Dwight Stewart wrote:

"RHF" wrote:


You are smarter than this. With the
'right' Computer and Software (snip)



Look, I don't know if the documents are fake or not. However, the
arguments used so far to suggest they are fake (line wrap, character
spacing, and a few superscript characters) are far less than convincing.
With only a photocopy available, chemical analysis of the paper would
probably be useless.

That is obvious to the most casual of observers, the analysis would have
to be done on the original documents. DUH.

And the person who sent photocopies of military
documents to the press is not likely to come forward now to point to the
original documents.

Why not? Do you think they might be afraid they would be made a fool of
if the originals were submitted to analysis?

Until someone can produce the original documents for scrutiny, then I
see no reason not to consider the documents that were distrubited as
possible fakes.