Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... wrote: I think being careful is a good idea, but you're remarkably pessimistic. Last year one of my antennas took a direct hit. Everything in front of the polyphaser was destroyed. Everything in back of it was fine. I'm sure a strike could have done more damage - but it's not hopeless. In my case, a strike would need to follow over 300 feet of underground coax to get to the house. Reading your house insurance policy contract is a good idea, in case there is something in there. There are differences, but even though they're insured with different companies in different states, the insurance contracts I've read for homes in CT, FL and NJ look to be based on the same boiler plate form. Insurance companies aren't likely to deny a claim if you can show you made even a minimal good faith effort to have a safe system. The courts would rule against them unless they could point to a specific provision in your policy allowing them to deny coverage. The company sets the terms of the contract, so anything in doubt will be decided in your favor. On the other hand, if an insurance company inspected your house and saw an antenna they might decide they don't want to insure you - but they'd need to give you time to correct the problem - and you'd have some time to try reasoning with them if you really have made (or are willing to make) an effort to make sure the system is safe. But frankly, I doubt antennas are on their minds. A friend with a serious antenna farm got a letter threatening to drop him if he didn't put a second railing on his back steps. Hard to imagine they could see the steps without noticing the antennas. Your concern someone could be tossed in jail for an unintentional building code violation is incredible. I'd have to concur. Unless you were so criminally negligent and put others at risk, such as tenants, I see no reason you'd be prosecuted. Also, insurance would pay your claim but then drop you. And some won't pay... not necessarily for a lightening strike but for an auto accident. A word to the wise.. don't insure with AAA. Trust me. My sympathies. dxAce Michigan USA |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() FDR wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... wrote: I think being careful is a good idea, but you're remarkably pessimistic. Last year one of my antennas took a direct hit. Everything in front of the polyphaser was destroyed. Everything in back of it was fine. I'm sure a strike could have done more damage - but it's not hopeless. In my case, a strike would need to follow over 300 feet of underground coax to get to the house. Reading your house insurance policy contract is a good idea, in case there is something in there. There are differences, but even though they're insured with different companies in different states, the insurance contracts I've read for homes in CT, FL and NJ look to be based on the same boiler plate form. Insurance companies aren't likely to deny a claim if you can show you made even a minimal good faith effort to have a safe system. The courts would rule against them unless they could point to a specific provision in your policy allowing them to deny coverage. The company sets the terms of the contract, so anything in doubt will be decided in your favor. On the other hand, if an insurance company inspected your house and saw an antenna they might decide they don't want to insure you - but they'd need to give you time to correct the problem - and you'd have some time to try reasoning with them if you really have made (or are willing to make) an effort to make sure the system is safe. But frankly, I doubt antennas are on their minds. A friend with a serious antenna farm got a letter threatening to drop him if he didn't put a second railing on his back steps. Hard to imagine they could see the steps without noticing the antennas. Your concern someone could be tossed in jail for an unintentional building code violation is incredible. I'd have to concur. Unless you were so criminally negligent and put others at risk, such as tenants, I see no reason you'd be prosecuted. Also, insurance would pay your claim but then drop you. And some won't pay... not necessarily for a lightening strike but for an auto accident. A word to the wise.. don't insure with AAA. Trust me. My sympathies. I actually appreciate that as it's been a real pain in the neck (no pun intended) for the last (almost two years). But what the heck, it'll only take about $30,000 to fix. dxAce Michigan USA |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... wrote: I think being careful is a good idea, but you're remarkably pessimistic. Last year one of my antennas took a direct hit. Everything in front of the polyphaser was destroyed. Everything in back of it was fine. I'm sure a strike could have done more damage - but it's not hopeless. In my case, a strike would need to follow over 300 feet of underground coax to get to the house. Reading your house insurance policy contract is a good idea, in case there is something in there. There are differences, but even though they're insured with different companies in different states, the insurance contracts I've read for homes in CT, FL and NJ look to be based on the same boiler plate form. Insurance companies aren't likely to deny a claim if you can show you made even a minimal good faith effort to have a safe system. The courts would rule against them unless they could point to a specific provision in your policy allowing them to deny coverage. The company sets the terms of the contract, so anything in doubt will be decided in your favor. On the other hand, if an insurance company inspected your house and saw an antenna they might decide they don't want to insure you - but they'd need to give you time to correct the problem - and you'd have some time to try reasoning with them if you really have made (or are willing to make) an effort to make sure the system is safe. But frankly, I doubt antennas are on their minds. A friend with a serious antenna farm got a letter threatening to drop him if he didn't put a second railing on his back steps. Hard to imagine they could see the steps without noticing the antennas. Your concern someone could be tossed in jail for an unintentional building code violation is incredible. I'd have to concur. Unless you were so criminally negligent and put others at risk, such as tenants, I see no reason you'd be prosecuted. Also, insurance would pay your claim but then drop you. And some won't pay... not necessarily for a lightening strike but for an auto accident. A word to the wise.. don't insure with AAA. Trust me. My sympathies. I actually appreciate that as it's been a real pain in the neck (no pun intended) for the last (almost two years). But what the heck, it'll only take about $30,000 to fix. Best of luck with that. Sincerely. dxAce Michigan USA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
FDR wrote:
I actually appreciate that as it's been a real pain in the neck (no pun intended) for the last (almost two years). But what the heck, it'll only take about $30,000 to fix. Best of luck with that. Sincerely. yeah..those pesky soft tissue injuries. The Ace just admitted that money will cure his ills. That would be a miracle indeed. If it were ANYONE else other than the Ace himself, I'd say it was a fraud attempt. mike |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() m II wrote: FDR wrote: I actually appreciate that as it's been a real pain in the neck (no pun intended) for the last (almost two years). But what the heck, it'll only take about $30,000 to fix. Best of luck with that. Sincerely. yeah..those pesky soft tissue injuries. The Ace just admitted that money will cure his ills. That would be a miracle indeed. If it were ANYONE else other than the Ace himself, I'd say it was a fraud attempt. Soft tissue? Actually it's a bone injury. You ever had a boner? Ah... probably not, you're a Canuck. dxAce Michigan USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() FDR wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... wrote: I think being careful is a good idea, but you're remarkably pessimistic. Last year one of my antennas took a direct hit. Everything in front of the polyphaser was destroyed. Everything in back of it was fine. I'm sure a strike could have done more damage - but it's not hopeless. In my case, a strike would need to follow over 300 feet of underground coax to get to the house. Reading your house insurance policy contract is a good idea, in case there is something in there. There are differences, but even though they're insured with different companies in different states, the insurance contracts I've read for homes in CT, FL and NJ look to be based on the same boiler plate form. Insurance companies aren't likely to deny a claim if you can show you made even a minimal good faith effort to have a safe system. The courts would rule against them unless they could point to a specific provision in your policy allowing them to deny coverage. The company sets the terms of the contract, so anything in doubt will be decided in your favor. On the other hand, if an insurance company inspected your house and saw an antenna they might decide they don't want to insure you - but they'd need to give you time to correct the problem - and you'd have some time to try reasoning with them if you really have made (or are willing to make) an effort to make sure the system is safe. But frankly, I doubt antennas are on their minds. A friend with a serious antenna farm got a letter threatening to drop him if he didn't put a second railing on his back steps. Hard to imagine they could see the steps without noticing the antennas. Your concern someone could be tossed in jail for an unintentional building code violation is incredible. I'd have to concur. Unless you were so criminally negligent and put others at risk, such as tenants, I see no reason you'd be prosecuted. Also, insurance would pay your claim but then drop you. And some won't pay... not necessarily for a lightening strike but for an auto accident. A word to the wise.. don't insure with AAA. Trust me. My sympathies. I actually appreciate that as it's been a real pain in the neck (no pun intended) for the last (almost two years). But what the heck, it'll only take about $30,000 to fix. Best of luck with that. Sincerely. TNX dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |