"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Thu 09 Jun 2005 12:43:02a, "Honus"
wrote in message news:qNPpe.11278$nr3.10238@trnddc02:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Tue 07 Jun 2005 11:17:48p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:wrtpe.5486$Kj3.3577@trnddc03:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Mon 06 Jun 2005 08:28:55p, "Honus"


You clearly misunderstood the thrust of my question.


It would appear that there's plenty of "misunderstanding" to go
around...

So then it's business as usual.


Unless it's not. I have to admit - I lost track of whatever it was...

Eh...it probably wasn't worth it anyway. g