LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old June 8th 05, 02:51 AM
Unrevealed Source
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Perhaps he is looking for a full coverage receiver, which the SX-190 is not.

"Arthur Pozner" wrote in message
...
I may sound sarcastic,but why would anyone need a Realistic DX-160?
This radio has: poor frequency resolution (main dial+amateur band
bandspread only), single conversion (awful images every 910 KHz),
undescribibly low dynamic range (was probably OK in the 50's and 60's
), single 4 KHz mechanical (!!!) IF filter (surprise), substantial
drift,especially when used in CW/SSB mode...
May I suggest a Realistic/Allied SX-190, a MUCH,MUCH better designed
and built receiver. It might seem very strange.but both -160 and
-190 came from the same manufacturer.if not mistaken. Believe it was GRE
in Japan.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RadioShack "Realistic" DX-160 Receiver RHF Shortwave 2 January 5th 05 11:11 PM
Wanted: Realistic PRO-7A or 7B Bill Carreira Scanner 0 December 9th 03 01:44 AM
realistic dx-160 speaker wanted John Couch Homebrew 0 November 11th 03 08:54 PM
realistic dx-160 speaker wanted John Couch Homebrew 0 November 11th 03 08:54 PM
Help Wanted - Realistic CTR-75 VOX Recorder Victor Watkins Scanner 2 July 26th 03 07:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017