Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends on the pH of the water. Disintegration would occur far more readily in
water that is acidic and would occur much more slowly in alkaline water. Unless there is a tramatic alteration in the pH of the oceans and that is unlikely as CO2 dissolved in water can form a slightly alkaline buffer then I wouldn't think that CO2 released from coral skeletons would be a big problem. Regards John Barnard Diverd4777 wrote: Yeah, evidence around the world from Coral die -off indicates the water temp is Rising; - - Which Means tha it's load of Dissolved Gases will be headed into the Atmosphere. Coral skeleton disintegration will release more CO2 into the surrounding water.. Accelerating CO2 content of the Atmosphere.. - AND ( We're Doomed... ) - Either that or just Pump More Oil to Burn to either Warm Us Up ( Cooling / Ice Age) Or Cool Us Down & Pump the water elsewhere ( Warming trend / Rising Sea Level) - So , Thanks to our Good Freinds Who Supply The Oil, you really don't have a thing to worry about.. In article EPNpc.10767$RM.5570@edtnps89, m II writes: Subject: [ OT ] Is our climate nearing the tipping point? From: m II Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 17:48:20 GMT David wrote: Is that your mantra? Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been going pretty radically up since we started burning coal. Patterns is the last 600 years are unique. They do not have historical precedent that we can discern from ice and geological records. Regardless, if we are near the tipping point, it's way too late to reverse the inevitable. Man, we live in interesting times! On Sat, 15 May 2004 20:51:58 GMT, Telamon wrote: You have to be a total nut-case to argue global warming is man made. There is billions of watts of energy going in and out of the atmosphere on a daily basis that eventually determines the air temperature. Man's energy output and use is negligible by comparison. Changes in the atmospheric chemistry are natural and changes in climate are natural whatever direction it is going. There may be a problem with the oceans absorbing co2. When the water gets warmer it can hold less gas in solution. If it ever starts giving OFF this stored gas, we're doomed, as the cyle will be self perpetuating. The above hypothesis is not at this site, but some good numbers, regardless. http://www.atmos.washington.edu/2002...mancarbon.html Add water vapor to the mix and the problem compounds exponentially http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/New...104254688.html mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , John Barnard
wrote: Depends on the pH of the water. Disintegration would occur far more readily in water that is acidic and would occur much more slowly in alkaline water. Unless there is a tramatic alteration in the pH of the oceans and that is unlikely as CO2 dissolved in water can form a slightly alkaline buffer then I wouldn't think that CO2 released from coral skeletons would be a big problem. That is just part of the explanation for the very complex system of gases, temperatures, currents and chemical composition of the oceans. The oceans are a large part but still a portion of climate stability. The jury is still out on what is going to happen 10, 50 or 500 years from now. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree that it is impossible to predict what will happen 10, 50 or 100
years from now. This entire globe is one great big "mess" of complex chemistry and reactions and the best models aren't that great at predicting how the biosphere responds to a single input let alone to all the things that happen simultaneously. However, it is known that a single catastrophic event can have dire climatic effects. For example, the quantity of material tossed out by Krakatoa in 1883 had world-wide effects on climate. Such a large quantity of material tossed into the atmosphere does cut down on the amount of sunlight getting in and cooling tend to follow such tremendous volcanic eruptions. From such observations came the idea that multiple nuclear explosions would result in a nuclear winter. I also have no doubt that mankind is very good at destroying or negatively altering the earth's ecosystems. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) can destroy ozone quite readily and they destroy ozone in a quasi-catalytic manner (ie. CFCs can eventually be consumed during the process of ozone destruction). I would also think that dumping tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, potentially beyond the capabilities of the biosphere to handle it, is also quite self-destructive. Regards John Barnard Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Depends on the pH of the water. Disintegration would occur far more readily in water that is acidic and would occur much more slowly in alkaline water. Unless there is a tramatic alteration in the pH of the oceans and that is unlikely as CO2 dissolved in water can form a slightly alkaline buffer then I wouldn't think that CO2 released from coral skeletons would be a big problem. That is just part of the explanation for the very complex system of gases, temperatures, currents and chemical composition of the oceans. The oceans are a large part but still a portion of climate stability. The jury is still out on what is going to happen 10, 50 or 500 years from now. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
" ARC-5" Transmitter Power Supply. | Boatanchors | |||
Antenna Reactance Question | Antenna | |||
Stigar i Kveom | Shortwave |