From: "-=jd=-"

He has his point of view and he articulates it well. I'm not required to
agree with him. He's not required to agree with anything I write either.
However, no-one gains anything by degrading the validity of their opinions
by resorting to vitriol and personal insult. I just think that when
someone posts with a level of common courtesy, you *should* feel compelled
to reciprocate, whether you agree with them or not. There's certainly a
glaring lack of common courtesy in society today and there's absolutely
nothing wrong with demonstrating some when you get a chance. That's all
I'm saying.

This from someone that has never rebuked Steve Lare for his daily common
courtesies. In fact, JD has gone out of his way to tell me that it was my
respomsibility, since I asked for it. All you're doing JD is showing how
inconsistent and hypocritical you really are.

As Stinger suggested, I have pointed out many of the same arguments. I don't
usually engage in insults until the other party initiates them. I sure don't
see you calling out folks like N8KDV, Teleamon, Tracy Fort or RHF for their
insult-laden posts. I guess that's because they're on your side, right.

What a putz!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) King of Trolls wrote:

From: "-=jd=-"

He has his point of view and he articulates it well. I'm not required to
agree with him. He's not required to agree with anything I write either.
However, no-one gains anything by degrading the validity of their opinions
by resorting to vitriol and personal insult. I just think that when
someone posts with a level of common courtesy, you *should* feel compelled
to reciprocate, whether you agree with them or not. There's certainly a
glaring lack of common courtesy in society today and there's absolutely
nothing wrong with demonstrating some when you get a chance. That's all
I'm saying.

This from someone that has never rebuked Steve Lare for his daily common
courtesies. In fact, JD has gone out of his way to tell me that it was my
respomsibility, since I asked for it. All you're doing JD is showing how
inconsistent and hypocritical you really are.

As Stinger suggested, I have pointed out many of the same arguments. I don't
usually engage in insults until the other party initiates them. I sure don't
see you calling out folks like N8KDV, Teleamon, Tracy Fort or RHF for their
insult-laden posts. I guess that's because they're on your side, right.

What a putz!

Whatever you say Mikey! Nobody insults more people than you on a daily
basis. Nobody starts more off topic threads than you do. Nobody has as
many off topic threads started with their name in it. You must be proud
to be the most successful Troll in RRS history.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article
,
Telamon wrote:

In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) King of Trolls wrote:

From: "-=jd=-"

He has his point of view and he articulates it well. I'm not
required to agree with him. He's not required to agree with
anything I write either. However, no-one gains anything by
degrading the validity of their opinions by resorting to vitriol
and personal insult. I just think that when someone posts with a
level of common courtesy, you *should* feel compelled to
reciprocate, whether you agree with them or not. There's certainly
a glaring lack of common courtesy in society today and there's
absolutely nothing wrong with demonstrating some when you get a
chance. That's all I'm saying.

This from someone that has never rebuked Steve Lare for his daily
common courtesies. In fact, JD has gone out of his way to tell me
that it was my respomsibility, since I asked for it. All you're
doing JD is showing how inconsistent and hypocritical you really
are.

As Stinger suggested, I have pointed out many of the same
arguments. I don't usually engage in insults until the other party
initiates them. I sure don't see you calling out folks like N8KDV,
Teleamon, Tracy Fort or RHF for their insult-laden posts. I guess
that's because they're on your side, right.

What a putz!

Whatever you say Mikey! Nobody insults more people than you on a
daily basis. Nobody starts more off topic threads than you do. Nobody
has as many off topic threads started with their name in it. You must
be proud to be the most successful Troll in RRS history.

The above is a good example of how Mikey makes RRS the nasty place it
is. Notice once the debate went against him he started calling names
and even took a swipe at everyone else in the newsgroup he usually does
not agree with.

Mikey has no objectivity, lies at the drop of a hat, has no credibility
because of this, and of course is a total hypocrite. Mike's is bored
with debate and seeks dramatize the exchanges between himself and
others for fun. It is this, which makes him the most successful Troll
in RRS history. Mikey complains but the truth is this is want he wants.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Michael 'Which way to the rendering works?' Bryant wrote:

From: "-=jd=-"

He has his point of view and he articulates it well. I'm not required to
agree with him. He's not required to agree with anything I write either.
However, no-one gains anything by degrading the validity of their opinions
by resorting to vitriol and personal insult. I just think that when
someone posts with a level of common courtesy, you *should* feel compelled
to reciprocate, whether you agree with them or not. There's certainly a
glaring lack of common courtesy in society today and there's absolutely
nothing wrong with demonstrating some when you get a chance. That's all
I'm saying.

This from someone that has never rebuked Steve Lare for his daily common
courtesies. In fact, JD has gone out of his way to tell me that it was my
respomsibility, since I asked for it. All you're doing JD is showing how
inconsistent and hypocritical you really are.

As Stinger suggested, I have pointed out many of the same arguments. I don't
usually engage in insults until the other party initiates them. I sure don't
see you calling out folks like N8KDV, Teleamon, Tracy Fort or RHF for their
insult-laden posts. I guess that's because they're on your side, right.

What a putz!

What an idiot! My posts are not insult laden, they are fact laden. You ARE a FAT
PIECE OF ****... That's a FACT!

From: N8KDV

What an idiot! My posts are not insult laden, they are fact laden. You ARE a
FAT
PIECE OF ****... That's a FACT!

Thanks, Steve for proving my point! Zero facts, maximum insults.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

What an idiot! My posts are not insult laden, they are fact laden. You ARE a
FAT
PIECE OF ****... That's a FACT!

Thanks, Steve for proving my point! Zero facts, maximum insults.

The facts WERE there, Fat Boy!

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

SNIP
What a putz!


And thank you for proving my point, Michael! Please show me where I threw
the first pitch. When you run out of ideas, there's always name-calling,
huh? You just can't resist it.

Like JD, I do appreciate civil discourse without name-calling. However,
once again, you have illustrated how you lower the bar, then whine when
someone swats back (or does the same).

Michael, I don't think I've ever seen you get into much more than a
two-response thread without slamming the other poster's intelligence,
reading comprehension, etc., and though many do respond in a like manner,
I've yet to see some posters reply in-kind. You probably don't realize
this, but it's almost down to a formula. If I had time to waste, I could
build a "check sheet" for an MWB response.

That's awfully tiresome drivel from somebody that fancies himself as a
professional (with credentials) in debating.

My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger

From: "Stinger"

Like JD, I do appreciate civil discourse without name-calling. However,
once again, you have illustrated how you lower the bar, then whine when
someone swats back (or does the same).

JD is hardly without any responsiblilty. I defy you to see how far back you
have to go to find some posts of his to me where he isn't being insulting.

Michael, I don't think I've ever seen you get into much more than a
two-response thread without slamming the other poster's intelligence,
reading comprehension, etc., and though many do respond in a like manner,
I've yet to see some posters reply in-kind. You probably don't realize
this, but it's almost down to a formula. If I had time to waste, I could
build a "check sheet" for an MWB response.

And you know (or at least you said so in backchannels!) that there are others
in this NG who you don't have to wait until the second response before they
belittle you with insults. Why don't you berate them the same way you do me. In
public, that is. Is it because they're on your side?



That's awfully tiresome drivel from somebody that fancies himself as a
professional (with credentials) in debating.

My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger










My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger

But you accept OPINION on your side as FACT. Betz provides more supporting
FACTS than does JD's OPINIONS. but you treat JD's discourse as factual. How can
you even pretend to be objective?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)