work - just a plain and simple rule violation. -- Jon Scaptura http://radio.scaptura.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless I am mistaken, on Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:06:00 GMT, "Jon"
wrote: "Bilateral Pussycats" wrote in message sgroups.com... http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...y=1110&slug=Ca stro%20Prank Saturday, April 24, 2004 Fla. station fined $4,000 for Castro prank THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Simply put - it is against FCC rules to broadcast a telephone call with consent from all parties involved. Nothing political at work - just a plain and simple rule violation. I think you mean "without" consent from all parties involved. Use the usual techniques if you wish to reply via email. Molon Labe! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
RILEY SAYS K1MAN BROADCASTS ARE LEGAL | General | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Geller Media | Broadcasting |