In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

Thanks.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

I'll say one thing about this group currently posting: They use more
complicated words than Bryant does!



Thanks.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

I'll say one thing about this group currently posting: They use more
complicated words than Bryant does!

I have sent a dozen responses to the other two newsgroups asking them to
stop cross posting.

I don't like playing netcop but I will report them if it continues.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

I have sent a dozen responses to the other two newsgroups asking them to
stop cross posting.

I don't like playing netcop but I will report them if it continues.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Here's an excerpt from the rec.radio.shortwave charter:

"This group is intended to be a place where ANY radio monitoring topic can
and
should be discussed. We are happy to hear from posters who listen to any
part
of the radio or microwave spectrum, from DC to daylight. We discuss topics
of
almost any kind, ranging from (but not limited to) shortwave broadcasting,
DXing small or distant shortwave stations, utility and teletype monitoring,
military eavesdropping, station schedules, QSLing sw broadcasters, spectrum
usage, equipment design and modifications, antennas, receiver reviews and
recommendations, and many more."

"Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT limit
discussions to shortwave only. Any radio-related topics are welcome."

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/monitoring/introduction/

Frank Dresser

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

I'll say one thing about this group currently posting: They use more
complicated words than Bryant does!

Like just about any technical newsgroup it is a painful read. Half the
time stuff is wrong and then other people try to correct mistakes or
misunderstandings. You can sit there and watch the threads drift closer
to and then away from being correct and it just drives me nuts.

Worse sometime the correct answer is posted and others go on with the
wrong ideas anyway. Really sucks. These groups generally have
humongously long threads.

Then there is always at least one retard to stir the crap.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

I'll say one thing about this group currently posting: They use more
complicated words than Bryant does!

Like just about any technical newsgroup it is a painful read. Half the
time stuff is wrong and then other people try to correct mistakes or
misunderstandings. You can sit there and watch the threads drift closer
to and then away from being correct and it just drives me nuts.

Worse sometime the correct answer is posted and others go on with the
wrong ideas anyway. Really sucks. These groups generally have
humongously long threads.

Then there is always at least one retard to stir the crap.

Darn, I always tend to connect the dublistoid to the hummingifier via an
entrencher with a 10 megohm resistor shunted to ground through a
demystifier and it seems to work for me *almost* every time!

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

I'll say one thing about this group currently posting: They use more
complicated words than Bryant does!

Like just about any technical newsgroup it is a painful read. Half the
time stuff is wrong and then other people try to correct mistakes or
misunderstandings. You can sit there and watch the threads drift closer
to and then away from being correct and it just drives me nuts.

Worse sometime the correct answer is posted and others go on with the
wrong ideas anyway. Really sucks. These groups generally have
humongously long threads.

Then there is always at least one retard to stir the crap.

Darn, I always tend to connect the dublistoid to the hummingifier via an
entrencher with a 10 megohm resistor shunted to ground through a
demystifier and it seems to work for me *almost* every time!

Makes you long for the days of "your radio sucks threads."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

I'll say one thing about this group currently posting: They use more
complicated words than Bryant does!

Like just about any technical newsgroup it is a painful read. Half the
time stuff is wrong and then other people try to correct mistakes or
misunderstandings. You can sit there and watch the threads drift closer
to and then away from being correct and it just drives me nuts.

Worse sometime the correct answer is posted and others go on with the
wrong ideas anyway. Really sucks. These groups generally have
humongously long threads.

Then there is always at least one retard to stir the crap.

Darn, I always tend to connect the dublistoid to the hummingifier via an
entrencher with a 10 megohm resistor shunted to ground through a
demystifier and it seems to work for me *almost* every time!

Makes you long for the days of "your radio sucks threads."

Yes, I believe it does.

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

Thanks.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

What's the problem? This is a radio related discussion.

Frank Dresser

In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(John Byrns) wrote:

Please delete rec.radio.shortwave from the news group header.

Thanks.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

What's the problem? This is a radio related discussion.

Frank Dresser

What does this have to do with listening to SW or BCB?

These guys are have their own conversation on radio design in another
group. More power to them. Why the need to cross post it?

If I or anyone else wants to they can subscribe to the other groups and
join in.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California