LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old February 7th 05, 01:47 PM
Brian Hill
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...

"CW" wrote in message
...

The real reason for the original law (they gave a few spurious
reasons, of course) was a desire on the part of large media
corporations to protect their big investments in mediumwave networks
from competition from lower-expense shortwave upstarts, who could
easily have covered the nation with a couple of 50,000-Watt
transmitters. Can't have that!


You know that is BS. That law is older than both of us. It was put in

place
long before any "large media"


NBC was formed in 1926, which certainly predates the FCC and probably
predates the FRC. When was this presumed law enacted? If it's actually a
FCC regulation, when did the FCC enact it?


. The sole purpose was to PREVENT large media
from controlling the airwaves. It was thought that it would be far more
beneficial to have small, reasonably local stations that would reflect

the
view of local communities and provide a voice for differing points of

view.

There was only a small fraction of the stations on the air before WW2 as
there are now. In the 30s and 40s, radio was centered in the big cities.
Nearly all stations had to run network programming in order to survive.

There was very little local radio programming before WW2. Local
programming, such as it was, developed in the 50s, after the networks

turned
their interest to television.


It is the same reason that you need federal approval to buy a media

outlet
such as radio stations, TV stations and newspapers. It was thought, and

they
were correct, that diversity of views was a good thing and having a few
giant companies controlling the media would be counterproductive.



Giant companies such as NBC, CBS and Mutual controlled radio. Well, they
did split NBC.

You are
right in that the FCC seems to be more and more attracted to the money

but
that is a relatively recent thing, counter to the old rules under
discussion.



Then why did the network backed stations get the best frequencies, the

clear
channels and the highest power limits?

Why were the school affiliated stations ghettoized?

Frank Dresser



ghettoized? Hey Frank, is that from the same Co. that does Simonize?

B.H.




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Problem of Mixing Religion and Science Richard Clark Antenna 4 September 29th 04 01:48 PM
[ OT ] Is our climate nearing the tipping point? Soames123 Shortwave 63 May 19th 04 06:36 AM
Cherry Hill horse racetrack- Mad Cow Disease Link found Soames123 Shortwave 18 January 6th 04 01:14 AM
cobra 29 with sound tracker,,doesnt hear good,,schematic?? don CB 0 July 23rd 03 03:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017