LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old February 23rd 05, 04:47 AM
Brian Oakley
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Honus" wrote in message
news:CWSSd.54281$uc.22333@trnddc04...

"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...
Honus wrote:

"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...

Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a
search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll
turn up a few of them.


No. Name one. I'm not interested in seeing who uses the spelling xian

or
g-d. I'm not interested in wading through all of the posts that have

one
of
those words in them, either, in search of someone saying that they

look
on
the death of any Christian with glee. I'm interested in hearing -you-

name
someone in this group who "would rejoice at the thoughts of the death

of
any
true Christian." Surely you must have had someone in mind? Or a more
specific post to cite?


You want someone else to do ALL your work for you? Besides that, just
because I know something doesn't mean I have to tell YOU! . . . . and
just because you DEMAND it! ;-)


You realize, don't you, that you could have written a name in a fraction

of
the time and with a fraction of the effort that it took for you to
demonstrate your inability to support your claims? But of course, that's
redundant. You can't write a name because you can't support your claim.

Besides, I didn't ask for you to do my homework; I asked for -you- to
support -your- allegation. I asked if you had a name in mind. I asked if

you
had a specific post that you could cite to bolster your claim.

Your failure is duly noted.

And certainly not unexpected.

So just because someone doesn't do exactly as you dictate, its failure. I
see. Lets all bow down to the person that screams the loudest. That's a good
way to win an argument. Just call them a failure for lack of anything YOU
could post to the contrary? Now lets put the shoe on the other foot. You
asked him for proof. Are you willing to back up your allegation that there
are NOT any on the ng that would rejoice at the death of a real Christian?
Statistics show that through the centuries, there are more that do rejoice
at the death of Christians than there are of those that don't. That is an
obvious historical fact, no one even has to look that up.
B


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gene Scott, satellites and MW Honus Shortwave 19 August 22nd 04 08:25 PM
Gene Scott, satellites and MW Honus Dx 8 August 18th 04 10:22 AM
Gene Scott, satellites and MW Honus Dx 0 August 16th 04 08:49 PM
EH Scott 'morale' receiver Rich Boatanchors 26 March 29th 04 10:24 PM
Leland Scott Is Innocent Ruby Tuesday CB 0 March 9th 04 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017