Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 6th 05, 06:13 AM
mike maghakian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

read these reviews of the RX-340, I don't think that they would say the 350
and 340 are about the same/////////

http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/3757

for that matter, read Magnes reviews, I don't think he would say they are
similar either........




"Les" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill Crocker wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions on Ten-Tec's RX-350D HF receiver.

It's very
expensive, and it doesn't appear to be in wide use.

Thanks in advance for your input.

Bill Crocker


I had one for over a year, it had the optional remote keypad and the
latest V1.15 software update. I thought it was a good receiver,
sensitive, lots of bandwidth choices (34 I think), good audio, good
agc, decent synchronous detector if properly used. The only reason I
sold mine was to buy a Ten Tec RX-340. I actually ran them side by side
for over a month before selling the 350D, not a whole lot of difference
between the two receivers imho. I think the biggest gripe most owners
have about it is the seemingly indifference by Ten Tec to updates on
the software which has a couple of minor (IMHO) bugs.

Les Locklear



  #2   Report Post  
Old May 6th 05, 02:06 PM
Les
 
Posts: n/a
Default


mike maghakian wrote:
read these reviews of the RX-340, I don't think that they would say

the 350
and 340 are about the same/////////

http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/3757

for that matter, read Magnes reviews, I don't think he would say they

are
similar either........




"Les" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill Crocker wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions on Ten-Tec's RX-350D HF receiver.

It's very
expensive, and it doesn't appear to be in wide use.

Thanks in advance for your input.

Bill Crocker


I had one for over a year, it had the optional remote keypad and

the
latest V1.15 software update. I thought it was a good receiver,
sensitive, lots of bandwidth choices (34 I think), good audio, good
agc, decent synchronous detector if properly used. The only reason

I
sold mine was to buy a Ten Tec RX-340. I actually ran them side by

side
for over a month before selling the 350D, not a whole lot of

difference
between the two receivers imho. I think the biggest gripe most

owners
have about it is the seemingly indifference by Ten Tec to updates

on
the software which has a couple of minor (IMHO) bugs.

Les Locklear


Opinions are like assholes Mike, everyone has one and lots of them
stink. I operated both receiver side by side and i stated my opinion.
Magne isn't the end all for receiver reviews ya know.

I know you had a bad experience and seem to have a hard on for Ten Tec.
That is your opinion and right.

Mine differed from yours.

Les

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Opinions Please.... Biz WDØHCO Homebrew 0 May 2nd 04 02:10 PM
Opinions of Universal Radio ? Gray Shockley Shortwave 64 March 19th 04 07:30 AM
Opinions of Universal Radio ? Burr Policy 56 March 16th 04 03:13 PM
Opinions of Universal Radio ? Burr Shortwave 0 February 18th 04 06:40 PM
JWIN-14 opinions snow Shortwave 2 February 15th 04 05:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017